Framework for TCP Throughput Testing
RFC 6349

Revision differences

Document history

Date Rev. By Action
2015-10-14 13 (System) Notify list changed from ippm-chairs@ietf.org, draft-ietf-ippm-tcp-throughput-tm@ietf.org to (None)
2012-08-22 13 (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Stewart Bryant
2012-08-22 13 (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Ralph Droms
2012-08-22 13 (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Stephen Farrell
2011-08-19 13 Cindy Morgan State changed to RFC Published from RFC Ed Queue.
2011-08-19 13 (System) RFC published
2011-06-23 13 Cindy Morgan State changed to RFC Ed Queue from Approved-announcement sent.
2011-06-22 13 (System) IANA Action state changed to No IC from In Progress
2011-06-22 13 (System) IANA Action state changed to In Progress
2011-06-22 13 Amy Vezza IESG state changed to Approved-announcement sent
2011-06-22 13 Amy Vezza IESG has approved the document
2011-06-22 13 Amy Vezza Closed "Approve" ballot
2011-06-21 13 Wesley Eddy Ballot writeup text changed
2011-06-21 13 Wesley Eddy Approval announcement text regenerated
2011-06-21 13 Wesley Eddy Ballot writeup text changed
2011-06-21 13 Wesley Eddy Ballot writeup text changed
2011-06-16 13 Wesley Eddy State changed to Approved-announcement to be sent from Approved-announcement to be sent::AD Followup.
2011-06-16 13 Wesley Eddy State changed to Approved-announcement to be sent::AD Followup from IESG Evaluation::AD Followup.
2011-06-16 13 Wesley Eddy Approval announcement text changed
2011-06-16 13 Wesley Eddy Approval announcement text changed
2011-06-16 13 Wesley Eddy Approval announcement text regenerated
2011-06-16 13 Stewart Bryant [Ballot Position Update] Position for Stewart Bryant has been changed to No Objection from Discuss
2011-06-16 13 Ralph Droms [Ballot comment]
I've reviewed rev -13.  All of my Discuss and Comment
points have been addressed, and I have cleared my Discuss.
2011-06-16 13 Ralph Droms [Ballot Position Update] Position for Ralph Droms has been changed to No Objection from Discuss
2011-06-15 13 Stephen Farrell
[Ballot discuss]
(1) I don't quite understand how the IPR declaration and the spec match up.
The IPR declaration says you don't need ...
2011-06-15 13 Stephen Farrell [Ballot Position Update] Position for Stephen Farrell has been changed to No Objection from Discuss
2011-05-31 13 (System) Sub state has been changed to AD Follow up from New Id Needed
2011-05-31 13 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-ippm-tcp-throughput-tm-13.txt
2011-05-12 13 Amy Vezza Removed from agenda for telechat
2011-05-12 13 Amy Vezza State changed to IESG Evaluation::Revised ID Needed from IESG Evaluation.
2011-05-12 13 Dan Romascanu
[Ballot comment]
1. I support the issues raised by Stewart and Ralph in their DISCUSS and COMMENT entries.

2. This metrics definitions in this document ...
2011-05-12 13 Dan Romascanu [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded
2011-05-12 13 Ron Bonica
[Ballot comment]
While I share concerns about RFC 2119 language and IPR, I will let other ADs hold those DISCUSSes. Otherwise, this is a very ...
2011-05-12 13 Ron Bonica [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded
2011-05-12 13 Robert Sparks [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded
2011-05-12 13 Sean Turner [Ballot comment]
I support Stephen's discuss position.
2011-05-12 13 Sean Turner [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded
2011-05-12 13 Pete Resnick
[Ballot comment]
I really can't figure out why this document uses 2119 language at all, and without explanation I would really prefer to see ...
2011-05-12 13 Pete Resnick [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded
2011-05-12 13 Stephen Farrell
[Ballot discuss]
(1) I don't quite understand how the IPR declaration and the spec match up.
The IPR declaration says you don't need ...
2011-05-12 13 Stephen Farrell [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded
2011-05-12 13 Gonzalo Camarillo [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded
2011-05-11 13 Ralph Droms
[Ballot comment]
1. Terms given definitions and acronyms in the Terminology section are
sometimes unnecessarily expanded in the body of the document.  Why not ...
2011-05-11 13 Ralph Droms
[Ballot discuss]
I have found a few places in the document where some clarification
seems to be required.  They should be easy to fix ...
2011-05-11 13 Ralph Droms [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded
2011-05-11 13 Russ Housley [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded
2011-05-11 13 Stewart Bryant
[Ballot comment]
"Note that the primary focus of this methodology is managed business
class IP networks; i.e. those Ethernet terminated services for which
organizations ...
2011-05-11 13 Stewart Bryant [Ballot discuss]
Please clarify what you mean by:

"If the network is not performing properly in terms of packet loss,
  jitter, etc."
2011-05-11 13 Stewart Bryant [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded
2011-05-09 13 Peter Saint-Andre [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded
2011-05-07 13 Adrian Farrel
[Ballot comment]
The Abstract says:

  In this framework,
  TCP and IP parameters are specified and should be configured as
  recommended.

