An Architecture for Location and Location Privacy in Internet Applications
RFC 6280

Revision differences

Document history

Date Rev. By Action
2015-10-14 03 (System) Notify list changed from geopriv-chairs@ietf.org, draft-ietf-geopriv-arch@ietf.org to (None)
2012-08-22 03 (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Sean Turner
2012-08-22 03 (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the Yes position for Robert Sparks
2012-08-22 03 (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for David Harrington
2011-08-02 03 Cindy Morgan State changed to RFC Published from RFC Ed Queue.
2011-07-23 03 (System) RFC published
2011-03-14 03 Cindy Morgan State changed to RFC Ed Queue from Approved-announcement sent.
2011-03-14 03 (System) IANA Action state changed to No IC from In Progress
2011-03-14 03 (System) IANA Action state changed to In Progress
2011-03-14 03 Cindy Morgan IESG state changed to Approved-announcement sent
2011-03-14 03 Cindy Morgan IESG has approved the document
2011-03-14 03 Cindy Morgan Closed "Approve" ballot
2011-03-14 03 Cindy Morgan Approval announcement text regenerated
2011-03-14 03 Robert Sparks [Ballot Position Update] Position for Robert Sparks has been changed to Yes from Discuss
2011-03-14 03 Robert Sparks Ballot writeup text changed
2011-03-14 03 Robert Sparks Ballot writeup text changed
2011-03-10 03 David Harrington
[Ballot comment]
I agree with others. well written. thanks.
I cleared the DISCUSS.

5) I agree with Tim's comment about MUST attempt to download ...
2011-03-10 03 David Harrington [Ballot Position Update] Position for David Harrington has been changed to No Objection from Discuss
2011-03-10 03 David Harrington
[Ballot discuss]
updated for -03-

1) I still have concerns about the predictability of rule precedence. At a minimum, I think there should be one ...
2010-10-19 03 David Harrington
[Ballot comment]
I agree with others. well written. thanks.

1) the text is often inconsistent between using the spelled out terms (Location Recipient) and abbreviations ...
2010-10-19 03 David Harrington
[Ballot discuss]
updated for -03-

1) I still have concerns about the predictability of rule precedence. At a minimum, I think there should be one ...
2010-10-12 03 Sean Turner [Ballot Position Update] Position for Sean Turner has been changed to No Objection from Discuss by Sean Turner
2010-10-11 03 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-geopriv-arch-03.txt
2010-09-10 03 (System) Removed from agenda for telechat - 2010-09-09
2010-09-09 03 Amy Vezza State changed to IESG Evaluation::AD Followup from IESG Evaluation by Amy Vezza
2010-09-09 03 Gonzalo Camarillo [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Gonzalo Camarillo
2010-09-09 03 Stewart Bryant [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Stewart Bryant
2010-09-09 03 Ralph Droms [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Ralph Droms
2010-09-09 03 Adrian Farrel [Ballot comment]
Thanks for this important work.
2010-09-09 03 Adrian Farrel [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Adrian Farrel
2010-09-09 03 Dan Romascanu
[Ballot comment]
I find the location of the text that refers to usage of 2119 keywords unusual (in a Glossary section) and contrary to the ...
2010-09-09 03 Dan Romascanu [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded by Dan Romascanu
2010-09-09 03 Jari Arkko [Ballot comment]
Good stuff. Thanks for writing this.
2010-09-09 03 Jari Arkko [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded by Jari Arkko
2010-09-08 03 David Harrington
[Ballot comment]
I agree with others. well written. thanks.

1) the text is often inconsistent between using the spelled out terms (Location Recipient) and abbreviations ...
2010-09-08 03 David Harrington
[Ballot discuss]
1) I have concerns about the predictability of 3.2.4 rules. At a minimum, I think there should be standard default behaviors ...
2010-09-08 03 David Harrington [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded by David Harrington
2010-09-08 03 Peter Saint-Andre
[Ballot comment]
This is an excellent document. Herewith several minor comments.

1. In Section 1.1 (last sentence), s/provides/provide/

2. Section 1.3 ...
2010-09-08 03 Peter Saint-Andre [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded by Peter Saint-Andre
2010-09-08 03 Ron Bonica [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Ron Bonica
2010-09-08 03 Lars Eggert [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Lars Eggert
2010-09-08 03 Tim Polk
[Ballot comment]
This is a very well written document.  Much appreciated!

I support's Sean's issues with the need for 2119 language in ...
2010-09-08 03 Tim Polk [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Tim Polk
2010-09-08 03 Sean Turner
[Ballot discuss]
An extremely well written document.    I have two things I'd like to discuss before changing my ballot position:

1) I ...
2010-09-08 03 Sean Turner [Ballot comment]
1) Expand GPS and AGPS on first occurrence.

2) Sec 5.2) r/defines a a/ defines a
2010-09-08 03 Sean Turner
[Ballot discuss]
An extremely well written document.    I have two things I'd like to discuss before approval:

1) I read Sec 3 ...
2010-09-08 03 Sean Turner [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded by Sean Turner
2010-09-08 03 Sean Turner
[Ballot comment]
These are just a draft...

1) I read Sec 3.1.3 as providing security requirements for positioning.  If that's how ...
2010-09-08 03 Sean Turner
[Ballot comment]
These are just a draft...

1) I read Sec 3.1.3 as providing security requirements for positioning.  If that's how ...
2010-09-08 03 Sean Turner
[Ballot comment]
1) I read Sec 3.1.3 as providing security requirements for positioning.  If that's how I'm supposed to read ...
2010-09-07 03 Robert Sparks
[Ballot discuss]
An IPR disclosure was filed referencing this draft on Aug31. See
Additional information has been requested. No action is required from the authors ...
2010-09-07 03 Robert Sparks [Ballot Position Update] Position for Robert Sparks has been changed to Discuss from Yes by Robert Sparks
2010-09-06 03 Russ Housley [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Russ Housley
2010-09-05 03 Alexey Melnikov
[Ballot comment]
I am balloting Yes on this document, because I think it is a good and important document. However there are some issues related ...
2010-09-05 03 Alexey Melnikov [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded by Alexey Melnikov
2010-08-30 03 Samuel Weiler Request for Last Call review by SECDIR Completed. Reviewer: Phillip Hallam-Baker.
2010-08-26 03 Robert Sparks Placed on agenda for telechat - 2010-09-09 by Robert Sparks
2010-08-26 03 Robert Sparks State changed to IESG Evaluation from Waiting for AD Go-Ahead by Robert Sparks
2010-08-26 03 Robert Sparks [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Robert Sparks
2010-08-26 03 Robert Sparks Ballot has been issued by Robert Sparks
2010-08-26 03 Robert Sparks Created "Approve" ballot
2010-07-23 03 (System) State has been changed to Waiting for AD Go-Ahead from In Last Call by system
2010-07-19 03 Amanda Baber IANA comments:

As described in the IANA Considerations section, we understand this
document to have NO IANA Actions.
2010-07-11 03 Samuel Weiler Request for Last Call review by SECDIR is assigned to Phillip Hallam-Baker
2010-07-09 03 Amy Vezza Last call sent
2010-07-09 03 Amy Vezza State Changes to In Last Call from Last Call Requested by Amy Vezza
2010-07-09 03 Robert Sparks State Changes to Last Call Requested from Publication Requested by Robert Sparks
2010-07-09 03 Robert Sparks Last Call was requested by Robert Sparks
2010-07-09 03 (System) Ballot writeup text was added
2010-07-09 03 (System) Last call text was added
2010-07-09 03 (System) Ballot approval text was added
2010-06-21 03 Cindy Morgan State Changes to Publication Requested from AD is watching by Cindy Morgan
2010-06-21 03 Cindy Morgan
(1.a) Who is the Document Shepherd for this document? Has the
Document Shepherd personally reviewed this version of the
document and, in particular, does ...
2010-06-21 03 Cindy Morgan [Note]: 'Alissa Cooper (acooper@cdt.org) is the document shepherd.' added by Cindy Morgan
2010-05-27 02 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-geopriv-arch-02.txt
2010-05-26 03 Robert Sparks Draft Added by Robert Sparks in state AD is watching
2010-05-25 03 Robert Sparks I-D Resurrection was requested by Robert Sparks
2009-10-26 01 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-geopriv-arch-01.txt
2009-07-13 00 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-geopriv-arch-00.txt