Skip to main content

TCP Sender Clarification for Persist Condition
RFC 6429

Yes

(Wesley Eddy)

No Objection

(David Harrington)
(Gonzalo Camarillo)
(Pete Resnick)
(Ron Bonica)
(Russ Housley)
(Stephen Farrell)

Note: This ballot was opened for revision 07 and is now closed.

(Wesley Eddy; former steering group member) Yes

Yes ()

                            

(Adrian Farrel; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection (2011-06-09)
Support David and Pete's Discusses

(David Harrington; former steering group member) (was Discuss) No Objection

No Objection ()

                            

(Gonzalo Camarillo; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ()

                            

(Pete Resnick; former steering group member) (was Discuss) No Objection

No Objection ()

                            

(Peter Saint-Andre; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection (2011-06-07)
Please expand "DoS" on first use and add an informative reference to RFC 4732.

(Ralph Droms; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection (2011-06-07)
Are the phrases "Zero-Window Probe (ZWP)", 'persist condition', "ZWP
state" and "ZWP or persist condition" all equivalent?  If so, for
consistency, choose one and use it throughout.

At the end of section 3, for clarity, I suggest changing:

OLD:

   to persist legitimate connections

NEW:

   to maintain legitimate connections in persist condition

(Ron Bonica; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ()

                            

(Russ Housley; former steering group member) (was Discuss) No Objection

No Objection ()

                            

(Sean Turner; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection (2011-06-09)
I'm with Dave on this - shouldn't this draft include "Updates: 1122 (once approved)" in the header?  If it is updating 1122 then doesn't it have to go standards track?

(Stephen Farrell; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ()

                            

(Stewart Bryant; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection (2011-05-23)
   "Systems that adhere too strictly to the above verbiage of"

Comment: In English English I would not  consider "verbiage" to be polite to the author of RFC1122.