Session-Specific Explicit Diameter Request Routing
RFC 6159

Revision differences

Document history

Date Rev. By Action
2015-10-14
05 (System) Notify list changed from tena@huawei.com, gwz@net-zen.net, tom111.taylor@bell.net, draft-tsou-diameter-explicit-routing@ietf.org to (None)
2012-08-22
05 (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Sean Turner
2012-08-22
05 (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the Yes position for Jari Arkko
2012-08-22
05 (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Tim Polk
2012-08-22
05 (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Ralph Droms
2012-08-22
05 (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Adrian Farrel
2012-08-22
05 (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Russ Housley
2011-04-15
05 Cindy Morgan State changed to RFC Published from RFC Ed Queue.
2011-04-15
05 Cindy Morgan [Note]: 'RFC 6159' added
2011-04-14
05 (System) RFC published
2010-12-22
05 Amy Vezza State changed to RFC Ed Queue from Approved-announcement sent.
2010-12-14
05 Cindy Morgan IESG state changed to Approved-announcement sent
2010-12-14
05 Cindy Morgan IESG has approved the document
2010-12-14
05 Cindy Morgan Closed "Approve" ballot
2010-12-14
05 Cindy Morgan Approval announcement text changed
2010-12-14
05 Cindy Morgan Approval announcement text changed
2010-12-14
05 Cindy Morgan Approval announcement text regenerated
2010-12-14
05 Cindy Morgan Ballot writeup text changed
2010-12-14
05 Russ Housley State changed to Approved-announcement to be sent from IESG Evaluation::AD Followup.
2010-12-03
05 (System) Removed from agenda for telechat - 2010-12-02
2010-12-02
05 Jari Arkko [Ballot Position Update] Position for Jari Arkko has been changed to Yes from Discuss by Jari Arkko
2010-12-02
05 Cindy Morgan State changed to IESG Evaluation::AD Followup from IESG Evaluation.
2010-12-02
05 Russ Housley Ballot writeup text changed
2010-12-02
05 Ralph Droms [Ballot Position Update] Position for Ralph Droms has been changed to No Objection from Discuss
2010-12-02
05 Sean Turner [Ballot Position Update] Position for Sean Turner has been changed to No Objection from Discuss
2010-12-02
05 Tim Polk [Ballot Position Update] Position for Tim Polk has been changed to No Objection from Discuss
2010-12-02
05 Russ Housley
[Ballot discuss]
The proposed note ends with: "The IESG also does not know of any
  information on record that such work is needed as ...
2010-12-02
05 Russ Housley [Ballot Position Update] Position for Russ Housley has been changed to No Objection from Discuss
2010-12-02
05 Russ Housley Note field has been cleared
2010-12-02
05 Russ Housley Ballot writeup text changed
2010-12-02
05 Adrian Farrel [Ballot comment]
Clearing my Discuss after discussion with the IESG.
2010-12-02
05 Adrian Farrel [Ballot Position Update] Position for Adrian Farrel has been changed to No Objection from Discuss
2010-12-02
05 Sean Turner [Ballot discuss]
I like the combination of Jari's note and the text removal suggestions by both Russ and Ralph.
2010-12-02
05 Sean Turner [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded
2010-12-02
05 Tim Polk [Ballot discuss]
I support Jari's proposed note.
2010-12-02
05 Tim Polk [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded
2010-12-02
05 Gonzalo Camarillo [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded
2010-12-02
05 Ralph Droms
[Ballot discuss]
I agree with Jari's DISCUSS position.  I suggest an additional requirement (3), that the following text is removed from the second ...
2010-12-02
05 Russ Housley
[Ballot discuss]
The proposed note ends with: "The IESG also does not know of any
  information on record that such work is needed as ...
2010-12-02
05 Russ Housley [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded
2010-12-02
05 Ralph Droms
[Ballot discuss]
I agree with Jari's DISCUSS position.

I also want to see this text removed from the second paragraph of the Introduction:

  ...
2010-12-02
05 Ralph Droms [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded
2010-12-02
05 Jari Arkko
[Ballot discuss]
I do not think that we should publish a document that says it is a basis
for a standardized extension, and it is ...
2010-12-02
05 Jari Arkko [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded by Jari Arkko
2010-12-02
05 Adrian Farrel
[Ballot discuss]
This is a Discuss-Discuss and does not require any action from the authors.

I am not an expert on this protocol and would ...
2010-12-02
05 Adrian Farrel [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded
2010-12-01
05 Peter Saint-Andre [Ballot Position Update] New position, Abstain, has been recorded
2010-11-30
05 Lars Eggert [Ballot comment]
No objection with the proposed IESG Note.
2010-11-30
05 Lars Eggert [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded
2010-11-29
05 Amanda Baber
[Note]: '''The IESG has concluded that this work is related to IETF work done in the Diameter Maintenance and Extensions (DIME) WG, but this relationship ...
2010-11-29
05 Amanda Baber We understand that this document does not require any IANA actions.
2010-11-29
05 Stewart Bryant [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded
2010-11-24
05 Amy Vezza State changed to IESG Evaluation from Publication Requested.
2010-11-24
05 Dan Romascanu Ballot has been issued
2010-11-24
05 Dan Romascanu [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Dan Romascanu
2010-11-24
05 Dan Romascanu Ballot has been issued
2010-11-24
05 Dan Romascanu Created "Approve" ballot
2010-11-24
05 (System) Ballot writeup text was added
2010-11-24
05 (System) Last call text was added
2010-11-24
05 (System) Ballot approval text was added
2010-11-24
05 Dan Romascanu
[Note]: changed to ''The IESG has concluded that this work is related to IETF work done in the Diameter Maintenance and Extensions (DIME) WG, but ...
2010-11-24
05 Dan Romascanu Ballot writeup text changed
2010-11-24
05 Dan Romascanu Placed on agenda for telechat - 2010-12-02
2010-11-24
05 Dan Romascanu
[Note]: ''The IESG has concluded that this work is related to IETF work done in the Diameter Maintenance and Extensions (DIME) WG, but this relationship ...
2010-11-18
05 Cindy Morgan Responsible AD has been changed to Dan Romascanu from Russ Housley
2010-10-28
05 Cindy Morgan
The draft draft-tsou-diameter-explicit-routing-05
is ready for publication from the Independent Stream.
Please ask IESG to review it, as set out in RFC 5742.

The following ...
2010-10-28
05 Cindy Morgan Draft added in state Publication Requested by Cindy Morgan
2010-10-28
05 Cindy Morgan Placed on agenda for telechat - 2010-11-18 by Cindy Morgan
2010-06-21
05 (System) New version available: draft-tsou-diameter-explicit-routing-05.txt
2010-02-25
04 (System) New version available: draft-tsou-diameter-explicit-routing-04.txt
2009-08-06
03 (System) New version available: draft-tsou-diameter-explicit-routing-03.txt
2009-07-13
02 (System) New version available: draft-tsou-diameter-explicit-routing-02.txt
2009-03-09
01 (System) New version available: draft-tsou-diameter-explicit-routing-01.txt
2009-03-05
00 (System) New version available: draft-tsou-diameter-explicit-routing-00.txt