Locally Served DNS Zones
RFC 6303

Note: This ballot was opened for revision 15 and is now closed.

(Jari Arkko) Yes

(Ron Bonica) Yes

(Stewart Bryant) No Objection

(Ralph Droms) (was Discuss) No Objection

(Wesley Eddy) No Objection

(Adrian Farrel) No Objection

Comment (2011-04-26)
No email
send info
Will it be clear to IANA exactly what they have to do in order to satisfy the following text from Section 6?

   IANA should co-ordinate with the RIRs to ensure that, as DNSSEC is
   deployed in the reverse tree, delegations for these zones are made in
   the manner described in Section 7.

(Stephen Farrell) No Objection

(Russ Housley) No Objection

(Pete Resnick) No Objection

Comment (2011-04-26)
No email
send info
I don't understand why this is not standards track. It might not be likely that implementation experience will change this spec, but it's certainly possible.

(Dan Romascanu) No Objection

(Peter Saint-Andre) No Objection

(Robert Sparks) No Objection

(Sean Turner) No Objection

Comment (2011-04-27)
No email
send info
wordsmithing here:

Sec 3: use 2219 language in the following?:

OLD:

   This document recommends that the NS record
   defaults to the name of the zone and the SOA MNAME defaults to the
   name of the only NS RR's target.

NEW:

   It is RECOMMENDED that the NS record
   defaults to the name of the zone and the SOA MNAME defaults to the
   name of the only NS RR's target.