Skip to main content

Segmented Pseudowire
RFC 6073

Yes

(Ralph Droms)

No Objection

Lars Eggert
(Alexey Melnikov)
(Cullen Jennings)
(Dan Romascanu)
(Jari Arkko)
(Lisa Dusseault)
(Robert Sparks)
(Ron Bonica)
(Ross Callon)
(Tim Polk)

Note: This ballot was opened for revision 18 and is now closed.

Lars Eggert
(was Discuss) No Objection
Ralph Droms Former IESG member
Yes
Yes ()

                            
Adrian Farrel Former IESG member
(was Discuss, No Objection, Discuss) No Objection
No Objection (2010-09-17)
Thanks for version 18 which addresses my remaining comments.
Alexey Melnikov Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection ()

                            
Cullen Jennings Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection ()

                            
Dan Romascanu Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection ()

                            
Jari Arkko Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection ()

                            
Lisa Dusseault Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection ()

                            
Magnus Westerlund Former IESG member
(was Discuss) No Objection
No Objection (2009-09-10)
I also support Lars Eggerts discuss regarding congestion control. It seems that multi-segment in its various combinations have many potential ways of breaking the congestion control loop. Thus that fact and what can be done on the signalling plane by the S-PE is important.
Robert Sparks Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection ()

                            
Ron Bonica Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection ()

                            
Ross Callon Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection ()

                            
Russ Housley Former IESG member
(was Discuss, No Objection) No Objection
No Objection (2009-09-10)
  The Gen-ART Review by Sean Turner on 31-Aug-2009 raises a few questions:

  - Do you really want 7 authors?  The RFC Editor prefers 5 or less.

  - Should the Introduction be Section 1?

  - Sec 7.4.1: Indicates the PW Switching Point description string is
    80 characters long.  Should it say more about the character set?

  - Sec 8.4.1: Figure shows both AC "Up" and AC "UP".  Should they all
    be "Up"?

  - Sec 16: s/Author's/Authors'

  - There are a couple of places where " , " should be changed to ", "
Tim Polk Former IESG member
(was Discuss) No Objection
No Objection ()