IP Router Alert Considerations and Usage
RFC 6398
Yes
No Objection
Recuse
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 10 and is now closed.
(Jari Arkko; former steering group member) Yes
(Ralph Droms; former steering group member) Yes
(Ron Bonica; former steering group member) (was Discuss) Yes
1) You might want to find another word for "punt". This word may not be understood by those not familiar with American Football or Rugby.
(Dan Romascanu; former steering group member) No Objection
I support Sean's DISCUSS about the document updating the Security Considerations sections of the RAO defining documents. I support Ron's DISCUSS. I support Wesley's COMMENT. Actually I think it has almost a DISCUSS value, as the document makes distinction in a few places between processing (and not only speed of processing) on the fast path and slow path.
(David Harrington; former steering group member) No Objection
(Gonzalo Camarillo; former steering group member) No Objection
(Pete Resnick; former steering group member) (was Discuss) No Objection
I think this document would do fine as a standards track document instead of a BCP.
(Peter Saint-Andre; former steering group member) No Objection
In Section 3, it would be good to expand "DOS" on first use and add an informative reference to RFC 4732.
(Robert Sparks; former steering group member) No Objection
(Russ Housley; former steering group member) No Objection
The Gen-ART Review by Miguel Garcia on 13-Jul-2011 includes two
editorial comments:
- Make sure that "Router Alert Option" is written with capital "O"
across the document. There are a few instances with a lower "o".
- Expand acronyms at first occurrence. This includes: ASIC
(Sean Turner; former steering group member) (was Discuss) No Objection
(Stephen Farrell; former steering group member) No Objection
(Stewart Bryant; former steering group member) No Objection
(Wesley Eddy; former steering group member) No Objection
definition of fast-path should mention that this is the nominal processing path within a router for datagrams, and then the slow-path definition should say that this is a sub-nominal processing path for packets that require special processing or differ from assumptions made in fast path heuristics.
(Adrian Farrel; former steering group member) Recuse
I wouldn't mind my name being spelled right :-)