Skip to main content

Mobile Networks Considerations for IPv6 Deployment
RFC 6342

Yes

(Ron Bonica)

No Objection

(Adrian Farrel)
(Dan Romascanu)
(Peter Saint-Andre)
(Robert Sparks)
(Stewart Bryant)

Note: This ballot was opened for revision 05 and is now closed.

Ron Bonica Former IESG member
Yes
Yes ()

                            
Adrian Farrel Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection ()

                            
Dan Romascanu Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection ()

                            
Jari Arkko Former IESG member
(was Discuss) No Objection
No Objection (2011-05-19)
I still disagree with many of the conclusions from Section 4.
Peter Saint-Andre Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection ()

                            
Ralph Droms Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection (2011-03-16)
Seems like any statements like the following predicting the final
allocation of IPv4 addresses are likely to be out-of-date or
inaccurate.  I suggest eliding text like the following from section 3.1:

   The '/8' IANA blocks for Regional Internet
   Registries (RIRs) are projected to 'run-out' soon.  Subsequently, the
   addressing pool available to RIRs for assignment to Internet Service
   Providers is anticipated to run-out in the following 2-3 years.

Robert Sparks Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection ()

                            
Russ Housley Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection (2011-03-15)
  Following the Gen-ART Review by Kathleen Moriarty on 21-Feb-2011,
  several changes were agreed.  However, a revised document has not
  been posted yet.  Please make sure the revisions get included.
Sean Turner Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection (2011-03-17)
The tense of the 1st sentence in the abstract and intro should probably be changed because the pool is now empty.
Stewart Bryant Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection ()