Using OpenPGP Keys for Transport Layer Security (TLS) Authentication
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 09 and is now closed.
(Sean Turner) Yes
(Jari Arkko) No Objection
(Ron Bonica) No Objection
(Stewart Bryant) No Objection
(Gonzalo Camarillo) No Objection
(Ralph Droms) No Objection
(Lars Eggert) No Objection
(Adrian Farrel) (was Discuss) No Objection
(Russ Housley) No Objection
(Alexey Melnikov) (was Discuss) No Objection
(Tim Polk) No Objection
Comment (2010-09-23 for -)
I support Adrian's discuss position; the document should clearly state that it defines a new cert_type and the associated processing rules, rather than define a new extension. As to Alexey's discuss, I do not believe reuse of the previously assigned experimental type is justified. We have far more values available than we should ever use, so the interoperability concerns should trump any other issues. This specification should request a new value.