Datatracker States and Annotations for the IAB, IRTF, and Independent Submission Streams
RFC 6322
Yes
(Pete Resnick)
(Peter Saint-Andre)
(Ralph Droms)
(Russ Housley)
(Wesley Eddy)
No Objection
(Adrian Farrel)
(Dan Romascanu)
(Gonzalo Camarillo)
(Robert Sparks)
(Ron Bonica)
(Stephen Farrell)
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 15 and is now closed.
Jari Arkko Former IESG member
Yes
Yes
(2011-05-26)
Thanks for writing it. I think the document is in good shape and can move forward. I just had two issues that you may wish to consider: The "IESG Review Completed" annotation seems odd to me. Per tracker history you will be able to see that it went through IESG and other review states. For consistency: you do not have ISE Review Completed or IRSG Review Completed annotations either. Finally, all other annotations are about things that should happen with the document, not about things that have happened. > by the stream managers. In addtion, the IETF Data Tracker should addition
Pete Resnick Former IESG member
Yes
Yes
()
Peter Saint-Andre Former IESG member
(was No Objection, Discuss)
Yes
Yes
()
Ralph Droms Former IESG member
Yes
Yes
()
Russ Housley Former IESG member
Yes
Yes
()
Wesley Eddy Former IESG member
Yes
Yes
()
Adrian Farrel Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Dan Romascanu Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Gonzalo Camarillo Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Robert Sparks Former IESG member
(was Discuss)
No Objection
No Objection
(2011-05-26)
Ron Bonica Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Stephen Farrell Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Stewart Bryant Former IESG member
(was Discuss)
No Objection
No Objection
(2011-05-23)
There should be a security note stateing that putting April 1st IDs in the tracker would be damaging to their purpose.