On the Implementation of the TCP Urgent Mechanism
RFC 6093

Revision differences

Document history

Date Rev. By Action
2015-10-14
07 (System) Notify list changed from tcpm-chairs@ietf.org, draft-ietf-tcpm-urgent-data@ietf.org to (None)
2012-08-22
07 (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the Yes position for Jari Arkko
2012-08-22
07 (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Tim Polk
2012-08-22
07 (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Ronald Bonica
2011-01-04
07 Cindy Morgan State changed to RFC Published from RFC Ed Queue.
2011-01-04
07 Cindy Morgan [Note]: changed to 'RFC 6093'
2011-01-04
07 (System) RFC published
2010-10-25
07 Amy Vezza State changed to RFC Ed Queue from Approved-announcement sent by Amy Vezza
2010-10-22
07 (System) IANA Action state changed to No IC from In Progress
2010-10-22
07 (System) IANA Action state changed to In Progress
2010-10-22
07 Amy Vezza IESG state changed to Approved-announcement sent
2010-10-22
07 Amy Vezza IESG has approved the document
2010-10-22
07 Amy Vezza Closed "Approve" ballot
2010-10-21
07 Lars Eggert State changed to Approved-announcement to be sent from IESG Evaluation::AD Followup by Lars Eggert
2010-10-21
07 Tim Polk [Ballot Position Update] Position for Tim Polk has been changed to No Objection from Discuss by Tim Polk
2010-10-16
07 Jari Arkko [Ballot Position Update] Position for Jari Arkko has been changed to Yes from Discuss by Jari Arkko
2010-10-15
07 (System) Sub state has been changed to AD Follow up from New Id Needed
2010-10-15
07 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-tcpm-urgent-data-07.txt
2010-09-29
07 Ron Bonica [Ballot Position Update] Position for Ron Bonica has been changed to No Objection from Discuss by Ron Bonica
2010-09-24
07 (System) Removed from agenda for telechat - 2010-09-23
2010-09-23
07 Cindy Morgan State changed to IESG Evaluation::Revised ID Needed from IESG Evaluation by Cindy Morgan
2010-09-23
07 Robert Sparks [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Robert Sparks
2010-09-23
07 Sean Turner [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Sean Turner
2010-09-23
07 Gonzalo Camarillo [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Gonzalo Camarillo
2010-09-23
07 Ron Bonica
[Ballot discuss]
This is a discuss-discuss. This sounds like a feature that never really worked. Applications have been discouraged from using it for years. Many ...
2010-09-23
07 Ron Bonica [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded by Ron Bonica
2010-09-23
07 Dan Romascanu [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Dan Romascanu
2010-09-23
07 Jari Arkko
[Ballot comment]
> This means that if this
> sysctl is set, an application might be unable to interoperate with
> itself if both the ...
2010-09-23
07 Jari Arkko
[Ballot discuss]
This is GREAT document, thank you for writing it. I am reading
it very carefully due to the importance of the Updates clause. ...
2010-09-23
07 Jari Arkko
[Ballot comment]
> This means that if this
> sysctl is set, an application might be unable to interoperate with
> itself if both the ...
2010-09-23
07 Jari Arkko
[Ballot discuss]
This is GREAT document, thank you for writing it. I am reading
it very carefully due to the importance of the Updates clause. ...
2010-09-22
07 Jari Arkko
[Ballot comment]
Some questions from a review by Ari Keranen:

3.2. Semantics of the Urgent Pointer

    [...] For example, Linux provides the sysctl ...
2010-09-22
07 Jari Arkko
[Ballot discuss]
This is GREAT document, thank you for writing it. I am reading
it very carefully due to the importance of the Updates clause. ...
2010-09-22
07 Jari Arkko [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded by Jari Arkko
2010-09-22
07 Jari Arkko
[Ballot comment]
Some questions from a review by Ari Keranen:

3.2. Semantics of the Urgent Pointer

    [...] For example, Linux provides the sysctl ...
2010-09-22
07 Peter Saint-Andre
[Ballot comment]
1. Section 2.1 states:

  TCP incorporates an "urgent mechanism" that allows the sending user
  to stimulate the receiving user to accept ...
2010-09-22
07 Peter Saint-Andre [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Peter Saint-Andre
2010-09-22
07 Amy Vezza State changed to IESG Evaluation from In Last Call by Amy Vezza
2010-09-22
07 Tim Polk
[Ballot comment]
While consistent with RFC 793, I found the references to "user" in section 2.1 (paragraphs 1 and 2) a little odd.  Is
this ...
2010-09-22
07 Tim Polk
[Ballot discuss]
This is a discuss-discuss.  To be clear, I am not requesting any changes in the document at this time.  I would
like to ...
2010-09-22
07 Tim Polk [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded by Tim Polk
2010-09-21
07 Adrian Farrel [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Adrian Farrel
2010-09-21
07 Ralph Droms
[Ballot comment]
Section 2.1 (editorial): are "sending user" and "receiving user" typical
terms in specifications of urgent data; do they imply human users?  Would
"sender" ...
2010-09-21
07 Ralph Droms
[Ballot comment]
Section 2.1 (editorial): are "sending user" and "receiving user" typical terms in specifications of urgent data; do they imply human users?  Would "sender" ...
2010-09-21
07 Ralph Droms [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Ralph Droms
2010-09-20
07 Alexey Melnikov
[Ballot comment]
3.4.  Interaction of middle-boxes with TCP urgent indications

  This should discourage
  applications from depending on urgent indications for their correct
  ...
2010-09-20
07 Alexey Melnikov [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Alexey Melnikov
2010-09-18
07 Russ Housley [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Russ Housley
2010-09-15
07 Samuel Weiler Request for Last Call review by SECDIR Completed. Reviewer: Dave Cridland.
2010-09-14
07 Amanda Baber We understand that this document doesn't require any IANA actions.
2010-09-11
07 Samuel Weiler Request for Last Call review by SECDIR is assigned to Dave Cridland
2010-09-11
07 Samuel Weiler Request for Last Call review by SECDIR is assigned to Dave Cridland
2010-09-07
07 Amy Vezza Last call sent
2010-09-07
07 Amy Vezza State changed to In Last Call from Last Call Requested by Amy Vezza
2010-09-07
07 Lars Eggert Placed on agenda for telechat - 2010-09-23 by Lars Eggert
2010-09-07
07 Lars Eggert Last Call was requested by Lars Eggert
2010-09-07
07 Lars Eggert State changed to Last Call Requested from AD Evaluation by Lars Eggert
2010-09-07
07 Lars Eggert [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Lars Eggert
2010-09-07
07 Lars Eggert Ballot has been issued by Lars Eggert
2010-09-07
07 Lars Eggert Created "Approve" ballot
2010-09-07
07 (System) Ballot writeup text was added
2010-09-07
07 (System) Last call text was added
2010-09-07
07 (System) Ballot approval text was added
2010-09-07
07 Lars Eggert State changed to AD Evaluation from Publication Requested by Lars Eggert
2010-09-07
07 Lars Eggert Responsible AD has been changed to Lars Eggert from Jari Arkko by Lars Eggert
2010-09-03
07 Amy Vezza [Note]: 'Wesley Eddy (Wesley.M.Eddy@nasa.gov) is the document shepherd.' added by Amy Vezza
2010-09-03
07 Amy Vezza
draft-ietf-tcpm-urgent-data
 
  (1.a) Who is the Document Shepherd for this document? Has the
        Document Shepherd personally reviewed this version of ...
2010-09-03
07 Amy Vezza Draft Added by Amy Vezza in state Publication Requested
2010-08-23
06 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-tcpm-urgent-data-06.txt
2010-03-05
05 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-tcpm-urgent-data-05.txt
2010-03-04
04 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-tcpm-urgent-data-04.txt
2010-02-20
03 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-tcpm-urgent-data-03.txt
2009-11-26
02 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-tcpm-urgent-data-02.txt
2009-11-10
01 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-tcpm-urgent-data-01.txt
2009-05-20
00 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-tcpm-urgent-data-00.txt