Encapsulation Methods for Transport of Fibre Channel Traffic over MPLS Networks
RFC 6307
Yes
No Objection
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 16 and is now closed.
(Adrian Farrel; former steering group member) (was Discuss) Yes
Section 3.1 Although you say: The fragmentation bits (bits 8-9) are not used by the FC PW protocol. These bits may be used in the future for FC specific indications as defined in [RFC4385]. It appears from the diagram that you require these bits to be set to zero, and I suspect that a future extension might interpret the bits. I think you should be more explicit in the text. === Nits Section 1 "the TCP protocol" The P in TCP stands for what? :-) --- Section 1.1 s/port on far end of the FC link/port on the far end of the FC link/
(Stewart Bryant; former steering group member) Yes
(Dan Romascanu; former steering group member) (was Discuss) No Objection
(Jari Arkko; former steering group member) (was Discuss) No Objection
(Pete Resnick; former steering group member) No Objection
I don't think this is worthy of a discuss, but is the byte order for FC PW Control Word (and other items) specified? Does it need to be in this document?
(Ralph Droms; former steering group member) No Objection
(Robert Sparks; former steering group member) No Objection
(Ron Bonica; former steering group member) No Objection
(Russ Housley; former steering group member) No Objection
(Sean Turner; former steering group member) No Objection
(Stephen Farrell; former steering group member) (was Discuss) No Objection
NSP is used without expansion.
(Wesley Eddy; former steering group member) No Objection