Skip to main content

IPv6 Node Requirements
RFC 6434

Yes

(Ralph Droms)
(Ron Bonica)

No Objection

(Adrian Farrel)
(Gonzalo Camarillo)
(Peter Saint-Andre)
(Robert Sparks)
(Russ Housley)
(Stephen Farrell)
(Stewart Bryant)
(Wesley Eddy)

Recuse

(Jari Arkko)

Note: This ballot was opened for revision 11 and is now closed.

Ralph Droms Former IESG member
Yes
Yes ()

                            
Ron Bonica Former IESG member
Yes
Yes ()

                            
Adrian Farrel Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection ()

                            
Gonzalo Camarillo Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection ()

                            
Pete Resnick Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection (2011-07-13)
I agree with Peter's DISCUSS comment.
Peter Saint-Andre Former IESG member
(was Discuss) No Objection
No Objection ()

                            
Robert Sparks Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection ()

                            
Russ Housley Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection ()

                            
Sean Turner Former IESG member
(was Discuss) No Objection
No Objection (2011-07-14)
This is an updated comment (I moved my discuss here):

#1) Consider adding DNSSEC to the title of 7.1.

#2) There are quite a number of errata reported on the RFCs referenced in this draft: 2460, 4861, 4191, 3971, 1981, 2675, 4443, 4291, 4941, 3315, 5952.  Resolving these would aid, some might say greatly aid, implementers.

Is there any chance of getting a group of reviewers comprised of some subset of the august body of authors/contributors from 4294 and this document to address the errata?
Stephen Farrell Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection ()

                            
Stewart Bryant Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection ()

                            
Wesley Eddy Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection ()

                            
Jari Arkko Former IESG member
(was Yes) Recuse
Recuse ()