Encrypted Signaling Transport Modes for the Host Identity Protocol
RFC 6261

Revision differences

Document history

Date Rev. By Action
2015-10-14
06 (System) Notify list changed from hip-chairs@ietf.org, draft-ietf-hip-over-hip@ietf.org to (None)
2012-08-22
06 (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Sean Turner
2012-08-22
06 (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Peter Saint-Andre
2012-08-22
06 (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Lars Eggert
2011-05-26
06 Cindy Morgan State changed to RFC Published from RFC Ed Queue.
2011-05-26
06 (System) RFC published
2011-04-05
06 (System) IANA Action state changed to RFC-Ed-Ack from Waiting on RFC Editor
2011-04-05
06 (System) IANA Action state changed to Waiting on RFC Editor from Waiting on Authors
2011-03-29
06 (System) IANA Action state changed to Waiting on Authors from Waiting on RFC Editor
2011-03-29
06 (System) IANA Action state changed to Waiting on RFC Editor from In Progress
2011-03-29
06 (System) IANA Action state changed to In Progress
2011-03-28
06 Cindy Morgan State changed to RFC Ed Queue from Approved-announcement sent.
2011-03-28
06 Amy Vezza IESG state changed to Approved-announcement sent
2011-03-28
06 Amy Vezza IESG has approved the document
2011-03-28
06 Amy Vezza Closed "Approve" ballot
2011-03-28
06 Amy Vezza Approval announcement text regenerated
2011-03-28
06 Amy Vezza Ballot writeup text changed
2011-03-28
06 Amy Vezza State changed to Approved-announcement to be sent from IESG Evaluation::AD Followup.
2011-03-10
06 Jari Arkko [Ballot Position Update] Position for Jari Arkko has been changed to Yes from Discuss
2011-03-10
06 Peter Saint-Andre [Ballot Position Update] Position for Peter Saint-Andre has been changed to No Objection from Discuss
2011-03-10
06 Lars Eggert [Ballot Position Update] Position for Lars Eggert has been changed to No Objection from Discuss
2011-03-10
06 (System) Sub state has been changed to AD Follow up from New Id Needed
2011-03-10
06 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-hip-over-hip-06.txt
2011-03-03
06 Cindy Morgan Removed from agenda for telechat
2011-03-03
06 Cindy Morgan State changed to IESG Evaluation::Revised ID Needed from IESG Evaluation.
2011-03-03
06 Russ Housley [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded
2011-03-03
06 Jari Arkko
[Ballot comment]
The document should state that hiding HIP control packets inside ESP will make it impossible to build NATs or other middleboxes that look …
2011-03-03
06 Jari Arkko
[Ballot discuss]
I think it would be useful for the document to talk about what happens when there's a NAT, and what the interaction with …
2011-03-03
06 Jari Arkko [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded
2011-03-03
06 Sean Turner [Ballot Position Update] Position for Sean Turner has been changed to No Objection from Discuss
2011-03-02
06 Robert Sparks [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded
2011-03-02
06 Sean Turner
[Ballot comment]
1) It would have helped me had the packet figures from RFC 5201 were added here (assume I'm getting it right):

The HIP …
2011-03-02
06 Sean Turner
[Ballot discuss]
This is similar to Peter's:  Does the HIP base exchange protect against down grade attacks?  I think it does, but wanted to verify.  …
2011-03-02
06 Sean Turner [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded
2011-03-02
06 Stewart Bryant [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded
2011-03-02
06 Dan Romascanu
[Ballot comment]
The OPS-DIR review performed by David Black pointed to the following problem:

The draft is somewhat inconsistent about support for a HIP node …
2011-03-02
06 Dan Romascanu
[Ballot comment]
The OPS-DIR review performed by David Black pointed to the following problem:

The draft is somewhat inconsistent about support for a HIP node …
2011-03-02
06 Dan Romascanu [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded
2011-03-02
06 Adrian Farrel
[Ballot comment]
I was surprised to see no discussion of TCP-AO.

---

I agree with the Discuss about downgrade attacks. These seem to be particularly …
2011-03-02
06 Adrian Farrel [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded
2011-03-01
06 Peter Saint-Andre
[Ballot discuss]
Given that bootstrapping of secure communication depends on transmission of the HIP_TRANSPORT_MODE parameter during HIP base exchange, I'm surprised that the security considerations …
2011-03-01
06 Peter Saint-Andre [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded
2011-03-01
06 Amanda Baber
IANA has a question about the IANA Actions in this document.

IANA understands that, upon approval of this document, there are three
IANA Actions which …
2011-03-01
06 Ralph Droms State changed to IESG Evaluation from Waiting for AD Go-Ahead.
2011-03-01
06 Lars Eggert
[Ballot comment]
INTRODUCTION, paragraph 2:
>        Host Identity Protocol Signaling Message Transport Modes

  I think this title sets a record for …
2011-03-01
06 Lars Eggert
[Ballot discuss]
Section 4.2., paragraph 1:
>    If the ESP-TCP mode is selected, the host with the larger HIT
>    (calculated as defined …
2011-03-01
06 Lars Eggert [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded
2011-03-01
06 (System) State changed to Waiting for AD Go-Ahead from In Last Call.
2011-02-24
06 David Harrington Request for Last Call review by TSVDIR is assigned to Scott Bradner
2011-02-24
06 David Harrington Request for Last Call review by TSVDIR is assigned to Scott Bradner
2011-02-17
06 Gonzalo Camarillo [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded
2011-02-16
06 Samuel Weiler Request for Last Call review by SECDIR is assigned to Alan DeKok
2011-02-16
06 Samuel Weiler Request for Last Call review by SECDIR is assigned to Alan DeKok
2011-02-15
06 Amy Vezza Last call sent
2011-02-15
06 Amy Vezza
State changed to In Last Call from Last Call Requested.

The following Last Call Announcement was sent out:

From: The IESG <iesg-secretary@ietf.org>
To: IETF-Announce <ietf-announce@ietf.org> …
2011-02-15
06 Ralph Droms Placed on agenda for telechat - 2011-03-03
2011-02-15
06 Ralph Droms Status Date has been changed to 2011-02-15 from None
2011-02-15
06 Ralph Droms Last Call was requested
2011-02-15
06 Ralph Droms State changed to Last Call Requested from AD Evaluation.
2011-02-15
06 Ralph Droms Last Call text changed
2011-02-14
06 Ralph Droms [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Ralph Droms
2011-02-14
06 Ralph Droms Ballot has been issued
2011-02-14
06 Ralph Droms Created "Approve" ballot
2011-02-14
06 (System) Ballot writeup text was added
2011-02-14
06 (System) Last call text was added
2011-02-14
06 (System) Ballot approval text was added
2011-02-14
06 Ralph Droms Ballot writeup text changed
2011-01-24
06 Ralph Droms State changed to AD Evaluation from Publication Requested.
2011-01-21
06 Cindy Morgan
(1.a) Who is the Document Shepherd for this document? Has the
Document Shepherd personally reviewed this version of the
document and, in particular, does he …
2011-01-21
06 Cindy Morgan Draft added in state Publication Requested
2011-01-21
06 Cindy Morgan [Note]: 'Gonzalo Camarillo (gonzalo.camarillo@ericsson.com) is the document shepherd' added
2011-01-18
05 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-hip-over-hip-05.txt
2010-12-16
04 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-hip-over-hip-04.txt
2010-10-25
03 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-hip-over-hip-03.txt
2010-10-18
02 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-hip-over-hip-02.txt
2010-07-12
01 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-hip-over-hip-01.txt
2010-04-14
00 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-hip-over-hip-00.txt