Skip to main content

Using the IPv6 Flow Label for Equal Cost Multipath Routing and Link Aggregation in Tunnels
RFC 6438

Yes

(Jari Arkko)

No Objection

(Dan Romascanu)
(David Harrington)
(Gonzalo Camarillo)
(Pete Resnick)
(Ralph Droms)
(Ron Bonica)
(Russ Housley)
(Stephen Farrell)
(Wesley Eddy)

Note: This ballot was opened for revision 05 and is now closed.

(Jari Arkko; former steering group member) Yes

Yes ()

                            

(Adrian Farrel; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection (2011-07-13)
There is no mention of the fact that individual nodes in a network are free to implement different algorithms without impacting the interoperability or function of the network.

(Dan Romascanu; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ()

                            

(David Harrington; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ()

                            

(Gonzalo Camarillo; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ()

                            

(Pete Resnick; former steering group member) (was Discuss) No Objection

No Objection ()

                            

(Peter Saint-Andre; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection (2011-07-11)
I agree with the DISCUSS from Pete Resnick that this seems like a Standards Track document, not a BCP.

(Ralph Droms; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ()

                            

(Robert Sparks; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection (2011-07-11)
I found this document clear and hope it has the impact the group intends.
I support Pete's discuss though - why did the group choose BCP as the intended status for this document?

(Ron Bonica; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ()

                            

(Russ Housley; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ()

                            

(Sean Turner; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection (2011-07-14)
Maybe add (e.g., by using IPsec between the two tunnel end-points) to the end of the 2nd sentence in the security considerations.  Just to provide an example of how it might be done.

(Stephen Farrell; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ()

                            

(Stewart Bryant; former steering group member) (was Discuss) No Objection

No Objection (2011-07-13)
A reference to draft-ietf-mpls-entropy-label-00 would seem appropriate since they seek to achieve the same though at different layers.

(Wesley Eddy; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ()