Skip to main content

Additional New ASN.1 Modules for the Cryptographic Message Syntax (CMS) and the Public Key Infrastructure Using X.509 (PKIX)
RFC 6268

Yes

(Tim Polk)

No Objection

(Gonzalo Camarillo)
(Jari Arkko)
(Ralph Droms)
(Ron Bonica)
(Stewart Bryant)

Recuse

(Sean Turner)

Note: This ballot was opened for revision 08 and is now closed.

Lars Eggert No Objection

Comment (2011-02-03)
IMO, this should be PS *and* formally "Update" these other RFCs. See Stuart's discuss.

Section 6., paragraph 13:
>     --  Define each of the MAC-ALGOIRTHM objects to describe the

  Nit: s/MAC-ALGOIRTHM/MAC-ALGORITHM/


Section 2., paragraph 1:
>    Protocol designers can make use of the '08 ASN.1 contraints to define

  Nit: s/contraints/constraints/

(Tim Polk; former steering group member) Yes

Yes ()

                            

(Adrian Farrel; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection (2011-02-02)
I support Stewart's Discuss.
Although the resultant long list of "updates" may be a nuisance to some, it is important for the person who plans to update one of the other RFCs to know that this update exists.

---

I am a bit confused why the document talks about RFCs using the old (1988) syntax, but only describes the updates from 2002 to 2008.

(Alexey Melnikov; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection (2011-02-01)
I support Stewart's DISCUSS in regards to updating other RFCs, in particular RFC 5911, which defined earlier versions of new style ASN.1 modules.

I don't have much opinion regarding Informational versa PS, but I think PS would have been just fine.

Which tool was used to verify the new ASN.1?

(Dan Romascanu; former steering group member) (was Discuss) No Objection

No Objection (2011-02-03)
1. I support Stewart's DISCUSS

2. I think that the title of the document is too general and should be more specific - e.g. 'Additional New ASN.1 Modules Using the Cryptographic Message Syntax (CMS) format.

(Gonzalo Camarillo; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ()

                            

(Jari Arkko; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ()

                            

(Ralph Droms; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ()

                            

(Robert Sparks; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection (2011-01-31)
For Stuart and Alexey: I raised very similar questions during the processing of 
<https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-smime-new-asn1/history/>. This document is
following the same pattern that document did. 

(Ron Bonica; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ()

                            

(Russ Housley; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection (2011-02-02)
  Please consider the comments from the Gen-ART Review by Kathleen
  Moriarty on 5-JAN-2011.  You can found the review at:
  
    http://www.softarmor.com/rai/temp-gen-art/
    draft-turner-additional-new-asn-06-moriarty.txt

(Stewart Bryant; former steering group member) (was Discuss) No Objection

No Objection ()

                            

(Sean Turner; former steering group member) Recuse

Recuse ()