Reducing the Standards Track to Two Maturity Levels
RFC 6410

Revision differences

Document history

Date Rev. By Action
2015-10-14
09 (System) Notify list changed from housley@vigilsec.com, dcrocker@bbiw.net, eburger@standardstrack.com, draft-housley-two-maturity-levels@ietf.org to (None)
2012-08-22
09 (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the Yes position for Peter Saint-Andre
2012-08-22
09 (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Pete Resnick
2012-08-22
09 (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Ralph Droms
2011-10-11
09 Amy Vezza State changed to RFC Published from RFC Ed Queue.
2011-10-10
09 (System) RFC published
2011-09-13
09 Amy Vezza State changed to RFC Ed Queue from Approved-announcement sent.
2011-09-12
09 (System) IANA Action state changed to No IC from In Progress
2011-09-12
09 (System) IANA Action state changed to In Progress
2011-09-12
09 Amy Vezza IESG state changed to Approved-announcement sent
2011-09-12
09 Amy Vezza IESG has approved the document
2011-09-12
09 Amy Vezza Closed "Approve" ballot
2011-09-12
09 Amy Vezza Approval announcement text regenerated
2011-09-12
09 Amy Vezza Ballot writeup text changed
2011-09-08
09 Cindy Morgan Removed from agenda for telechat
2011-09-08
09 Cindy Morgan State changed to Approved-announcement to be sent::Point Raised - writeup needed from IESG Evaluation.
2011-09-08
09 (System) [Ballot Position Update] Position for Pete Resnick has been changed to No Objection from Discuss by IESG Secretary
2011-09-07
09 Ralph Droms
[Ballot comment]
Thank you for addressing my earlier DISCUSS and COMMENT issues.

It looks to me as though there is still a bit of redundancy ...
2011-09-07
09 Ralph Droms [Ballot Position Update] Position for Ralph Droms has been changed to No Objection from Discuss
2011-09-02
09 Stephen Farrell
[Ballot comment]
I'm changing to Yes on this based on the recent mails to
ietf-discuss. I continue to think there is rough consensus for
2 ...
2011-09-02
09 Stephen Farrell [Ballot Position Update] Position for Stephen Farrell has been changed to Yes from No Objection
2011-09-01
09 (System) New version available: draft-housley-two-maturity-levels-09.txt
2011-08-30
09 Stephen Farrell
[Ballot comment]
I still don't know from reading this if STD numbers will be
allocated for "Internet Standard" RFCs.  I don't mind if
they are ...
2011-08-29
09 Jari Arkko Placed on agenda for telechat - 2011-09-08
2011-08-29
09 Jari Arkko State changed to IESG Evaluation from Waiting for AD Go-Ahead.
2011-08-24
09 (System) State changed to Waiting for AD Go-Ahead from In Last Call.
2011-08-01
09 Amanda Baber We understand that this document doesn't require any IANA actions.
2011-08-01
09 Peter Saint-Andre [Ballot Position Update] Position for Peter Saint-Andre has been changed to Yes from Discuss
2011-07-27
09 Amy Vezza Last call sent
2011-07-27
09 Amy Vezza
State changed to In Last Call from Last Call Requested.

The following Last Call Announcement was sent out:

From: The IESG <iesg-secretary@ietf.org>
To: IETF-Announce <ietf-announce@ietf.org> ...
2011-07-27
09 Jari Arkko Last Call was requested
2011-07-27
09 Jari Arkko State changed to Last Call Requested from IESG Evaluation::AD Followup.
2011-07-27
09 Jari Arkko Last Call text changed
2011-06-26
08 (System) New version available: draft-housley-two-maturity-levels-08.txt
2011-06-25
09 (System) Sub state has been changed to AD Follow up from New Id Needed
2011-06-25
07 (System) New version available: draft-housley-two-maturity-levels-07.txt
2011-06-23
09 Cindy Morgan Removed from agenda for telechat
2011-06-23
09 Cindy Morgan State changed to IESG Evaluation::Revised ID Needed from IESG Evaluation::AD Followup.
2011-06-22
09 Stewart Bryant
[Ballot comment]
nit - Introduction

"This document proposes several changes " should presumably be "This document makes several changes "

I am concerned about the ...
2011-06-22
09 Stewart Bryant
[Ballot discuss]
I am concerned about the following:

Note that the distinct requirement from RFC 2026 [1] for reports of
interoperability testing among two or ...
2011-06-22
09 Stewart Bryant [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded
2011-06-17
09 Dan Romascanu [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded
2011-06-09
09 Cindy Morgan Telechat date has been changed to 2011-06-23 from 2011-06-09
2011-06-09
09 Cindy Morgan State changed to IESG Evaluation::AD Followup from IESG Evaluation.
2011-06-09
09 Amy Vezza State changed to IESG Evaluation from Waiting for AD Go-Ahead.
2011-06-09
09 Gonzalo Camarillo [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded
2011-06-08
09 Ralph Droms
[Ballot discuss]
I support the intention and the specifics in this document, and intend
to vote "yes" after we have discussed a couple of points.  ...
2011-06-08
09 Ralph Droms [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded
2011-06-08
09 Pete Resnick
[Ballot discuss]
I agree fully with Peter's DISCUSS. He summarized much better than I could have.

