Skip to main content

MPLS On-Demand Connectivity Verification and Route Tracing
RFC 6426

Yes


No Objection

(David Harrington)
(Pete Resnick)
(Robert Sparks)
(Ron Bonica)
(Stephen Farrell)
(Stewart Bryant)
(Wesley Eddy)

Note: This ballot was opened for revision 07 and is now closed.

(Adrian Farrel; former steering group member) (was No Objection, Discuss, Yes) Yes

Yes (2011-09-27)
Clearing my Discuss as I understand that the next revision will complete addressing all Last Call comments.

(Dan Romascanu; former steering group member) (was Discuss) No Objection

No Objection (2011-08-23)
1. in section 1.1: 

   o  LSP-Ping: refers to the mechanism - particularly as defined and
      used in referenced material;

What referenced material? need to be specific or provide at least an example

2. In section 4.2.3: 

All responses MUST always be sent on a LSP path  ...

The word 'always' can be dropped if MUST is used in the sentence.

(David Harrington; former steering group member) (was Discuss) No Objection

No Objection ()

                            

(Pete Resnick; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ()

                            

(Peter Saint-Andre; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection (2011-08-23)
Please specify the byte order of the longer binary fields. Although network byte order (the most significant byte first) is almost universally used, there are some exceptions, so it is important to spell this out.

(Robert Sparks; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ()

                            

(Ron Bonica; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ()

                            

(Russ Housley; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection (2011-08-24)
  The Abstract ends with "... new address type and requesting an IANA
  registry."  The IANA registration will take place before the document
  is published as an RFC.  At this stage, the Abstract needs to be
  written as the final RFC, not the Internet-Draft.

  The bottom of page 6 says:
  >
  > Address Type will be 5 (as shown in Section 2.1 above.
  >
  There is a missing ')'.

(Sean Turner; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection (2011-08-24)
The sentence "When set to zero, the field is not applicable" occurs a couple of times in the draft.  Is "not applicable" have the same meaning as "these bits are ignored"?  If so, I think it'd be clearer to say "these bits are ignored."

(Stephen Farrell; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ()

                            

(Stewart Bryant; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ()

                            

(Wesley Eddy; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ()