Pseudowire (PW) Operations, Administration, and Maintenance (OAM) Message Mapping
RFC 6310
Yes
No Objection
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 16 and is now closed.
Lars Eggert No Objection
(Stewart Bryant; former steering group member) Yes
(Adrian Farrel; former steering group member) (was Discuss) No Objection
I have updated my Comment for revision 15. Thank you for addressing the nits I had raised. I have one new Comment that is moved here from a former Discuss... I appreciate the change wrt MS-PW I would prefer OLD While this document is worded in terms of single segment PWs, its content also applies to T-PEs for MS-PWs ([RFC5254]). Section 10 of [RFC6073] details procedures for generating or relaying PW status by an S-PE. NEW This document is scoped only to single segment PWs. The mechanisms described in this document could also be applied to T-PEs for MS-PWs ([RFC5254]). Section 10 of [RFC6073] details procedures for generating or relaying PW status by an S-PE. END
(Dan Romascanu; former steering group member) No Objection
(Gonzalo Camarillo; former steering group member) No Objection
(Jari Arkko; former steering group member) No Objection
(Pete Resnick; former steering group member) No Objection
(Peter Saint-Andre; former steering group member) No Objection
(Ralph Droms; former steering group member) No Objection
(Robert Sparks; former steering group member) No Objection
(Ron Bonica; former steering group member) No Objection
(Russ Housley; former steering group member) No Objection
Appendix B.3: s/Los/Loss/
(Sean Turner; former steering group member) No Objection
(Stephen Farrell; former steering group member) No Objection
(Wesley Eddy; former steering group member) No Objection