Label Edge Router Forwarding of IPv4 Option Packets
RFC 6178

Revision differences

Document history

Date Rev. By Action
2015-10-14
07 (System) Notify list changed from mpls-chairs@ietf.org, draft-ietf-mpls-ip-options@ietf.org to (None)
2012-08-22
07 (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Lars Eggert
2012-08-22
07 (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Tim Polk
2012-08-22
07 (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for David Harrington
2012-08-22
07 (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the Yes position for Ronald Bonica
2011-03-16
07 Amy Vezza State changed to RFC Published from RFC Ed Queue.
2011-03-15
07 (System) RFC published
2011-01-04
07 (System) IANA Action state changed to No IC from In Progress
2011-01-04
07 (System) IANA Action state changed to In Progress
2011-01-04
07 Amy Vezza State changed to RFC Ed Queue from Approved-announcement sent.
2011-01-03
07 Amy Vezza IESG state changed to Approved-announcement sent
2011-01-03
07 Amy Vezza IESG has approved the document
2011-01-03
07 Amy Vezza Closed "Approve" ballot
2011-01-03
07 Amy Vezza State changed to Approved-announcement to be sent from IESG Evaluation::AD Followup.
2011-01-03
07 Amy Vezza Approval announcement text regenerated
2011-01-03
07 Amy Vezza Approval announcement text regenerated
2010-12-24
07 Adrian Farrel Ballot writeup text changed
2010-12-24
07 (System) Sub state has been changed to AD Follow up from New Id Needed
2010-12-24
07 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-mpls-ip-options-07.txt
2010-12-23
07 David Harrington [Ballot comment]
2010-12-23
07 David Harrington [Ballot discuss]
2010-12-23
07 David Harrington [Ballot Position Update] Position for David Harrington has been changed to No Objection from Discuss
2010-12-17
07 (System) Removed from agenda for telechat - 2010-12-16
2010-12-16
07 Amy Vezza State changed to IESG Evaluation::Revised ID Needed from IESG Evaluation.
2010-12-16
07 Tim Polk [Ballot Position Update] Position for Tim Polk has been changed to No Objection from Discuss
2010-12-16
07 Ron Bonica [Ballot Position Update] Position for Ron Bonica has been changed to Yes from Discuss
2010-12-16
07 Lars Eggert [Ballot Position Update] Position for Lars Eggert has been changed to No Objection from Discuss
2010-12-16
07 Amy Vezza Ballot writeup text changed
2010-12-16
07 Dan Romascanu [Ballot comment]
I support Ron's DISCUSS and item #1 in David's DISCUSS
2010-12-16
07 Dan Romascanu [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded
2010-12-16
07 Ralph Droms [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded
2010-12-16
07 Lars Eggert
[Ballot comment]
INTRODUCTION, paragraph 4:
>  Requirements for Label Edge Router Forwarding of IPv4 Option Packets

  This document isn't really about requirements, it ...
2010-12-16
07 Lars Eggert
[Ballot discuss]
Section 5.1., paragraph 3:
>    Further, IPv6 [RFC2460] makes use of extension headers not header
>    options and is therefore ...
2010-12-16
07 Lars Eggert [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded
2010-12-16
07 Gonzalo Camarillo [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded
2010-12-16
07 Jari Arkko [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded by Jari Arkko
2010-12-15
06 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-mpls-ip-options-06.txt
2010-12-15
07 Sean Turner [Ballot comment]
I support Dave's first and Tim's discuss position.
2010-12-15
07 Sean Turner [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded
2010-12-15
07 Tim Polk
[Ballot comment]
The conformance requirements could be stated more clearly.
In the abstract "invoked" seems to be the wrong word.  To me at least ...
2010-12-15
07 Tim Polk [Ballot discuss]
Nice document in general. Thanks!

One simple but discuss-worthy issue:

Shouldn't this update RFCs 3031 and 3032?
2010-12-15
07 Tim Polk [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded
2010-12-15
07 Russ Housley [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded
2010-12-14
07 Robert Sparks [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded
2010-12-14
07 Ron Bonica
[Ballot discuss]
This document attempts to fill a very important gap in the the standards. I look forward to changing this DISCUSS to a YES ...
2010-12-14
07 David Harrington
[Ballot discuss]
1) Why does this document not Update 3031 and 3032?

2) There is an assumption in this document that packets with IP options ...
2010-12-14
07 David Harrington
[Ballot comment]
Please consider addressing the issues rasied in the TSVDIR review by James Polk:

I've reviewed this document as part of the transport ...
2010-12-14
07 David Harrington
[Ballot discuss]
1) Why does this document not Update 3031 and 3032?

