Locally Served DNS Zones
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 15 and is now closed.
(Jari Arkko) Yes
(Ron Bonica) Yes
(Stewart Bryant) No Objection
(Ralph Droms) (was Discuss) No Objection
(Wesley Eddy) No Objection
(Adrian Farrel) No Objection
Will it be clear to IANA exactly what they have to do in order to satisfy the following text from Section 6? IANA should co-ordinate with the RIRs to ensure that, as DNSSEC is deployed in the reverse tree, delegations for these zones are made in the manner described in Section 7.
(Stephen Farrell) No Objection
(Russ Housley) No Objection
(Pete Resnick) No Objection
I don't understand why this is not standards track. It might not be likely that implementation experience will change this spec, but it's certainly possible.
(Dan Romascanu) No Objection
(Peter Saint-Andre) No Objection
(Robert Sparks) No Objection
(Sean Turner) No Objection
wordsmithing here: Sec 3: use 2219 language in the following?: OLD: This document recommends that the NS record defaults to the name of the zone and the SOA MNAME defaults to the name of the only NS RR's target. NEW: It is RECOMMENDED that the NS record defaults to the name of the zone and the SOA MNAME defaults to the name of the only NS RR's target.