Time to Remove Filters for Previously Unallocated IPv4 /8s
RFC 6441

Note: This ballot was opened for revision 04 and is now closed.

(Jari Arkko) Yes

(Ron Bonica) Yes

(Gonzalo Camarillo) No Objection

(Ralph Droms) No Objection

(Wesley Eddy) No Objection

Comment (2011-10-18)
No email
send info
Support Stephen's DISCUSS and agree with Adrian's COMMENT.

(Adrian Farrel) No Objection

Comment (2011-10-17)
No email
send info
If there are no more unallocated /8s, I cannot understand how a filter for unallocated /8s would be in any way a problem.

The second paragraph of the Abstract and the Introduction is, therefore, confusing.

I think this could be clarified in terms of the language in the first paragraph about "unallocated address space." Or you could use the language of section 3.2.

(Stephen Farrell) (was Discuss) No Objection

(David Harrington) No Objection

(Russ Housley) No Objection

(Pete Resnick) No Objection

Comment (2011-10-18)
No email
send info
Windmill tilt: I see no reason that this can't be a Proposed Standard in that it is giving implementation advice.

(Peter Saint-Andre) No Objection

(Robert Sparks) No Objection

(Sean Turner) No Objection