IMAP LIST Extension for Special-Use Mailboxes
RFC 6154
Yes
No Objection
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 06 and is now closed.
Lars Eggert No Objection
(Alexey Melnikov; former steering group member) Yes
(Adrian Farrel; former steering group member) No Objection
I don't think it is appropriate to use RFC2119 terminology in the Abstract. It is probably also not appropriate in the Introduction. --- It would be nice to capitalise the section headings. --- Section 7 LIST response: There are no security issues with conveying special- use information to a client. Really. Doesn't the exchange of information imply that there is potential to intercept the information. Knowledge of the message store usage may be valuable to someone attempting to access messages.
(Dan Romascanu; former steering group member) No Objection
(David Harrington; former steering group member) No Objection
(Gonzalo Camarillo; former steering group member) No Objection
(Jari Arkko; former steering group member) No Objection
(Peter Saint-Andre; former steering group member) (was Discuss) No Objection
(Ralph Droms; former steering group member) (was Discuss) No Objection
(Robert Sparks; former steering group member) No Objection
(Ron Bonica; former steering group member) No Objection
(Russ Housley; former steering group member) No Objection
(Sean Turner; former steering group member) (was Discuss) No Objection
(Stewart Bryant; former steering group member) No Objection
(Tim Polk; former steering group member) No Objection