Registration for Multiple Phone Numbers in the Session Initiation Protocol (SIP)
RFC 6140

Note: This ballot was opened for revision 13 and is now closed.

Lars Eggert No Objection

(Gonzalo Camarillo; former steering group member) Yes

Yes ( for -)
No email
send info

(Robert Sparks; former steering group member) Yes

Yes (2011-01-19 for -)
No email
send info
The examples in section 8 have bugs that are important to fix before publication.
The Call-ID changes unintentionally in each example. The messages that have two Via header field values have the values in the wrong order.

(Adrian Farrel; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection (2011-01-20 for -)
No email
send info
AOR is used without expansion in the abstract.

(Alexey Melnikov; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection (2011-01-19 for -)
No email
send info
In Section 7.1.2:

   All base64 encoding discussed in the following sections MUST use the
   character set and encoding defined in RFC 2045 [1],

RFC 4648 is a better reference here.

   except that any
   trailing "=" characters are discarded on encoding, and added as
   necessary to decode.


In Section 7.1.2.1:

SHA256-80 needs a reference and an explanation (i.e. that the output of the hash function
is truncated to 80 bits).


The first reference to TLS needs an Informative reference.

(Dan Romascanu; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection (2011-01-18 for -)
No email
send info
The OPS-DIR review by Warren Kumari signalled a number of nits which would be useful to fix: 

Abstract:
In the abstract many acronyms are expanded (SIP, SIP-PBX, UA), but AOR is not. Having them all expanded (or none expanded) would be nice.

Section 4:
Globally Routable UA URI's (GRUU) are first mentioned, but the reference to the RFC is in section 7.1.


Section 5.1:
Acronym "UAC" not expanded / defined.


Section 6:
s/An SSP using this mechanism/A SSP using this mechanism/


Section 7.1.2.1 (indented):
s/The registrar maintains a counter, I. this counter is/The registrar maintains a counter, I. This counter is/ (Capitalization of 't').

(David Harrington; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ( for -)
No email
send info

(Peter Saint-Andre; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ( for -)
No email
send info

(Ralph Droms; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ( for -)
No email
send info

(Ron Bonica; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ( for -)
No email
send info

(Russ Housley; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ( for -)
No email
send info

(Sean Turner; former steering group member) (was Discuss) No Objection

No Objection (2011-01-20)
No email
send info
(author adding some text) Section 7.1.2.2: Seems like there should be a pointer to RFC 4086 for the "D" method.

(Stewart Bryant; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ( for -)
No email
send info