Security Considerations for the SHA-0 and SHA-1 Message-Digest Algorithms
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 05 and is now closed.
(Russ Housley) Yes
(Peter Saint-Andre) Yes
(Jari Arkko) No Objection
(Ron Bonica) No Objection
(Stewart Bryant) No Objection
(Gonzalo Camarillo) No Objection
(Adrian Farrel) (was Discuss) No Objection
The first paragraph of Section 1 mentions the SHA-1 and SHA-2 family. It then goes on to say that SHA-0 and SHA-1 are message digest algorithms, but there is no further mention of SHA-2. I find that to be a bit of a tease. --- "HMAC" is used unexpanded.
(Alexey Melnikov) No Objection
(Dan Romascanu) No Objection
Comment (2011-02-03 for -)
I support Adrian's DISCUSS. Reading the recommendations section and the supporting justification I rather have the feeling that the recommendations need to be 2119 capitalized and the document should be either standards track or BCP.