An FTP Application Layer Gateway (ALG) for IPv6-to-IPv4 Translation
RFC 6384

Note: This ballot was opened for revision 12 and is now closed.

(David Harrington; former steering group member) Yes

(Wesley Eddy; former steering group member) Yes

This is a well-written and well-motivated document.

(Adrian Farrel; former steering group member) No Objection

(Gonzalo Camarillo; former steering group member) No Objection

(Jari Arkko; former steering group member) No Objection

(Pete Resnick; former steering group member) No Objection

(Peter Saint-Andre; former steering group member) No Objection

(Ralph Droms; former steering group member) No Objection

(Robert Sparks; former steering group member) No Objection

(Ron Bonica; former steering group member) No Objection

(Russ Housley; former steering group member) No Objection

(Sean Turner; former steering group member) No Objection

#1)  It's probably worth expanding ALG in the title.  It's not expanded in the abstract and as a security guy I  thought you were going to be talking about an Algorithm ;)

#2) Section 4 includes:

  As such,
  it is recommended to update FTP clients and servers as required for
  IPv6-to-IPv4 translation support where possible, to allow proper
  operation of the FTP protocol without the need for ALGs.

r/recommended/RECOMMENDED?

#3) Section 5: missing right parenthesis: ([RFC4217]

#4) I think you need a normative reference for UTF-8.

(Stewart Bryant; former steering group member) No Objection