Skip to main content

Purge Originator Identification TLV for IS-IS
RFC 6232

Yes

(Adrian Farrel)
(Ron Bonica)
(Stewart Bryant)

No Objection

Lars Eggert
(Alexey Melnikov)
(Gonzalo Camarillo)
(Peter Saint-Andre)
(Robert Sparks)
(Russ Housley)

Note: This ballot was opened for revision 05 and is now closed.

Lars Eggert
No Objection
Adrian Farrel Former IESG member
Yes
Yes ()

                            
Ron Bonica Former IESG member
Yes
Yes ()

                            
Stewart Bryant Former IESG member
Yes
Yes ()

                            
Alexey Melnikov Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection ()

                            
Dan Romascanu Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection (2011-02-14)
>   This document requests that IANA assign code point 13 for the 'Purge
   Originator Identification' TLV from the IS-IS 'TLV Codepoints
   Registry'.  The additional values for this TLV should be: IIH:n,
   LSP:y, SNP:n, Purge:y.



I assume that this is OK with this document but usually an Internet-Draft cannot / should not make a request for a specific value, but just require a code point value and recommend that this value be 13. 
Gonzalo Camarillo Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection ()

                            
Jari Arkko Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection (2011-02-17)
Some comments from Ari Keränen who helped me in some of my reviews today:

Abstract

This document updates 3 RFCs, should say that in the abstract. Also LSP acronym should be expanded.
Peter Saint-Andre Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection ()

                            
Ralph Droms Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection (2011-02-16)
Balloting no objection assuming there is an easy answer to my question
(posted to draft-ietf-isis-reg-purge-00) about the IANA ISIS-TLV
registry and notifying ISO JTC1.
Robert Sparks Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection ()

                            
Russ Housley Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection ()

                            
Sean Turner Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection (2011-02-16)
Please add a pointer for where I can find the definition of system ID.
Tim Polk Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection (2011-02-16)
In the Intro, this document states:

   Field experience has observed several circumstances where an IS can
   improperly generate a purge.  These are all due to implementation
   deficiencies or implementations that predate [ISO TC1] and generate a
   purge when they receive a corrupted LSP.

In the security considerations, it is noted that:

   Therefore, all implementations in a domain implementing
   authentication MUST be upgraded to receive the POI TLV before any IS
   is allowed to generate a purge with the POI TLV.

Since you need to touch every ISIS implementation in the domain anyway, is it worth stating that
implementations SHOULD be updated for consistency with [ISO TC1] (i.e., and not generate a purge
when they receive a corrupted LSP) at the same time?