Requirements for SIP-Based Session Peering
RFC 6271

Revision differences

Document history

Date Rev. By Action
2015-10-14
11 (System) Notify list changed from speermint-chairs@ietf.org, draft-ietf-speermint-requirements@ietf.org to (None)
2012-08-22
11 (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Robert Sparks
2012-08-22
11 (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Dan Romascanu
2011-06-29
11 Cindy Morgan State changed to RFC Published from RFC Ed Queue.
2011-06-28
11 (System) RFC published
2011-03-15
11 (System) IANA Action state changed to No IC from In Progress
2011-03-15
11 (System) IANA Action state changed to In Progress
2011-03-15
11 Cindy Morgan State changed to RFC Ed Queue from Approved-announcement sent.
2011-03-15
11 Amy Vezza IESG state changed to Approved-announcement sent
2011-03-15
11 Amy Vezza IESG has approved the document
2011-03-15
11 Amy Vezza Closed "Approve" ballot
2011-03-15
11 Amy Vezza Approval announcement text regenerated
2011-03-15
11 Amy Vezza Ballot writeup text changed
2011-03-15
11 Gonzalo Camarillo [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded
2011-03-11
11 (System) Sub state has been changed to AD Follow up from New Id Needed
2011-03-11
11 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-speermint-requirements-11.txt
2011-02-24
11 Gonzalo Camarillo State changed to IESG Evaluation::Revised ID Needed from IESG Evaluation::AD Followup.
2010-12-01
11 Robert Sparks
[Ballot discuss]
The question "Is DNS the right place for putting data that varies based
on who asks?" is out of place in this document ...
2010-12-01
11 Robert Sparks [Ballot Position Update] Position for Robert Sparks has been changed to No Objection from Discuss
2010-10-25
11 (System) Sub state has been changed to AD Follow up from New Id Needed
2010-10-25
10 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-speermint-requirements-10.txt
2010-04-23
11 Gonzalo Camarillo State Changes to IESG Evaluation::Revised ID Needed from IESG Evaluation::AD Followup by Gonzalo Camarillo
2010-04-23
11 Gonzalo Camarillo Waiting for the author to address the discuss and comments received.
2010-04-23
11 Gonzalo Camarillo Note field has been cleared by Gonzalo Camarillo
2010-04-15
11 Amy Vezza Responsible AD has been changed to Gonzalo Camarillo from Cullen Jennings
2009-11-03
11 Dan Romascanu [Ballot Position Update] Position for Dan Romascanu has been changed to No Objection from Discuss by Dan Romascanu
2009-10-27
11 Alexey Melnikov [Ballot Position Update] Position for Alexey Melnikov has been changed to No Objection from Discuss by Alexey Melnikov
2009-10-27
11 Alexey Melnikov
[Ballot comment]
From review of Section 4 by Peter Saint-Andre:

Requirement #13

      It should be possible to send a presence document with ...
2009-10-27
11 Alexey Melnikov [Ballot discuss]
2009-10-26
09 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-speermint-requirements-09.txt
2009-10-26
11 (System) Sub state has been changed to AD Follow up from New Id Needed
2009-10-26
08 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-speermint-requirements-08.txt
2009-10-09
11 (System) Removed from agenda for telechat - 2009-10-08
2009-10-08
11 Cindy Morgan State Changes to IESG Evaluation::Revised ID Needed from IESG Evaluation by Cindy Morgan
2009-10-08
11 Alexey Melnikov
[Ballot comment]
In Section 4:

  o  Requirement #14: Mappings
      Early deployments of SIP based presence and IM gateways are done
  ...
2009-10-08
11 Alexey Melnikov
[Ballot discuss]
1).
draft-ietf-speermint-voip-consolidated-usecases-14.txt shows use of DNS queries for Look-Up Function (LUF) and Location Routing Function (LRF).
Section 5.1 of draft-ietf-speermint-requirements-07.txt ...
2009-10-08
11 Lisa Dusseault [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Lisa Dusseault
2009-10-08
11 Dan Romascanu
[Ballot discuss]
Bernard Aboba's OPS-DIR review raised a number of issues, a couple of them should be addressed before this document is approved:

1 ...
2009-10-08
11 Dan Romascanu [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded by Dan Romascanu
2009-10-08
11 Adrian Farrel [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Adrian Farrel
2009-10-08
11 Adrian Farrel
[Ballot comment]
Thank you for numbering the requirements. This will make life so much easier in future documents.

