Summary of Cryptographic Authentication Algorithm Implementation Requirements for Routing Protocols
RFC 6094

Revision differences

Document history

Date Rev. By Action
2015-10-14 04 (System) Notify list changed from opsec-chairs@ietf.org, draft-ietf-opsec-igp-crypto-requirements@ietf.org to (None)
2012-08-22 04 (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Sean Turner
2012-08-22 04 (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Robert Sparks
2012-08-22 04 (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Tim Polk
2011-02-03 04 Cindy Morgan State changed to RFC Published from RFC Ed Queue.
2011-02-03 04 Cindy Morgan [Note]: changed to 'RFC 6094'
2011-02-02 04 (System) RFC published
2010-11-09 04 Cindy Morgan State changed to RFC Ed Queue from Approved-announcement sent by Cindy Morgan
2010-11-01 04 (System) IANA Action state changed to No IC from In Progress
2010-11-01 04 (System) IANA Action state changed to In Progress
2010-11-01 04 Cindy Morgan IESG state changed to Approved-announcement sent
2010-11-01 04 Cindy Morgan IESG has approved the document
2010-11-01 04 Cindy Morgan Closed "Approve" ballot
2010-10-28 04 Ron Bonica State Changes to Approved-announcement to be sent from IESG Evaluation::AD Followup by Ron Bonica
2010-10-28 04 Tim Polk [Ballot Position Update] Position for Tim Polk has been changed to No Objection from Discuss by Tim Polk
2010-10-12 04 Sean Turner [Ballot Position Update] Position for Sean Turner has been changed to No Objection from Discuss by Sean Turner
2010-10-11 04 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-opsec-igp-crypto-requirements-04.txt
2010-10-09 03 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-opsec-igp-crypto-requirements-03.txt
2010-10-08 04 Robert Sparks [Ballot Position Update] Position for Robert Sparks has been changed to No Objection from Discuss by Robert Sparks
2010-10-01 02 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-opsec-igp-crypto-requirements-02.txt
2010-09-29 04 Adrian Farrel [Ballot Position Update] Position for Adrian Farrel has been changed to Yes from Discuss by Adrian Farrel
2010-09-29 04 Adrian Farrel
[Ballot comment]
Moved one small point from my previous Discuss. WOuld be nice to get it fixed.

You have caught most cases of ...

  In ...
2010-09-29 04 Adrian Farrel [Ballot discuss]
2010-09-27 04 (System) Sub state has been changed to AD Follow up from New Id Needed
2010-09-27 01 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-opsec-igp-crypto-requirements-01.txt
2010-09-24 04 (System) Removed from agenda for telechat - 2010-09-23
2010-09-23 04 Cindy Morgan State changed to IESG Evaluation::Revised ID Needed from Waiting for AD Go-Ahead by Cindy Morgan
2010-09-23 04 Tim Polk
[Ballot discuss]
[updated to remove one issue]

In section 4.2, Authentication Algorithm Selection (in the OSPFv2 section) states:

    Implementations must provide support ...
2010-09-23 04 Tim Polk [Ballot comment]
I support Sean's discuss issue #4
2010-09-23 04 Tim Polk
[Ballot discuss]
Discuss-Discuss:

I could not sort out the real goals of this document.  I am unsure whether we are setting the stage for ...
2010-09-23 04 Sean Turner
[Ballot comment]
1) The RFC editor will make you scrub the references (i.e., [RFCXYZ]) from the abstract.  Move them to the Introduction.

2 ...
2010-09-23 04 Sean Turner
[Ballot discuss]
1) Is this draft supposed to be a BCP instead of informational?  In the title it has "Best Practices" and in the ...
2010-09-23 04 Gonzalo Camarillo [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Gonzalo Camarillo
2010-09-23 04 Tim Polk
[Ballot discuss]
In section 4.2, Authentication Algorithm Selection (in the OSPFv2 section) states:

    Implementations must provide support for
  HMAC-SHA-256 as this ...
2010-09-23 04 Tim Polk [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded by Tim Polk
2010-09-23 04 Sean Turner
[Ballot comment]
These are drafty:

1) The RFC editor will make you scrub the references (i.e., [RFCXYZ]) from the abstract.  Move them to ...
2010-09-23 04 Sean Turner
[Ballot discuss]
1) Is this draft supposed to be a BCP instead of informational?  In the title it has "Best Practices" and in the ...
2010-09-23 04 Dan Romascanu [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Dan Romascanu
2010-09-22 04 Robert Sparks
[Ballot discuss]
Amplifying others' discusses on the use of 2119 language in this document - as written, this document appears to be profiling other protocols, relaxing ...
2010-09-22 04 Robert Sparks [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded by Robert Sparks
2010-09-22 04 Sean Turner
[Ballot comment]
These are drafty:

1) The RFC editor will make you scrub the references (i.e., [RFCXYZ]) from the abstract.  Move them to ...
2010-09-22 04 Ralph Droms
[Ballot comment]
For consistency, add citations to the defining RFCs that define the use of
HMAC-SHA-256/HMAC-SHA-384/HMAC-SHA-512 in the various routing protocols; e.g ...
2010-09-22 04 Ralph Droms
[Ballot comment]
For consistency, add citations to the defining RFCs that define the use of HMAC-SHA-256/HMAC-SHA-384/HMAC-SHA-512 in the various routing protocols; e.g ...
2010-09-22 04 Ralph Droms [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Ralph Droms
2010-09-22 04 Lars Eggert
[Ballot comment]
INTRODUCTION, paragraph 3:
>            Cryptographic Authentication Algorithm Implementation
>                    ...
2010-09-22 04 Lars Eggert [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Lars Eggert
2010-09-21 04 Adrian Farrel
[Ballot comment]
Nit: Section 1

  It should be recognized that preferred algorithm(s) will change over
  time in to adapt to the evolving ...
2010-09-21 04 Adrian Farrel
[Ballot discuss]
I would like to  "Yes" on this document because I think it is a
valuable and important piece of work, but there is ...
2010-09-21 04 Adrian Farrel [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded by Adrian Farrel
2010-09-21 04 Sean Turner
[Ballot comment]
These are drafty:

1) The RFC editor will make you scrub the references (i.e., [RFCXYZ]) from the abstract.  Move them to ...
2010-09-21 04 Sean Turner
[Ballot discuss]
These are drafty:

1) Not entirely sure of this draft's point.  2119 requirements language is used only to specify what's ...
2010-09-21 04 Sean Turner
[Ballot discuss]
This is draft:

1) Not entirely sure of this drafts point.  2119 requirements language is used only to specify what's already ...
2010-09-21 04 Sean Turner
[Ballot comment]
These are drafts

1) The RFC editor will make you scrub the references (i.e., [RFCXYZ]) from the abstract.  Just move them ...
2010-09-21 04 Sean Turner
[Ballot discuss]
This is draft:

1) Not entirely sure of this drafts point.  2119 requirements language is used only to specify what's already ...
2010-09-21 04 Sean Turner
[Ballot comment]
These are drafts

1) The RFC editor will make you scrub the references (i.e., [RFCXYZ]) from the abstract.  Just move them ...
2010-09-21 04 Sean Turner [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded by Sean Turner
2010-09-21 04 Sean Turner [Ballot comment]
1) The RFC editor will make you scrub the references (i.e., [RFCXYZ]) from the abstract.  Just move them to the Introduction.
2010-09-19 04 Russ Housley
[Ballot comment]
Two spellings are used: "Null authentication" and "NULL
  authentication".  Please pick one.

  In the Introduction, I think it is better ...
2010-09-19 04 Russ Housley [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Russ Housley
2010-09-15 04 Samuel Weiler Request for Last Call review by SECDIR Completed. Reviewer: Sam Weiler.
2010-09-07 04 Amy Vezza State changed to Waiting for AD Go-Ahead from In Last Call by Amy Vezza
2010-09-06 04 Ron Bonica [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Ronald Bonica
2010-09-06 04 Ron Bonica Ballot has been issued by Ron Bonica
2010-09-06 04 Ron Bonica Created "Approve" ballot
2010-09-06 04 Ron Bonica Placed on agenda for telechat - 2010-09-23 by Ron Bonica
2010-08-30 04 Samuel Weiler Request for Last Call review by SECDIR is assigned to Sam Weiler
2010-08-27 04 Amanda Baber IANA understands that this document doesn't require any actions.
2010-08-20 04 Cindy Morgan Last call sent
2010-08-20 04 Cindy Morgan State changed to In Last Call from Last Call Requested by Cindy Morgan
2010-08-20 04 Ron Bonica Last Call was requested by Ron Bonica
2010-08-20 04 (System) Ballot writeup text was added
2010-08-20 04 (System) Last call text was added
2010-08-20 04 (System) Ballot approval text was added
2010-08-20 04 Ron Bonica State Changes to Last Call Requested from Publication Requested by Ron Bonica
2010-07-12 04 Cindy Morgan [Note]: 'Joel Jaeggli (joelja@bogus.com) is the document shepherd.' added by Cindy Morgan
2010-07-12 04 Cindy Morgan
1.a

The Document Shepherd is Joel Jaeggli, Opsec WG co-chair. The Document
Shepherd has reviewed Draft 00 of
draft-ietf-opsec-igp-crypto-requirements and concluded that the
document ...
2010-07-12 04 Cindy Morgan Draft Added by Cindy Morgan in state Publication Requested
2010-01-29 00 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-opsec-igp-crypto-requirements-00.txt