I do believe that there probably *is* agreement on ...
2011-06-08
09 Pete Resnick [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded
2011-06-08
09 Ron Bonica [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded
2011-06-08
09 Peter Saint-Andre
[Ballot discuss]
I would love to ballot "Yes" on this document.  However, having reviewed
the feedback provided during IETF Last Call, I am not comfortable ...
2011-06-08
09 Peter Saint-Andre
[Ballot discuss]
I would love to ballot "Yes" on this document.  However, having reviewed
the feedback provided during IETF Last Call, I am not comfortable ...
2011-06-08
09 Peter Saint-Andre [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded
2011-06-08
09 Adrian Farrel [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded
2011-06-08
09 Stephen Farrell
[Ballot comment]
(1) "limited to the changes" - might be good to make it clear
that all text changes are up for checking. Otherwise someone ...
2011-06-08
09 Stephen Farrell [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded
2011-06-08
09 David Harrington [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded
2011-06-07
09 Wesley Eddy [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded
2011-06-07
09 Robert Sparks [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded
2011-06-07
09 Sean Turner
[Ballot comment]
Section 2 contains the following:

  Experience with a Proposed Standard often leads to revisions that
  clarify, modify, enhance, or remove features.  ...
2011-06-07
09 Sean Turner [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded
2011-06-07
09 Russ Housley [Ballot Position Update] New position, Recuse, has been recorded
2011-06-07
09 Jari Arkko [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Jari Arkko
2011-06-07
09 Jari Arkko Ballot has been issued
2011-06-07
09 Jari Arkko Created "Approve" ballot
2011-06-02
09 (System) State changed to Waiting for AD Go-Ahead from In Last Call.
2011-05-11
09 Amanda Baber We understand that this document doesn't require any IANA actions.
2011-05-05
09 Cindy Morgan
State changed to In Last Call from Last Call Requested.

The following Last Call Announcement was sent out:

From: The IESG <iesg-secretary@ietf.org>
To: IETF-Announce <ietf-announce@ietf.org> ...
2011-05-05
09 Jari Arkko Placed on agenda for telechat - 2011-06-09
2011-05-05
09 Jari Arkko Last Call was requested
2011-05-05
09 Jari Arkko State changed to Last Call Requested from AD Evaluation.
2011-05-05
09 Jari Arkko Last Call text changed
2011-05-05
09 (System) Ballot writeup text was added
2011-05-05
09 (System) Last call text was added
2011-05-05
09 (System) Ballot approval text was added
2011-05-05
09 Jari Arkko
State changed to AD Evaluation from AD Evaluation::AD Followup.
I have now reviewed discussion back to late 2010. I think we can move ahead, and ...
2011-05-05
09 Jari Arkko
State changed to AD Evaluation::AD Followup from AD Evaluation.
I have reviewed this version of the document, and I believe it is ready to move ...
2011-05-05
09 Jari Arkko State changed to AD Evaluation from Publication Requested.
2011-04-20
09 Amy Vezza
(1.a) Who is the Document Shepherd for this document? Has the
Document Shepherd personally reviewed this version of the document
and, in particular, does he ...
2011-04-20
09 Amy Vezza Draft added in state Publication Requested
2011-04-20
09 Amy Vezza [Note]: 'Russ Housley (housley@vigilsec.com) is the document shepherd.' added
2011-04-19
06 (System) New version available: draft-housley-two-maturity-levels-06.txt
2011-04-06
05 (System) New version available: draft-housley-two-maturity-levels-05.txt
2011-03-13
04 (System) New version available: draft-housley-two-maturity-levels-04.txt
2011-01-24
03 (System) New version available: draft-housley-two-maturity-levels-03.txt
2010-09-01
02 (System) New version available: draft-housley-two-maturity-levels-02.txt
2010-06-23
01 (System) New version available: draft-housley-two-maturity-levels-01.txt
2010-06-19
00 (System) New version available: draft-housley-two-maturity-levels-00.txt