IPv6 Transition in the Session Initiation Protocol (SIP)
RFC 6157

Note: This ballot was opened for revision 07 and is now closed.

(Jari Arkko) (was Discuss) Yes

(Jon Peterson) Yes

(Ron Bonica) No Objection

(Ross Callon) No Objection

(Lisa Dusseault) No Objection

(Lars Eggert) No Objection

Comment (2007-07-13 for -)
No email
send info
Section 3.1., paragraph 0:
> 3.1.  Proxy Behavior

  If IPv6 transition capabilities depend on the presence of v4/v6
  proxies (and DNS entries, etc.), the document should REQUIRE their
  presence, rather than merely RECOMMEND them. (Or is there another IPv6
  transition mechanism that doesn't require this?)

(Sam Hartman) No Objection

(Russ Housley) No Objection

Comment (2007-07-16 for -)
No email
send info
  Based on Gen-ART Review by Suresh Krishnan

  Since the document mentions usage of dual stack it makes sense to
  add an informative reference to RFC4213.

(Cullen Jennings) No Objection

(Chris Newman) No Objection

(Tim Polk) (was Discuss) No Objection

(Dan Romascanu) No Objection

(Mark Townsley) No Objection

(David Ward) No Objection

Magnus Westerlund No Objection