2) There is an assumption in this document that packets with IP options ...
2010-12-14
07 David Harrington [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded
2010-12-14
07 Ron Bonica
[Ballot comment]
- In the introduction, you say

"The IP packet header provides for various IP options as originally specified in [RFC791]."

Not all options are ...
2010-12-14
07 Ron Bonica
[Ballot comment]
- In the introduction, you say

"The IP packet header provides for various IP options as originally specified in [RFC791]."

Not all options are ...
2010-12-14
07 Ron Bonica
[Ballot comment]
- In the introduction, you say

"The IP packet header provides for various IP options as originally specified in [RFC791]."

Not all options are ...
2010-12-14
07 Ron Bonica
[Ballot comment]
- In the introduction, you say

"The IP packet header provides for various IP options as originally specified in [RFC791]."

Not all options are ...
2010-12-14
07 Ron Bonica
[Ballot discuss]
This document attempts to fill a very important gap in the the standards. I look forward to changing this DISCUSS to a YES ...
2010-12-14
07 Ron Bonica [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded
2010-12-13
07 Peter Saint-Andre [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded
2010-12-13
07 Stewart Bryant [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded
2010-12-13
07 Stewart Bryant
[Ballot comment]
In Section 4. Ingress Label Edge Router Requirement

"Further, how an ingress LER processes the IP header options of packets before MPLS encapsulation ...
2010-12-12
07 Alexey Melnikov [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded
2010-12-10
07 David Harrington Request for Telechat review by TSVDIR Completed. Reviewer: James Polk.
2010-12-08
07 David Harrington Request for Telechat review by TSVDIR is assigned to James Polk
2010-12-02
07 Adrian Farrel Placed on agenda for telechat - 2010-12-16
2010-12-02
07 Adrian Farrel State changed to IESG Evaluation from Waiting for AD Go-Ahead.
2010-12-02
07 Adrian Farrel [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Adrian Farrel
2010-12-02
07 Adrian Farrel Ballot has been issued
2010-12-02
07 Adrian Farrel Created "Approve" ballot
2010-11-30
07 (System) State changed to Waiting for AD Go-Ahead from In Last Call.
2010-11-22
07 Amanda Baber We understand that this document does not require any IANA actions.
2010-11-22
07 Samuel Weiler Request for Last Call review by SECDIR is assigned to Larry Zhu
2010-11-16
07 Cindy Morgan Last call sent
2010-11-16
07 Cindy Morgan
State changed to In Last Call from Last Call Requested.

The following Last Call Announcement was sent out:

From: The IESG <iesg-secretary@ietf.org>
To ...
2010-11-16
07 Adrian Farrel Last Call was requested
2010-11-16
07 (System) Ballot writeup text was added
2010-11-16
07 (System) Last call text was added
2010-11-16
07 (System) Ballot approval text was added
2010-11-16
07 Adrian Farrel State changed to Last Call Requested from AD Evaluation::AD Followup.
2010-11-16
07 Adrian Farrel Ballot writeup text changed
2010-11-16
07 Adrian Farrel Last Call text changed
2010-11-15
07 (System) Sub state has been changed to AD Follow up from New Id Needed
2010-11-15
05 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-mpls-ip-options-05.txt
2010-10-29
07 Adrian Farrel State changed to AD Evaluation::Revised ID Needed from AD Evaluation by Adrian Farrel
2010-10-29
07 Adrian Farrel
AD Review

I have performed an AD review of your draft.

Don't panic!

I review all drafts that I am responsible for before putting ...
2010-10-29
07 Adrian Farrel State changed to AD Evaluation from Publication Requested by Adrian Farrel
2010-10-29
07 Cindy Morgan
(1.a)  Who is the Document Shepherd for this document?  Has the
        Document Shepherd personally reviewed this version of ...
2010-10-29
07 Cindy Morgan Draft Added by Cindy Morgan in state Publication Requested
2010-10-29
07 Cindy Morgan [Note]: 'George Swallow (swallow@cisco.com) is the Document Shepherd.' added by Cindy Morgan
2010-05-21
04 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-mpls-ip-options-04.txt
2010-01-06
03 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-mpls-ip-options-03.txt
2010-01-03
07 (System) Document has expired
2009-07-03
02 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-mpls-ip-options-02.txt
2008-12-11
01 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-mpls-ip-options-01.txt
2008-12-10
00 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-mpls-ip-options-00.txt