Skip to main content

Using OpenPGP Keys for Transport Layer Security (TLS) Authentication
RFC 6091

Yes

(Sean Turner)

No Objection

Lars Eggert
(Adrian Farrel)
(Alexey Melnikov)
(Dan Romascanu)
(Gonzalo Camarillo)
(Jari Arkko)
(Peter Saint-Andre)
(Ralph Droms)
(Robert Sparks)
(Ron Bonica)
(Russ Housley)
(Stewart Bryant)

Note: This ballot was opened for revision 09 and is now closed.

Lars Eggert No Objection

(Sean Turner; former steering group member) Yes

Yes ()

                            

(Adrian Farrel; former steering group member) (was Discuss) No Objection

No Objection ()

                            

(Alexey Melnikov; former steering group member) (was Discuss) No Objection

No Objection ()

                            

(Dan Romascanu; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ()

                            

(Gonzalo Camarillo; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ()

                            

(Jari Arkko; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ()

                            

(Peter Saint-Andre; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ()

                            

(Ralph Droms; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ()

                            

(Robert Sparks; former steering group member) (was Discuss) No Objection

No Objection ()

                            

(Ron Bonica; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ()

                            

(Russ Housley; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ()

                            

(Stewart Bryant; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ()

                            

(Tim Polk; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection (2010-09-23)
I support Adrian's discuss position; the document should clearly state that it defines a new cert_type and
the associated processing rules, rather than define a new extension.

As to Alexey's discuss, I do not believe reuse of the previously assigned experimental type is justified.  We have
far more values available than we should ever use, so the interoperability concerns should trump any other issues.
This specification should request a new value.