RFC 4148 and the IP Performance Metrics (IPPM) Registry of Metrics Are Obsolete
RFC 6248

Note: This ballot was opened for revision 03 and is now closed.

(Ron Bonica) Yes

Lars Eggert Yes

(Adrian Farrel) Yes

(Robert Sparks) Yes

Comment (2011-01-31)
No email
send info
This Informational document is Obsoleting a BCP (4148 is also BCP 108). Given 4148's content, I agree with the choice of this document's intended status. 

(Jari Arkko) No Objection

(Stewart Bryant) No Objection

Comment (2011-02-01)
No email
send info
Please add a reference to Zombie_apocalypse, for example  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zombie_apocalypse

(Gonzalo Camarillo) No Objection

(Russ Housley) No Objection

(Alexey Melnikov) No Objection

(Tim Polk) No Objection

Comment (2011-01-30)
No email
send info
I would like to see the security considerations expanded to explain the environments where the risk of a zombie
apocalypse is considered most likely, and any suggested mitigations.

(Dan Romascanu) No Objection

Comment (2011-02-03)
No email
send info
1. It would be useful to introduce a terminology section that would explain terms like 'zombie' and 'apocalypse' used in the Security Considerations section. 

2. In the IANA Considerations section: 

>  The registry will no longer be updated, and the current contents will
   be maintained as-is on the day that RFC XXXX was published.

As this is text to be appended to the Description of the registry on the IANA Web site, it would be useful I think to specify explicitly the date of publication of the RFC - which is also the date of definitive freeze of the registry. 

(Sean Turner) No Objection

Comment (2011-01-30)
No email
send info
While the security considerations made me laugh out loud (thanks for that), I think it should probably be amended to strike the parenthetical.