---

The Introduction is a bit confusing I ...
2009-10-08
11 Ross Callon [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Ross Callon
2009-10-08
11 Tim Polk [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Tim Polk
2009-10-08
11 Ron Bonica [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Ron Bonica
2009-10-07
11 Alexey Melnikov
[Ballot comment]
In Section 4:

  o  Requirement #14: Mappings
      Early deployments of SIP based presence and IM gateways are done
  ...
2009-10-07
11 Alexey Melnikov
[Ballot discuss]
1). DISCUSS DISCUSS, i.e. I intent to clear this part during/after the IESG telechat:

draft-ietf-speermint-voip-consolidated-usecases-14.txt shows use of DNS queries ...
2009-10-07
11 Alexey Melnikov
[Ballot comment]
In Section 4:

  o  Requirement #14: Mappings
      Early deployments of SIP based presence and IM gateways are done
  ...
2009-10-07
11 Alexey Melnikov
[Ballot discuss]
1). DISCUSS DISCUSS, i.e. I intent to clear this part during/after the IESG telechat:

draft-ietf-speermint-voip-consolidated-usecases-14.txt shows use of DNS queries ...
2009-10-07
11 Robert Sparks [Ballot comment]
Nit: typo: "if user consent is not give,": give should be given
2009-10-07
11 Robert Sparks
[Ballot discuss]
The question "Is DNS the right place for putting data that varies based
on who asks?" is out of place in this document ...
2009-10-07
11 Robert Sparks [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded by Robert Sparks
2009-10-07
11 Lars Eggert
[Ballot comment]
WGs are ephemeral - continously refering to the originating SPEERMINT
  WG in the title and body of the document will read strangely in ...
2009-10-07
11 Lars Eggert [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Lars Eggert
2009-10-06
11 Russ Housley [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Russ Housley
2009-10-06
11 Ralph Droms [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Ralph Droms
2009-10-06
11 Ralph Droms
[Ballot comment]
Minor editorial nit.  In section A.1, this sentence doesn't parse:

  o  IP Network Connectivity:
      Session peers ...
2009-10-03
11 Alexey Melnikov
[Ballot comment]
In Section 4:

  o  Requirement #14: Mappings
      Early deployments of SIP based presence and IM gateways are done
  ...
2009-10-03
11 Alexey Melnikov
[Ballot discuss]
This is a DISCUSS DISCUSS, so I intent to clear it during/after the IESG telechat:

draft-ietf-speermint-voip-consolidated-usecases-14.txt shows use of DNS queries ...
2009-10-03
11 Alexey Melnikov [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded by Alexey Melnikov
2009-10-03
11 Alexey Melnikov
[Ballot comment]
In Section 4:

  o  Requirement #14: Mappings
      Early deployments of SIP based presence and IM gateways are done
  ...
2009-10-01
11 Cullen Jennings [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Cullen Jennings
2009-10-01
11 Cullen Jennings Ballot has been issued by Cullen Jennings
2009-10-01
11 Cullen Jennings Created "Approve" ballot
2009-10-01
11 Cullen Jennings State Changes to IESG Evaluation from Waiting for AD Go-Ahead by Cullen Jennings
2009-10-01
11 Cullen Jennings Placed on agenda for telechat - 2009-10-08 by Cullen Jennings
2009-07-08
11 (System) State has been changed to Waiting for AD Go-Ahead from In Last Call by system
2009-07-03
11 Samuel Weiler Request for Last Call review by SECDIR Completed. Reviewer: Catherine Meadows.
2009-06-25
11 Michelle Cotton IANA Last Call comments:

As described in the IANA Considerations section, we understand this document
to have NO IANA Actions.
2009-06-25
11 Samuel Weiler Request for Last Call review by SECDIR is assigned to Catherine Meadows
2009-06-25
11 Samuel Weiler Request for Last Call review by SECDIR is assigned to Catherine Meadows
2009-06-24
11 Cindy Morgan Last call sent
2009-06-24
11 Cindy Morgan State Changes to In Last Call from Last Call Requested by Cindy Morgan
2009-06-24
11 Cullen Jennings Last Call was requested by Cullen Jennings
2009-06-24
11 Cullen Jennings State Changes to Last Call Requested from AD Evaluation by Cullen Jennings
2009-06-24
11 (System) Ballot writeup text was added
2009-06-24
11 (System) Last call text was added
2009-06-24
11 (System) Ballot approval text was added
2009-05-24
11 Cullen Jennings Cullen needs to talk to chairs to understand one use case.
2009-05-24
11 Cullen Jennings State Changes to AD Evaluation from Publication Requested by Cullen Jennings
2009-04-01
11 Cullen Jennings Responsible AD has been changed to Cullen Jennings from Jon Peterson
2008-11-03
11 Cindy Morgan
Draft Name: draft-ietf-speermint-requirements-07
Draft File Location:
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-speermint-requirements-07
.txt
Proposed Status: Informational RFC

================================================================
WG Name: speermint
WG Area: RAI
WG Co-Chairs ...
2008-11-03
11 Cindy Morgan Draft Added by Cindy Morgan in state Publication Requested
2008-10-17
07 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-speermint-requirements-07.txt
2008-07-14
06 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-speermint-requirements-06.txt
2008-06-27
05 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-speermint-requirements-05.txt
2008-02-25
04 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-speermint-requirements-04.txt
2007-11-19
03 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-speermint-requirements-03.txt
2007-07-12
02 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-speermint-requirements-02.txt
2006-10-25
01 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-speermint-requirements-01.txt
2006-06-21
00 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-speermint-requirements-00.txt