Skip to main content

Segmented Pseudowire
RFC 6073

Yes

(Ralph Droms)

No Objection

Lars Eggert
(Alexey Melnikov)
(Cullen Jennings)
(Dan Romascanu)
(Jari Arkko)
(Lisa Dusseault)
(Robert Sparks)
(Ron Bonica)
(Ross Callon)
(Tim Polk)

Note: This ballot was opened for revision 18 and is now closed.

Lars Eggert (was Discuss) No Objection

(Ralph Droms; former steering group member) Yes

Yes ()

                            

(Adrian Farrel; former steering group member) (was Discuss, No Objection, Discuss) No Objection

No Objection (2010-09-17)
Thanks for version 18 which addresses my remaining comments.

(Alexey Melnikov; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ()

                            

(Cullen Jennings; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ()

                            

(Dan Romascanu; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ()

                            

(Jari Arkko; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ()

                            

(Lisa Dusseault; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ()

                            

(Magnus Westerlund; former steering group member) (was Discuss) No Objection

No Objection (2009-09-10)
I also support Lars Eggerts discuss regarding congestion control. It seems that multi-segment in its various combinations have many potential ways of breaking the congestion control loop. Thus that fact and what can be done on the signalling plane by the S-PE is important.

(Robert Sparks; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ()

                            

(Ron Bonica; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ()

                            

(Ross Callon; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ()

                            

(Russ Housley; former steering group member) (was Discuss, No Objection) No Objection

No Objection (2009-09-10)
  The Gen-ART Review by Sean Turner on 31-Aug-2009 raises a few questions:

  - Do you really want 7 authors?  The RFC Editor prefers 5 or less.

  - Should the Introduction be Section 1?

  - Sec 7.4.1: Indicates the PW Switching Point description string is
    80 characters long.  Should it say more about the character set?

  - Sec 8.4.1: Figure shows both AC "Up" and AC "UP".  Should they all
    be "Up"?

  - Sec 16: s/Author's/Authors'

  - There are a couple of places where " , " should be changed to ", "

(Tim Polk; former steering group member) (was Discuss) No Objection

No Objection ()