Guidelines for Choosing RTP Control Protocol (RTCP) Canonical Names (CNAMEs)
RFC 6222

Revision differences

Document history

Date Rev. By Action
2015-10-14
05 (System) Notify list changed from avt-chairs@ietf.org, draft-ietf-avt-rtp-cnames@ietf.org to (None)
2012-08-22
05 (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Sean Turner
2012-08-22
05 (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Stewart Bryant
2012-08-22
05 (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Peter Saint-Andre
2012-08-22
05 (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for David Harrington
2012-08-22
05 (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Russ Housley
2011-04-15
05 Cindy Morgan State changed to RFC Published from RFC Ed Queue.
2011-04-15
05 Cindy Morgan [Note]: changed to 'RFC 6222'
2011-04-14
05 (System) RFC published
2011-01-26
05 Amy Vezza State changed to RFC Ed Queue from Approved-announcement sent.
2011-01-26
05 (System) IANA Action state changed to No IC from In Progress
2011-01-26
05 (System) IANA Action state changed to In Progress
2011-01-26
05 Cindy Morgan IESG state changed to Approved-announcement sent
2011-01-26
05 Cindy Morgan IESG has approved the document
2011-01-26
05 Cindy Morgan Closed "Approve" ballot
2011-01-26
05 Cindy Morgan Approval announcement text regenerated
2011-01-26
05 Russ Housley
[Ballot discuss]
The Gen-ART Review by Suresh Krishnan on 2-Jan-2011 raised an issue
  that needs to be resolved before publication. Section 5, Step 2, …
2011-01-26
05 Russ Housley [Ballot Position Update] Position for Russ Housley has been changed to No Objection from Discuss
2011-01-26
05 Stewart Bryant [Ballot Position Update] Position for Stewart Bryant has been changed to No Objection from Discuss
2011-01-25
05 Sean Turner [Ballot Position Update] Position for Sean Turner has been changed to No Objection from Discuss
2011-01-25
05 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-avt-rtp-cnames-05.txt
2011-01-24
05 Peter Saint-Andre [Ballot Position Update] Position for Peter Saint-Andre has been changed to No Objection from Discuss
2011-01-22
05 Sean Turner
[Ballot discuss]
This is an updated discuss based on the -04 version.

#1) (this might be nit picking) If you not looking for anything out …
2011-01-10
05 (System) Sub state has been changed to AD Follow up from New Id Needed
2011-01-10
04 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-avt-rtp-cnames-04.txt
2011-01-07
05 (System) Removed from agenda for telechat - 2011-01-06
2011-01-06
05 Cindy Morgan State changed to IESG Evaluation::Revised ID Needed from IESG Evaluation.
2011-01-06
05 Jari Arkko [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Jari Arkko
2011-01-06
05 Tim Polk [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded
2011-01-06
05 Tim Polk
[Ballot comment]
I support Sean's discuss: hard-coding SHA-1 is unnecessary and counterproductive.  There is no reason that all
clients need to use the same secure …
2011-01-06
05 Ralph Droms [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded
2011-01-06
05 Sean Turner
[Ballot discuss]
#2 was revised based on some side discussions.

#1) Section 5: On the use of SHA-1:  What properties are you looking from the …
2011-01-05
05 Peter Saint-Andre
[Ballot discuss]
This is a fine document with the laudable goal of improving interoperability, but in one respect I think it is both overly specific …
2011-01-05
05 Peter Saint-Andre [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded
2011-01-05
05 Sean Turner
[Ballot comment]
Section 4: Need to add "NOT RECOMMENDED" to Section 2.  It's used as a key word and the 2119 errata allow it, but …
2011-01-05
05 Sean Turner
[Ballot discuss]
Section 5: On the use of SHA-1:  What properties are you looking from the output?  If you require no collisions then SHA-1 is …
2011-01-05
05 Sean Turner
[Ballot discuss]
Section 4: Need to add "NOT RECOMMENDED" to Section 2.  It's used as a key word and the 2119 errata allow it, but …
2011-01-05
05 Adrian Farrel
[Ballot comment]
Support Stewart's Discuss since we have observed "clone" equipment with identical MAC addresses in the past. Also, I believe that some h/w exists …
2011-01-05
05 Adrian Farrel [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded
2011-01-05
05 Russ Housley
[Ballot discuss]
The Gen-ART Review by Suresh Krishnan on 2-Jan-2011 raised an issue
  that needs to be resolved before publication. Section 5, Step 2, …
2011-01-05
05 Russ Housley [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded
2011-01-05
05 Sean Turner [Ballot comment]
Any chance for an example per-session unique identifier?
2011-01-05
05 Sean Turner
[Ballot discuss]
Section 4: Need to add "NOT RECOMMENDED" to Section 2.  It's used as a key word and the 2119 errata allow it, but …
2011-01-05
05 Sean Turner [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded
2011-01-05
05 Stewart Bryant
[Ballot discuss]
I think it would be helpful to the reader to briefly note that whilst the methods described in this document are good enough …
2011-01-05
05 Stewart Bryant [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded
2011-01-04
05 Dan Romascanu
[Ballot comment]
1.
>    After obtaining a identifier by doing (a) or (b),
      the least significant 48 bits are converted to …
2011-01-04
05 Dan Romascanu [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded
2011-01-03
05 David Harrington [Ballot Position Update] Position for David Harrington has been changed to No Objection from Discuss
2011-01-03
05 David Harrington [Ballot discuss]
Please address the concerns raised in the TSVDIR review of this document (12/14/10 1:41 on the IETF Discussion list)
2011-01-03
05 David Harrington [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded
2011-01-03
05 David Harrington
TSV DIR Review

