Suite B in Secure/Multipurpose Internet Mail Extensions (S/MIME)
RFC 6318
Yes
No Objection
Recuse
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 01 and is now closed.
(Jari Arkko; former steering group member) (was Discuss) Yes
(Sean Turner; former steering group member) Yes
(Adrian Farrel; former steering group member) No Objection
I have no objection to the publication of this document. I note that idnits says: -- The draft header indicates that this document obsoletes RFC5008, but the abstract doesn't seem to mention this, which it should.
(Dan Romascanu; former steering group member) (was Discuss) No Objection
(Gonzalo Camarillo; former steering group member) No Objection
(Pete Resnick; former steering group member) No Objection
(Peter Saint-Andre; former steering group member) No Objection
(Robert Sparks; former steering group member) No Objection
(Ron Bonica; former steering group member) No Objection
(Stephen Farrell; former steering group member) No Objection
(1) The document does say "united states" in a few places, but maybe that'd be better included in the title as well. (2) The KE in "KE sets" doesn't seem to be expanded anywhere.
(Stewart Bryant; former steering group member) No Objection
This document has an IPR disclosure against it, but I did not see that called out in the IETF Last Call notice.
(Wesley Eddy; former steering group member) No Objection
(Russ Housley; former steering group member) Recuse