datatracker.ietf.org
Sign in
Version 5.3.0, 2014-04-12
Report a bug

A Registry for PIM Message Types
RFC 6166

Diffs

Document history

DateVersionByText
2012-08-22 RFC (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Robert Sparks
2012-08-22 RFC (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Dan Romascanu
2011-04-26 RFC Cindy Morgan State changed to RFC Published from RFC Ed Queue.
2011-04-26 RFC Cindy Morgan [Note]: changed to 'RFC 6166'
2011-04-25 RFC (System) RFC published
2011-03-10 04 (System) IANA Action state changed to RFC-Ed-Ack from Waiting on RFC Editor
2011-03-09 04 (System) IANA Action state changed to Waiting on RFC Editor from In Progress
2011-03-02 04 (System) IANA Action state changed to In Progress from Waiting on Authors
2011-03-02 04 (System) IANA Action state changed to Waiting on Authors from In Progress
2011-02-25 04 (System) IANA Action state changed to In Progress
2011-02-23 04 Cindy Morgan State changed to RFC Ed Queue from Approved-announcement sent.
2011-02-23 04 Amy Vezza IESG state changed to Approved-announcement sent
2011-02-23 04 Amy Vezza IESG has approved the document
2011-02-23 04 Amy Vezza Closed "Approve" ballot
2011-02-23 04 Adrian Farrel Approval announcement text changed
2011-02-23 04 Adrian Farrel Approval announcement text changed
2011-02-23 04 Adrian Farrel Approval announcement text regenerated
2011-02-23 04 Adrian Farrel Ballot writeup text changed
2011-02-17 04 Cindy Morgan Removed from agenda for telechat
2011-02-17 04 Cindy Morgan State changed to Approved-announcement to be sent::Point Raised - writeup needed from IESG Evaluation.
2011-02-17 04 (System) [Ballot Position Update] Position for Robert Sparks has been changed to No Objection from Discuss by IESG Secretary
2011-02-17 04 Dan Romascanu
[Ballot comment]
> 3.2.  Assignment of new message types

>    Assignment of new message types is done according to the "IETF
  Review" model, see [RFC5226].

Adding ...[show all]
2011-02-17 04 Dan Romascanu [Ballot Position Update] Position for Dan Romascanu has been changed to No Objection from Discuss
2011-02-17 04 Dan Romascanu
[Ballot discuss]
> 3.2.  Assignment of new message types

>    Assignment of new message types is done according to the "IETF
  Review" model, see [RFC5226].

Adding ...[show all]
2011-02-17 04 Dan Romascanu [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded
2011-02-17 04 Gonzalo Camarillo [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded
2011-02-17 04 Stewart Bryant [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded
2011-02-17 04 Jari Arkko [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded
2011-02-16 04 Tim Polk
[Ballot comment]
I can't remember if there is a precedent for registry documents achieving PS.  The decision to reserve the value 15 to support ...[show all]
2011-02-16 04 Tim Polk [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded
2011-02-16 04 Ralph Droms [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded
2011-02-15 04 Russ Housley [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded
2011-02-15 04 Robert Sparks
[Ballot discuss]
Why is the intended status PS? This isn't a candidate for progression on the standards ladder (an interop report will never make ...[show all]
2011-02-15 04 Robert Sparks [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded
2011-02-15 04 Lars Eggert
[Ballot comment]
Section 3.2., paragraph 1:
>    Assignment of new message types is done according to the "IETF
>    Review" model, see [RFC5226].

  It'd be ...[show all]
2011-02-15 04 Lars Eggert [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded
2011-02-14 04 Peter Saint-Andre [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded
2011-02-14 04 Ron Bonica [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded
2011-02-13 04 Adrian Farrel State changed to IESG Evaluation from Waiting for AD Go-Ahead.
2011-02-11 04 Alexey Melnikov [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded
2011-02-11 04 Sean Turner [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded
2011-01-31 04 Adrian Farrel Placed on agenda for telechat - 2011-02-17
2011-01-31 04 Adrian Farrel [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Adrian Farrel
2011-01-31 04 Adrian Farrel Ballot has been issued
2011-01-31 04 Adrian Farrel Created "Approve" ballot
2011-01-31 04 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-pim-registry-04.txt (diff from previous)
2011-01-25 03 (System) State changed to Waiting for AD Go-Ahead from In Last Call.
2011-01-24 03 Amanda Baber
Upon approval of this document, IANA understands that a new registry is
to be created using the following specifications.

The new registry will be the ...[show all]
2011-01-11 03 Amy Vezza Last call sent
2011-01-11 03 Amy Vezza
State changed to In Last Call from In Last Call.

The following Last Call Announcement was sent out:

From: The IESG <iesg-secretary@ietf.org>;
To ...[show all]
2011-01-11 03 Adrian Farrel Last Call text changed
2011-01-11 03 Adrian Farrel Intended Status has been changed to Proposed Standard from Informational
2011-01-11 03 Amy Vezza
State changed to In Last Call from Last Call Requested.

The following Last Call Announcement was sent out:

From: The IESG <iesg-secretary@ietf.org>;
To ...[show all]
2011-01-11 03 Adrian Farrel Last Call was requested
2011-01-11 03 Adrian Farrel State changed to Last Call Requested from AD Evaluation::AD Followup.
2011-01-11 03 Adrian Farrel Last Call text changed
2011-01-11 03 (System) Ballot writeup text was added
2011-01-11 03 (System) Last call text was added
2011-01-11 03 (System) Ballot approval text was added
2011-01-11 03 (System) Sub state has been changed to AD Follow up from New Id Needed
2011-01-11 03 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-pim-registry-03.txt (diff from previous)
2011-01-10 02 Adrian Farrel Ballot writeup text changed
2011-01-10 02 Adrian Farrel
State changed to AD Evaluation::Revised ID Needed from AD Evaluation.
AD Review

===

Hi,

Don't panic!

I have performed my AD review of your ...[show all]
2011-01-10 02 Adrian Farrel State changed to AD Evaluation from Publication Requested.
2011-01-10 02 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-pim-registry-02.txt (diff from previous)
2011-01-07 01 Cindy Morgan
> (1.a) Who is the Document Shepherd for this document? Has the
> Document Shepherd personally reviewed this version of the document
> and, in particular, does ...[show all]
2011-01-07 01 Cindy Morgan Draft Added by Cindy Morgan in state Publication Requested
2011-01-07 01 Cindy Morgan [Note]: 'Mike McBride (mmcbride@cisco.com) is the document shepherd.' added by Cindy Morgan
2010-10-25 01 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-pim-registry-01.txt (diff from previous)
2010-05-04 00 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-pim-registry-00.txt