Security Considerations for the SHA-0 and SHA-1 Message-Digest Algorithms
RFC 6194

Note: This ballot was opened for revision 05 and is now closed.

(Russ Housley) Yes

(Peter Saint-Andre) Yes

(Jari Arkko) No Objection

(Ron Bonica) No Objection

(Stewart Bryant) No Objection

(Gonzalo Camarillo) No Objection

(Adrian Farrel) (was Discuss) No Objection

Comment (2011-02-02)
No email
send info
The first paragraph of Section 1 mentions the SHA-1 and SHA-2 family.
It then goes on to say that SHA-0 and SHA-1 are message digest
algorithms, but there is no further mention of SHA-2. I find that to be 
a bit of a tease.

"HMAC" is used unexpanded.

(Alexey Melnikov) No Objection

(Dan Romascanu) No Objection

Comment (2011-02-03 for -)
No email
send info
I support Adrian's DISCUSS. Reading the recommendations section and the supporting justification I rather have the feeling that the recommendations need to be 2119 capitalized and the document should be either standards track or BCP. 

(Robert Sparks) No Objection

(Tim Polk) Recuse

(Sean Turner) Recuse