IPv6 Transition in the Session Initiation Protocol (SIP)
RFC 6157
Yes
No Objection
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 07 and is now closed.
Lars Eggert No Objection
Section 3.1., paragraph 0: > 3.1. Proxy Behavior If IPv6 transition capabilities depend on the presence of v4/v6 proxies (and DNS entries, etc.), the document should REQUIRE their presence, rather than merely RECOMMEND them. (Or is there another IPv6 transition mechanism that doesn't require this?)
(Jari Arkko; former steering group member) (was Discuss) Yes
(Jon Peterson; former steering group member) Yes
(Chris Newman; former steering group member) No Objection
(Cullen Jennings; former steering group member) No Objection
(Dan Romascanu; former steering group member) No Objection
(David Ward; former steering group member) No Objection
(Lisa Dusseault; former steering group member) No Objection
(Magnus Westerlund; former steering group member) No Objection
(Mark Townsley; former steering group member) No Objection
(Ron Bonica; former steering group member) No Objection
(Ross Callon; former steering group member) No Objection
(Russ Housley; former steering group member) No Objection
Based on Gen-ART Review by Suresh Krishnan Since the document mentions usage of dual stack it makes sense to add an informative reference to RFC4213.
(Sam Hartman; former steering group member) No Objection
(Tim Polk; former steering group member) (was Discuss) No Objection