Datagram Transport Layer Security Version 1.2
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 06 and is now closed.
(Robert Sparks) Yes
(Sean Turner) Yes
(Jari Arkko) No Objection
(Ron Bonica) No Objection
Comment (2011-01-17 for -)
Suport OPS-DIR DISCUSS
(Stewart Bryant) No Objection
Comment (2011-01-19 for -)
(Gonzalo Camarillo) No Objection
(Ralph Droms) No Objection
(Lars Eggert) No Objection
(Adrian Farrel) (was Discuss) No Objection
I support Alexey's Discuss about description of the changes since/to 4347 --- Should the version numbering be recorded by IANA? --- How is wrapping of epoch and sequence number handled? Or is it considered that they will never need to wrap? --- It might be valuable to repeat the UDP warning from 188.8.131.52 in section 5 --- Section 4.3 This section includes specifications for the data structures that have changed between TLS 1.2 and DTLS. I think s/DTLS/DTLS 1.2/ ---
(Russ Housley) (was Discuss) No Objection
Alexey Melnikov (was Discuss) No Objection
SCTP, RC4, SCTP-AUTH should have Informative references.
(Tim Polk) No Objection
Comment (2011-01-20 for -)
placeholder for Charlie Kaufman's secdir review - this deserves a response. I made this a comment since I know that the sponsoring AD intends to seem them addressed.
(Dan Romascanu) (was Discuss) No Objection
(Peter Saint-Andre) No Objection
Comment (2011-01-18 for -)
I support Alexey's DISCUSS regarding the need for a section describing the changes from DTLS 1.0 (RFC 4347).