Benchmarking Terminology for Protection Performance
RFC 6414

Revision differences

Document history

Date Rev. By Action
2017-05-16
09 (System) Changed document authors from "Scott Poretsky" to "Scott Poretsky, Jay Karthik, Samir Vapiwala, Rajiv Papneja"
2015-10-14
09 (System) Notify list changed from bmwg-chairs@ietf.org, draft-ietf-bmwg-protection-term@ietf.org to (None)
2012-08-22
09 (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Peter Saint-Andre
2012-08-22
09 (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Lars Eggert
2011-11-22
09 Amy Vezza State changed to RFC Published from RFC Ed Queue.
2011-11-21
09 (System) RFC published
2010-08-10
09 (System) IANA Action state changed to No IC from In Progress
2010-08-10
09 (System) IANA Action state changed to In Progress
2010-08-09
09 Cindy Morgan State Changes to RFC Ed Queue from Approved-announcement sent by Cindy Morgan
2010-08-06
09 Cindy Morgan IESG state changed to Approved-announcement sent
2010-08-06
09 Cindy Morgan IESG has approved the document
2010-08-06
09 Cindy Morgan Closed "Approve" ballot
2010-07-12
09 Ron Bonica State Changes to Approved-announcement to be sent from IESG Evaluation::AD Followup by Ron Bonica
2010-07-11
09 Lars Eggert [Ballot Position Update] Position for Lars Eggert has been changed to No Objection from Discuss by Lars Eggert
2010-07-08
09 Peter Saint-Andre [Ballot discuss]
[cleared]
2010-07-08
09 Peter Saint-Andre [Ballot Position Update] Position for Peter Saint-Andre has been changed to No Objection from Discuss by Peter Saint-Andre
2010-07-08
09 (System) Sub state has been changed to AD Follow up from New Id Needed
2010-07-08
09 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-bmwg-protection-term-09.txt
2010-06-20
09 Samuel Weiler Request for Last Call review by SECDIR Completed. Reviewer: Rob Austein.
2010-06-18
09 (System) Removed from agenda for telechat - 2010-06-17
2010-06-17
09 Cindy Morgan State Changes to IESG Evaluation::Revised ID Needed from IESG Evaluation by Cindy Morgan
2010-06-17
09 Dan Romascanu [Ballot comment]
It looks to me that 'Benchmarking Terminology for Performance of sub-IP layer Protection Mechanisms' would be a more apropriate name for this document.
2010-06-17
09 Dan Romascanu [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded by Dan Romascanu
2010-06-17
09 Gonzalo Camarillo [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Gonzalo Camarillo
2010-06-17
09 Jari Arkko [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Jari Arkko
2010-06-16
09 Adrian Farrel [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Adrian Farrel
2010-06-16
09 Adrian Farrel
[Ballot comment]
I have a huge raft of issues and concerns about this document. In the
end I raised a COMMENT not a DISCUSS because ...
2010-06-16
09 Robert Sparks [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Robert Sparks
2010-06-16
09 Russ Housley [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Russ Housley
2010-06-16
09 Stewart Bryant
[Ballot comment]
I am not sure that RFC2119 language is appropriate here

  Figures 1 through 5 show models that MAY be used when benchmarking ...
2010-06-16
09 Stewart Bryant [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Stewart Bryant
2010-06-16
09 Sean Turner [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Sean Turner
2010-06-15
09 Tim Polk
[Ballot comment]
I suspect this is clear enough for its intended audience, but a more detailed description of the
calculations in 3.6.1 and ...
2010-06-15
09 Tim Polk
[Ballot comment]
I suspect this is clear enough for its intended audience, but a more detailed description of the
calculations in 3.6.1 and ...
2010-06-15
09 Tim Polk
[Ballot comment]
I suspect this is clear enough for its intended audience, but a more detailed description of the
calculations in 3.6.1 and ...
2010-06-15
09 Tim Polk [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Tim Polk
2010-06-15
09 Peter Saint-Andre
[Ballot discuss]
1. The document does not pass ID-nits.

  http://tools.ietf.org/tools/idnits/

2. This is a very interesting normative reference:

  ...
2010-06-15
09 Peter Saint-Andre [Ballot Position Update] Position for Peter Saint-Andre has been changed to Discuss from No Objection by Peter Saint-Andre
2010-06-15
09 Peter Saint-Andre [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Peter Saint-Andre
2010-06-14
09 Lars Eggert
[Ballot comment]
>                    Benchmarking Terminology
>                    for ...
2010-06-14
09 Lars Eggert
[Ballot discuss]
Section 3., paragraph 0:
> 3. Test Considerations

  DISCUSS: Some of the "discussion" sections of the definitions in
  Sections 3.1-3 ...
2010-06-14
09 Lars Eggert [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded by Lars Eggert
2010-06-01
09 Ron Bonica [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Ronald Bonica
2010-06-01
09 Ron Bonica Ballot has been issued by Ron Bonica
2010-06-01
09 Ron Bonica Created "Approve" ballot
2010-06-01
09 Ron Bonica State Changes to IESG Evaluation from Waiting for AD Go-Ahead by Ron Bonica
2010-06-01
09 Ron Bonica Placed on agenda for telechat - 2010-06-17 by Ron Bonica
2010-05-14
09 (System) State has been changed to Waiting for AD Go-Ahead from In Last Call by system
2010-05-10
09 Amanda Baber IANA comments:

As described in the IANA Considerations section, we understand this
document to have NO IANA Actions.
2010-05-03
09 Samuel Weiler Request for Last Call review by SECDIR is assigned to Rob Austein
2010-04-30
09 Amy Vezza Last call sent
2010-04-30
09 Amy Vezza State Changes to In Last Call from Last Call Requested by Amy Vezza
2010-04-30
09 Ron Bonica State Changes to Last Call Requested from AD Evaluation by Ron Bonica
2010-04-30
09 Ron Bonica Last Call was requested by Ron Bonica
2010-04-30
09 (System) Ballot writeup text was added
2010-04-30
09 (System) Last call text was added
2010-04-30
09 (System) Ballot approval text was added
2010-04-23
09 Ron Bonica State Changes to AD Evaluation from Publication Requested by Ron Bonica
2010-04-12
09 Amy Vezza
This is a publication request for
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-bmwg-protection-term-08
as an INFORMATIONAL RFC.

    (1.a) Who is the Document Shepherd ...
2010-04-12
09 Amy Vezza Draft Added by Amy Vezza in state Publication Requested
2010-04-12
09 Amy Vezza [Note]: 'Al Morton (acmorton@att.com) is the shepherd.' added by Amy Vezza
2009-12-21
08 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-bmwg-protection-term-08.txt
2009-10-16
07 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-bmwg-protection-term-07.txt
2009-03-08
06 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-bmwg-protection-term-06.txt
2008-11-03
05 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-bmwg-protection-term-05.txt
2008-02-25
04 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-bmwg-protection-term-04.txt
2007-11-13
03 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-bmwg-protection-term-03.txt
2007-07-09
02 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-bmwg-protection-term-02.txt
2007-03-08
01 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-bmwg-protection-term-01.txt
2006-10-16
00 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-bmwg-protection-term-00.txt