Network Configuration Protocol (NETCONF) Base Notifications
RFC 6470

Note: This ballot was opened for revision 07 and is now closed.

(Jari Arkko) Yes

(David Harrington) Yes

Comment (2011-11-30 for -)
No email
send info
The security consideratiions could be improved by discussing what threat is posed by the specific data points. 

For example, netconf-config-change "indicates that the system configurastion has changed." I don't understand just what vulnerability this describes; is the concern about disclosing information about the system? or alerting a listening attacker that the system might now be more vulnerable? The sensitivity/vulnerability is not described. Ditto for many of these bullets.

(Dan Romascanu) Yes

(Ron Bonica) No Objection

(Stewart Bryant) No Objection

(Gonzalo Camarillo) No Objection

(Wesley Eddy) No Objection

(Adrian Farrel) No Objection

(Stephen Farrell) No Objection

(Russ Housley) No Objection

Comment (2011-11-29 for -)
No email
send info
  idnits 2.12.12 reported:

    Unused Reference: 'RFC6021' is defined on line 623, but no explicit
    reference was found in the text

(Pete Resnick) No Objection

(Peter Saint-Andre) No Objection

Comment (2011-11-29 for -)
No email
send info
[comment redacted]

(Robert Sparks) No Objection

(Sean Turner) No Objection

Comment (2011-11-28 for -)
No email
send info
I assume the ";" in the following could be removed:

     } // container changed-by-parms;

it just stuck out because none of the other single line comments ended with ;.