Skip to main content

The Group Domain of Interpretation
RFC 6407

Yes

(Sean Turner)

No Objection

(Adrian Farrel)
(Peter Saint-Andre)
(Robert Sparks)
(Ron Bonica)
(Russ Housley)
(Stewart Bryant)
(Wesley Eddy)

Note: This ballot was opened for revision 11 and is now closed.

(Sean Turner; former steering group member) Yes

Yes ()

                            

(Adrian Farrel; former steering group member) (was Discuss) No Objection

No Objection ()

                            

(Gonzalo Camarillo; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection (2011-08-07)
The draft says it describes an "updated" version of GDOI. However, the draft seems to obsolete the previous spec, not to update it. In any case, this has already been captured in Adrian's discuss.

(Peter Saint-Andre; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ()

                            

(Robert Sparks; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ()

                            

(Ron Bonica; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ()

                            

(Russ Housley; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ()

                            

(Stephen Farrell; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection (2011-08-09)
(1) Shouldn't DES and other algorithms be deprecated more obviously? E.g.
5.3.2.1 doesn't say not to do this. Same question for MD5 in SIG_HASH_MD5
etc.

(2) Has anything been learned about authorizing GKCS's since rfc 3547? If so,
wouldn't it be good to include something about that, even if it doesn't provide
a fool-proof way to authorize a host as a GKCS? (Text like that would go nicely
in 3.1 I think.)

(Stewart Bryant; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ()

                            

(Wesley Eddy; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ()