Using 127-Bit IPv6 Prefixes on Inter-Router Links
RFC 6164
Yes
No Objection
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 01 and is now closed.
Lars Eggert No Objection
Section 6., paragraph 3: > a) Addresses with all zeros in the rightmost 64 bits SHOULD NOT be > assigned as unicast addresses, to avoid colliding with the Subnet- > Router anycast address [RFC4291]. > > b) Addresses in which the rightmost 64 bits are assigned the > highest 128 values, (i.e., ffff:ffff:ffff:ff7f to ffff:ffff:ffff: > ffff), SHOULD NOT be used as unicast addresses to avoid colliding > with Reserved Subnet Anycast Addresses [RFC2526]. Any reason these are not MUST NOTs?
(Jari Arkko; former steering group member) Yes
(Robert Sparks; former steering group member) Yes
(Ron Bonica; former steering group member) Yes
(Adrian Farrel; former steering group member) (was Discuss) No Objection
(Alexey Melnikov; former steering group member) No Objection
(Dan Romascanu; former steering group member) No Objection
(Gonzalo Camarillo; former steering group member) No Objection
(Peter Saint-Andre; former steering group member) No Objection
(Ralph Droms; former steering group member) (was Discuss) No Objection
Pedantic, editorial nits about this text from the introduction: address, except those that start with the binary value 000, s/address/addresses/ s/those/those unicast addresses/ (to clarify that "those" == addresses and not IIDs)
(Russ Housley; former steering group member) No Objection
(Sean Turner; former steering group member) No Objection
#1) Sec 3: s/does not apply/do not apply #2) Sec 5.1: s/which uses medium/which use a medium
(Tim Polk; former steering group member) No Objection