IPv6 Node Requirements
RFC 6434
Yes
No Objection
Recuse
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 11 and is now closed.
(Ralph Droms; former steering group member) Yes
(Ron Bonica; former steering group member) Yes
(Adrian Farrel; former steering group member) No Objection
(Gonzalo Camarillo; former steering group member) No Objection
(Pete Resnick; former steering group member) No Objection
I agree with Peter's DISCUSS comment.
(Peter Saint-Andre; former steering group member) (was Discuss) No Objection
(Robert Sparks; former steering group member) No Objection
(Russ Housley; former steering group member) No Objection
(Sean Turner; former steering group member) (was Discuss) No Objection
This is an updated comment (I moved my discuss here): #1) Consider adding DNSSEC to the title of 7.1. #2) There are quite a number of errata reported on the RFCs referenced in this draft: 2460, 4861, 4191, 3971, 1981, 2675, 4443, 4291, 4941, 3315, 5952. Resolving these would aid, some might say greatly aid, implementers. Is there any chance of getting a group of reviewers comprised of some subset of the august body of authors/contributors from 4294 and this document to address the errata?
(Stephen Farrell; former steering group member) No Objection
(Stewart Bryant; former steering group member) No Objection
(Wesley Eddy; former steering group member) No Objection
(Jari Arkko; former steering group member) (was Yes) Recuse