I think ...
2011-05-07 13 Adrian Farrel [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded
2011-04-30 13 Samuel Weiler Request for Telechat review by SECDIR Completed. Reviewer: Hilarie Orman.
2011-04-21 13 Samuel Weiler Request for Telechat review by SECDIR is assigned to Hilarie Orman
2011-04-21 13 Samuel Weiler Assignment of request for Last Call review by SECDIR to Stephen Kent was rejected
2011-04-20 13 Wesley Eddy [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Wesley Eddy
2011-04-20 13 Wesley Eddy Ballot has been issued
2011-04-20 13 Wesley Eddy Created "Approve" ballot
2011-04-20 13 Wesley Eddy State changed to IESG Evaluation from Waiting for AD Go-Ahead.
2011-04-20 13 (System) State changed to Waiting for AD Go-Ahead from In Last Call.
2011-04-19 13 Wesley Eddy Placed on agenda for telechat - 2011-05-12
2011-04-14 13 Samuel Weiler Request for Last Call review by SECDIR is assigned to Stephen Kent
2011-04-11 13 Amanda Baber We understand that this document doesn't require any IANA actions.
2011-04-06 13 Cindy Morgan
> Framework for TCP Throughput Testing
> draft-ietf-ippm-tcp-throughput-tm-12.txt
>
> (1.a) Who is the Document Shepherd for this document? Has the
> Document ...
2011-04-06 13 Amy Vezza Last call sent
2011-04-06 13 Amy Vezza
State changed to In Last Call from Last Call Requested.

The following Last Call Announcement was sent out:

From: The IESG <iesg-secretary@ietf.org ...
2011-04-06 13 Wesley Eddy Last Call was requested
2011-04-06 13 (System) Ballot writeup text was added
2011-04-06 13 (System) Last call text was added
2011-04-06 13 (System) Ballot approval text was added
2011-04-06 13 Wesley Eddy State changed to Last Call Requested from AD Evaluation.
2011-04-06 13 Wesley Eddy [Note]: changed to 'Document shepherd is Henk Uijterwaal (henk@ripe.net).'
2011-04-06 13 Wesley Eddy Responsible AD has been changed to Wesley Eddy from Lars Eggert
2011-04-06 13 Wesley Eddy State changed to AD Evaluation from AD is watching.
2011-02-25 13 Lars Eggert State changed to AD is watching from AD Evaluation::AD Followup.
Back to WG for a new WGLC.
2011-02-23 12 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-ippm-tcp-throughput-tm-12.txt
2011-01-31 13 (System) Sub state has been changed to AD Follow up from New Id Needed
2011-01-31 11 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-ippm-tcp-throughput-tm-11.txt
2011-01-26 13 Lars Eggert State changed to AD Evaluation::Revised ID Needed from AD Evaluation::External Party.
2011-01-02 10 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-ippm-tcp-throughput-tm-10.txt
2010-12-07 09 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-ippm-tcp-throughput-tm-09.txt
2010-11-16 13 Lars Eggert State changed to AD Evaluation::External Party from AD Evaluation::AD Followup.
Being reviewed by TCP experts.
2010-11-14 13 (System) Sub state has been changed to AD Follow up from New Id Needed
2010-11-14 08 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-ippm-tcp-throughput-tm-08.txt
2010-10-11 13 Lars Eggert State changed to AD Evaluation::Revised ID Needed from AD Evaluation by Lars Eggert
2010-10-11 13 Lars Eggert State changed to AD Evaluation from Publication Requested by Lars Eggert
2010-10-04 13 Amy Vezza
Framework for TCP Throughput Testing
draft-ietf-ippm-tcp-throughput-tm-07.txt

(1.a) Who is the Document Shepherd for this document? Has the
Document Shepherd personally reviewed this version ...
2010-10-04 13 Amy Vezza Draft Added by Amy Vezza in state Publication Requested
2010-10-04 13 Amy Vezza [Note]: 'Document sheperd is Henk Uijterwaal (henk@ripe.net).' added by Amy Vezza
2010-09-24 07 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-ippm-tcp-throughput-tm-07.txt
2010-08-30 06 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-ippm-tcp-throughput-tm-06.txt
2010-08-13 05 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-ippm-tcp-throughput-tm-05.txt
2010-07-09 04 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-ippm-tcp-throughput-tm-04.txt
2010-06-11 03 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-ippm-tcp-throughput-tm-03.txt
2010-05-18 02 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-ippm-tcp-throughput-tm-02.txt
2010-05-03 01 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-ippm-tcp-throughput-tm-01.txt
2010-04-16 00 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-ippm-tcp-throughput-tm-00.txt