URI Scheme for Java(tm) Message Service 1.0
RFC 6167

Note: This ballot was opened for revision 12 and is now closed.

Alexey Melnikov (was Discuss, Yes) Yes

(Ron Bonica) No Objection

(Stewart Bryant) No Objection

(Gonzalo Camarillo) No Objection

(Lars Eggert) No Objection

Comment (2011-01-17 for -)
INTRODUCTION, paragraph 4:
>    The syntax of this 'jms' URI is not compatible with any known current
>    vendor implementation, but the expressivity of the format should
>    permit all vendors to use it.

  So are there vendor implementations of 'jms' already? If yes, what it
  the value in publishing a specification that is not compatible with
  any of them? Or do we have an indication that the vendors will adopt
  this spec?

(Adrian Farrel) No Objection

(Russ Housley) No Objection

(Dan Romascanu) No Objection

(Peter Saint-Andre) No Objection

(Robert Sparks) No Objection

(Sean Turner) No Objection