Additional New ASN.1 Modules for the Cryptographic Message Syntax (CMS) and the Public Key Infrastructure Using X.509 (PKIX)
RFC 6268

Note: This ballot was opened for revision 08 and is now closed.

Lars Eggert No Objection

IMO, this should be PS *and* formally "Update" these other RFCs. See Stuart's discuss.

Section 6., paragraph 13:
>     --  Define each of the MAC-ALGOIRTHM objects to describe the

  Nit: s/MAC-ALGOIRTHM/MAC-ALGORITHM/


Section 2., paragraph 1:
>    Protocol designers can make use of the '08 ASN.1 contraints to define

  Nit: s/contraints/constraints/

(Tim Polk; former steering group member) Yes

(Adrian Farrel; former steering group member) No Objection

I support Stewart's Discuss.
Although the resultant long list of "updates" may be a nuisance to some, it is important for the person who plans to update one of the other RFCs to know that this update exists.

---

I am a bit confused why the document talks about RFCs using the old (1988) syntax, but only describes the updates from 2002 to 2008.

(Alexey Melnikov; former steering group member) No Objection

I support Stewart's DISCUSS in regards to updating other RFCs, in particular RFC 5911, which defined earlier versions of new style ASN.1 modules.

I don't have much opinion regarding Informational versa PS, but I think PS would have been just fine.

Which tool was used to verify the new ASN.1?

(Dan Romascanu; former steering group member) (was Discuss) No Objection

1. I support Stewart's DISCUSS

2. I think that the title of the document is too general and should be more specific - e.g. 'Additional New ASN.1 Modules Using the Cryptographic Message Syntax (CMS) format.

(Gonzalo Camarillo; former steering group member) No Objection

(Jari Arkko; former steering group member) No Objection

(Ralph Droms; former steering group member) No Objection

(Robert Sparks; former steering group member) No Objection

For Stuart and Alexey: I raised very similar questions during the processing of 
<https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-smime-new-asn1/history/>. This document is
following the same pattern that document did. 

(Ron Bonica; former steering group member) No Objection

(Russ Housley; former steering group member) No Objection

  Please consider the comments from the Gen-ART Review by Kathleen
  Moriarty on 5-JAN-2011.  You can found the review at:
  
    http://www.softarmor.com/rai/temp-gen-art/
    draft-turner-additional-new-asn-06-moriarty.txt

(Stewart Bryant; former steering group member) (was Discuss) No Objection

(Sean Turner; former steering group member) Recuse