Multiple Interfaces and Provisioning Domains Problem Statement
RFC 6418

Revision differences

Document history

Date Rev. By Action
2015-10-14
15 (System) Notify list changed from mif-chairs@ietf.org, draft-ietf-mif-problem-statement@ietf.org to (None)
2012-08-22
15 (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Sean Turner
2012-08-22
15 (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Ralph Droms
2011-11-22
15 Amy Vezza State changed to RFC Published from RFC Ed Queue.
2011-11-21
15 (System) RFC published
2011-09-06
15 (System) IANA Action state changed to No IC from In Progress
2011-09-06
15 (System) IANA Action state changed to In Progress
2011-09-06
15 Amy Vezza State changed to RFC Ed Queue from Approved-announcement sent.
2011-09-02
15 Amy Vezza IESG state changed to Approved-announcement sent
2011-09-02
15 Amy Vezza IESG has approved the document
2011-09-02
15 Amy Vezza Closed "Approve" ballot
2011-09-02
15 Amy Vezza Approval announcement text regenerated
2011-09-02
15 Amy Vezza Ballot writeup text changed
2011-09-01
15 Jari Arkko State changed to Approved-announcement to be sent from IESG Evaluation::AD Followup.
2011-09-01
15 Ralph Droms
[Ballot comment]
I've cleared my Discuss position.

However, the minor changes regarding the term "provisioning domain" and the action "attach to a provisioning domain" have ...
2011-09-01
15 Ralph Droms [Ballot Position Update] Position for Ralph Droms has been changed to No Objection from Discuss
2011-05-09
15 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-mif-problem-statement-15.txt
2011-04-27
14 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-mif-problem-statement-14.txt
2011-04-25
15 Ralph Droms
[Ballot discuss]
(Edited based on e-mail discussion of previous DISCUSS)

I don't understand the behavior described as "attached to a
provisioning domain" and the process ...
2011-04-22
15 Ralph Droms
[Ballot discuss]
I have not completed my detailed write-up for the revised document.  I
do have a couple of issues that we can work through ...
2011-04-21
15 Adrian Farrel [Ballot comment]
Thank you for the series of revisions to this I-D which I believe go far enough to allow me to clear my Discuss.
2011-04-21
15 Adrian Farrel [Ballot comment]
Thanks you for the series of revisions to this I-D which I believe go far enough to allow me to clear my Discuss.
2011-04-21
15 Adrian Farrel [Ballot Position Update] Position for Adrian Farrel has been changed to No Objection from Discuss
2011-04-13
13 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-mif-problem-statement-13.txt
2011-04-12
12 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-mif-problem-statement-12.txt
2011-03-28
11 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-mif-problem-statement-11.txt
2011-03-11
15 Sean Turner [Ballot Position Update] Position for Sean Turner has been changed to No Objection from Discuss
2011-03-11
15 (System) Sub state has been changed to AD Follow up from New Id Needed
2011-03-11
10 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-mif-problem-statement-10.txt
2011-01-06
15 Sean Turner
[Ballot discuss]
This is an updated position.

An updated DISCUSS that includes a reference to the SECDIR review.

This is a placeholder DISCUSS while the ...
2010-12-07
15 Jari Arkko State Changes to IESG Evaluation::Revised ID Needed from IESG Evaluation::AD Followup by Jari Arkko
2010-11-07
00 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-mif-problem-statement-00.txt
2010-10-25
09 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-mif-problem-statement-09.txt
2010-10-25
15 (System) Sub state has been changed to AD Follow up from New Id Needed
2010-10-25
08 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-mif-problem-statement-08.txt
2010-08-27
15 (System) Removed from agenda for telechat - 2010-08-26
2010-08-26
15 Cindy Morgan State changed to IESG Evaluation::Revised ID Needed from Waiting for AD Go-Ahead by Cindy Morgan
2010-08-26
15 Adrian Farrel
[Ballot discuss]
I have not seen any discussion of the Routing Area Directorate review performed by Joel Halpern. I should like to see the issues ...
2010-08-26
15 Adrian Farrel [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded by Adrian Farrel
2010-08-26
15 Sean Turner
[Ballot discuss]
An updated DISCUSS that includes a reference to the SECDIR review.

This is a placeholder DISCUSS while the authors, AD, and SECDIR reviewer ...
2010-08-26
15 Ron Bonica [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Ron Bonica
2010-08-26
15 Sean Turner [Ballot discuss]
This is a placeholder DISCUSS while the authors, AD, and SECDIR reviewer work on some expanded text for the security considerations section.
2010-08-26
15 Sean Turner [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded by Sean Turner
2010-08-26
15 Russ Housley
[Ballot comment]
My concern is already captured in DISCUSS posiotns held by Ralph,
  so I am not going to pile on.  However, I do ...
2010-08-26
15 Russ Housley [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Russ Housley
2010-08-26
15 Alexey Melnikov [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Alexey Melnikov
2010-08-25
15 Ralph Droms
[Ballot comment]
Some of the symptoms don't derive from the stated operational environments.  For example, in section 4.1:

  3.  H1 keeps only one set ...
2010-08-25
15 Ralph Droms
[Ballot discuss]
I have a fundamental problem with the way in which this document characterizes the problems resulting from the simultaneous use of multiple interfaces ...
2010-08-25
15 Ralph Droms [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded by Ralph Droms
2010-08-25
15 Dan Romascanu
[Ballot comment]
This is an useful document. The comments below are not blocking, but in case they are considered they could improve readability:

1. In ...
2010-08-25
15 Dan Romascanu [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Dan Romascanu
2010-08-25
15 Samuel Weiler Request for Last Call review by SECDIR Completed. Reviewer: Joseph Salowey.
2010-08-24
15 Stewart Bryant [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Stewart Bryant
2010-08-24
15 Robert Sparks
[Ballot comment]
Some very minor editorial suggestions:

Is there a missing word (I think "may" at "may have") in the first sentence of
the introduction? ...
2010-08-24
15 Robert Sparks [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Robert Sparks
2010-08-23
15 Lars Eggert
[Ballot comment]
INTRODUCTION, paragraph 4:
>    of its provisioning domain.  Some configuration objects are global to

  Nit: s/domain/domains/

Section 1., paragraph 1:
>  ...
2010-08-23
15 Lars Eggert
[Ballot discuss]
Section 3., paragraph 1:
>        2.  Interfaces of a MIF host can provide different
>            ...
2010-08-23
15 Lars Eggert [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded by Lars Eggert
2010-08-23
15 (System) State has been changed to Waiting for AD Go-Ahead from In Last Call by system
2010-08-16
15 Samuel Weiler Request for Last Call review by SECDIR is assigned to Joseph Salowey
2010-08-16
15 Samuel Weiler Request for Last Call review by SECDIR is assigned to Joseph Salowey
2010-08-14
07 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-mif-problem-statement-07.txt
2010-08-11
15 Michelle Cotton IANA Last Call Comments:

IANA understands that, upon approval of this document, there are no IANA Actions
that must be completed.
2010-08-11
06 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-mif-problem-statement-06.txt
2010-08-09
15 Amy Vezza Last call sent
2010-08-09
15 Amy Vezza State Changes to In Last Call from Last Call Requested by Amy Vezza
2010-08-09
15 Jari Arkko State Changes to Last Call Requested from AD Evaluation::AD Followup by Jari Arkko
2010-08-09
15 Jari Arkko Last Call was requested by Jari Arkko
2010-08-09
15 Jari Arkko [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Jari Arkko
2010-08-09
15 Jari Arkko Ballot has been issued by Jari Arkko
2010-08-09
15 Jari Arkko Created "Approve" ballot
2010-08-09
15 (System) Ballot writeup text was added
2010-08-09
15 (System) Last call text was added
2010-08-09
15 (System) Ballot approval text was added
2010-08-09
15 Jari Arkko Placed on agenda for telechat - 2010-08-26 by Jari Arkko
2010-08-09
15 Jari Arkko
New version looks reasonable. Remaining comments:

I have reviewed the new version. It is much better, thanks! I have sent the draft forward to IETF ...
2010-07-06
15 (System) Sub state has been changed to AD Follow up from New Id Needed
2010-07-06
05 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-mif-problem-statement-05.txt
2010-06-08
15 Jari Arkko State Changes to AD Evaluation::Revised ID Needed from AD Evaluation by Jari Arkko
2010-06-08
15 Jari Arkko
I have reviewed this draft.

It has a good discussion of the problem space, but still needs some work. My detailed comments are below. But ...
2010-06-01
15 Jari Arkko State Changes to AD Evaluation from Publication Requested by Jari Arkko
2010-05-28
15 Amy Vezza
Shepherd Write-Up for draft-ietf-mif-problem-statement:

# (1.a) Who is the Document Shepherd for this document? Has the Document # Shepherd personally reviewed this version of the ...
2010-05-28
15 Amy Vezza Draft Added by Amy Vezza in state Publication Requested
2010-05-28
15 Amy Vezza [Note]: 'The document shepherd is Hui Deng (denghui02@hotmail.com).' added by Amy Vezza
2010-05-17
04 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-mif-problem-statement-04.txt
2010-05-04
03 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-mif-problem-statement-03.txt
2010-03-08
02 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-mif-problem-statement-02.txt
2009-10-26
01 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-mif-problem-statement-01.txt