Datagram Transport Layer Security Version 1.2
RFC 6347

Note: This ballot was opened for revision 06 and is now closed.

(Robert Sparks) Yes

(Sean Turner) Yes

Jari Arkko No Objection

(Ron Bonica) No Objection

Comment (2011-01-17 for -)
Suport OPS-DIR DISCUSS

(Stewart Bryant) No Objection

Comment (2011-01-19 for -)
 

(Gonzalo Camarillo) No Objection

(Ralph Droms) No Objection

(Lars Eggert) No Objection

(Adrian Farrel) (was Discuss) No Objection

Comment (2011-01-20)
I support Alexey's Discuss about description of the changes since/to 4347

---

Should the version numbering be recorded by IANA?

---

How is wrapping of epoch and sequence number handled? Or is it considered that they will never need to wrap?

---

It might be valuable to repeat the UDP warning from 4.1.2.7 in section 5

---

Section 4.3

   This section includes specifications for the data structures that
   have changed between TLS 1.2 and DTLS.

I think s/DTLS/DTLS 1.2/

---

(Russ Housley) (was Discuss) No Objection

Alexey Melnikov (was Discuss) No Objection

Comment (2011-01-02)
SCTP, RC4, SCTP-AUTH should have Informative references.

(Tim Polk) No Objection

Comment (2011-01-20 for -)
placeholder for Charlie Kaufman's secdir review - this deserves a response.  I made this a comment since I know that the sponsoring AD intends to seem them addressed.

(Dan Romascanu) (was Discuss) No Objection

(Peter Saint-Andre) No Objection

Comment (2011-01-18 for -)
I support Alexey's DISCUSS regarding the need for a section describing the changes from DTLS 1.0 (RFC 4347).