TSV-DIR Last Call review of "Guidelines for Chosing RTP Control Protocol
(RTCP) Canonical Names (CNAMEs)

I've reviewed this document as part of …
2011-01-03
05 Ron Bonica [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded
2010-12-31
05 Gonzalo Camarillo [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded
2010-12-25
05 Alexey Melnikov
[Ballot comment]
5.  Procedure to Generate a Unique Identifier

  2.  Obtain an EUI-64 identifier from the system running this

I think this needs an …
2010-12-25
05 Alexey Melnikov [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded
2010-12-22
05 Robert Sparks State changed to IESG Evaluation from Waiting for AD Go-Ahead::AD Followup.
2010-12-22
05 Robert Sparks [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Robert Sparks
2010-12-22
05 Robert Sparks Ballot has been issued
2010-12-22
05 Robert Sparks Created "Approve" ballot
2010-12-22
05 (System) Sub state has been changed to AD Follow up from New Id Needed
2010-12-22
03 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-avt-rtp-cnames-03.txt
2010-12-22
05 Robert Sparks State changed to Waiting for AD Go-Ahead::Revised ID Needed from Waiting for AD Go-Ahead.
2010-12-16
05 Samuel Weiler Request for Last Call review by SECDIR Completed. Reviewer: Tobias Gondrom.
2010-12-14
05 David Harrington Request for Early review by TSVDIR Completed. Reviewer: Allison Mankin.
2010-12-14
05 (System) State changed to Waiting for AD Go-Ahead from In Last Call.
2010-12-08
05 David Harrington Request for Early review by TSVDIR is assigned to Allison Mankin
2010-12-08
05 David Harrington Request for Early review by TSVDIR is assigned to Allison Mankin
2010-12-08
05 Robert Sparks Placed on agenda for telechat - 2011-01-06
2010-11-30
05 Samuel Weiler Request for Last Call review by SECDIR is assigned to Tobias Gondrom
2010-11-30
05 Samuel Weiler Request for Last Call review by SECDIR is assigned to Tobias Gondrom
2010-11-29
05 Amanda Baber We understand that this document does not require any IANA actions.
2010-11-23
05 Amy Vezza Last call sent
2010-11-23
05 Amy Vezza
State changed to In Last Call from Last Call Requested.

The following Last Call Announcement was sent out:

From: The IESG <iesg-secretary@ietf.org>
To: IETF-Announce <ietf-announce@ietf.org> …
2010-11-23
05 Robert Sparks Last Call was requested
2010-11-23
05 Robert Sparks State changed to Last Call Requested from Publication Requested.
2010-11-23
05 Robert Sparks Last Call text changed
2010-11-23
05 (System) Ballot writeup text was added
2010-11-23
05 (System) Last call text was added
2010-11-23
05 (System) Ballot approval text was added
2010-11-23
05 Robert Sparks Ballot writeup text changed
2010-11-11
05 Cindy Morgan [Note]: 'Keith Drage (keith.drage@alcatel-lucent.com) is the document shepherd.' added by Cindy Morgan
2010-11-11
05 Cindy Morgan
Shepherd writeup for draft-ietf-avt-rtp-cnames-02 " Guidelines for
Choosing RTP Control Protocol (RTCP) Canonical Names (CNAMEs)" as
proposed standard.

  (1.a) Who is the Document Shepherd …
2010-11-11
05 Cindy Morgan Draft Added by Cindy Morgan in state Publication Requested
2010-11-11
02 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-avt-rtp-cnames-02.txt
2010-08-26
01 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-avt-rtp-cnames-01.txt
2010-06-17
00 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-avt-rtp-cnames-00.txt