Security Considerations for the SHA-0 and SHA-1 Message-Digest Algorithms
RFC 6194
Yes
No Objection
Recuse
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 05 and is now closed.
(Peter Saint-Andre; former steering group member) Yes
(Russ Housley; former steering group member) Yes
(Adrian Farrel; former steering group member) (was Discuss) No Objection
The first paragraph of Section 1 mentions the SHA-1 and SHA-2 family.
It then goes on to say that SHA-0 and SHA-1 are message digest
algorithms, but there is no further mention of SHA-2. I find that to be
a bit of a tease.
---
"HMAC" is used unexpanded.
(Alexey Melnikov; former steering group member) No Objection
(Dan Romascanu; former steering group member) No Objection
I support Adrian's DISCUSS. Reading the recommendations section and the supporting justification I rather have the feeling that the recommendations need to be 2119 capitalized and the document should be either standards track or BCP.
(Gonzalo Camarillo; former steering group member) No Objection
(Jari Arkko; former steering group member) No Objection
(Robert Sparks; former steering group member) No Objection
(Ron Bonica; former steering group member) No Objection
(Stewart Bryant; former steering group member) No Objection
(Sean Turner; former steering group member) Recuse
(Tim Polk; former steering group member) Recuse