IS-IS Registry Extension for Purges
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 01 and is now closed.
(Ron Bonica) Yes
(Stewart Bryant) Yes
(Adrian Farrel) Yes
(Jari Arkko) No Objection
Comment (2011-02-17 for -)
Some comments from Ari Keränen who helped me in some of my reviews: This document updates 3 RFCs, should say that in the abstract. Also LSP acronym should be expanded.
(Gonzalo Camarillo) No Objection
(Ralph Droms) (was Discuss) No Objection
I cleared my DISCUSS.
(Lars Eggert) No Objection
Comment (2011-02-15 for -)
Agree with Dan that this document should be on a telechat AFTER it passes IETF last call (unless this is urgent in some way?) Section 4., paragraph 1: > This document requests that IANA modify the IS-IS 'TLV Codepoints > Registry' by adding a column in the registry for 'Purge'. A 'y' in > this column indicates that the TLV for this row MAY be found in a > purge. A 'n' in this column indicates that the TLV for this row MUST > NOT be found in a purge. It would be slightly more self-explanatory if the registry column was titled "Allowed in Purge".
(Russ Housley) No Objection
Alexey Melnikov No Objection
(Tim Polk) (was Discuss) No Objection
(Dan Romascanu) No Objection
Comment (2011-02-14 for -)
I have no objection with approving the document as it stands right now but I observe that there is an IETF Last Call running for it and lasting six days after the IESG telechat date. I suggest that any approval be conditional, and in case substantial comments are submitted as Last Call comments after the IESG telechat they are brought to the attention of the IESG.