Skip to main content

RTP Payload Format for DV (IEC 61834) Video
RFC 6469

Yes

(Robert Sparks)

No Objection

(Adrian Farrel)
(Gonzalo Camarillo)
(Jari Arkko)
(Peter Saint-Andre)
(Ralph Droms)
(Ron Bonica)
(Sean Turner)
(Stephen Farrell)
(Stewart Bryant)
(Wesley Eddy)

Note: This ballot was opened for revision 03 and is now closed.

(Robert Sparks; former steering group member) Yes

Yes ()

                            

(Adrian Farrel; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ()

                            

(Dan Romascanu; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection (2011-10-30)
1. In the intorduction the following phrase is duplicated in adjoining paragraphs: 

> In the future it can be extended into other video formats managed by
   80 byte DV Digital Interface Format (DIF) block.

2. Please expand at the first occurence IEC, SMPTE, MLDv2, LW-IGMPv3

3. It is not clear what is the meaning of the statement in the interoperability section 8: 

> In addition, the SDP examples in RFC3189 provides incorrect SDP
   "a=fmtp" attribute usage.

Is the example made not relevant or corrected by this document? Why does it show in the interoperability section 8 and not in section 7 (changes from RFC 3189)?

(Gonzalo Camarillo; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ()

                            

(Jari Arkko; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ()

                            

(Pete Resnick; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection (2011-10-30)
Sent in email to IANA as well: RFC 3189 ought to have registered audio/DV when it was published in 2002, yet there is no registration for audio/DV. IANA should probably register audio/DV now with a pointer to 3189 and simply update to this document once approved.

(Peter Saint-Andre; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ()

                            

(Ralph Droms; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ()

                            

(Ron Bonica; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ()

                            

(Russ Housley; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection (2011-10-30)
  The Gen-ART Review by Francis Dupont on 14-Oct-2011 includes a few
  editorial suggestions.  Please consider them.

  - S3.3.1, page 14: I suggest m=* in place of m=??

  - S4, page 15: in general encryption is done after compression for
  crypto reasons and common sense: quality encryption gives a random
  result, i.e., something impossible to compress...

(Sean Turner; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ()

                            

(Stephen Farrell; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ()

                            

(Stewart Bryant; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ()

                            

(Wesley Eddy; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ()