Skip to main content

Resource Public Key Infrastructure (RPKI) Objects Issued by IANA
RFC 6491

Yes

(Alexey Melnikov)
(Sean Turner)
(Tim Polk)

No Objection

(Adrian Farrel)
(David Harrington)
(Peter Saint-Andre)
(Ralph Droms)
(Ron Bonica)

Note: This ballot was opened for revision 03 and is now closed.

Alexey Melnikov Former IESG member
(was Discuss) Yes
Yes (2011-03-21)

                            
Robert Sparks Former IESG member
Yes
Yes (2011-03-15)
A document providing "specific direction to IANA" (and for which an interop statement is never going to make sense) would fit better as a BCP - why was PS chosen instead? 
Sean Turner Former IESG member
Yes
Yes ()

                            
Tim Polk Former IESG member
Yes
Yes ()

                            
Adrian Farrel Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection ()

                            
Dan Romascanu Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection (2011-03-16)
I support Alexey's DISCUSS and I have one supplementary question concerning the following paragraph in Section 5: 

>    IANA SHOULD issue an AS0 ROA for all reserved IPv4 and IPv6 resources
   not intended to be routed.

Why is this a should? Why not a MUST? If there are exceptions does IANA know and understand all cases when they apply? 
David Harrington Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection ()

                            
Jari Arkko Former IESG member
(was Discuss) No Objection
No Objection (2011-03-17)
What kind of change/CRL/processing load is expected from certification of unallocated space at IANA, as that space keeps changing (in the case IPv6)?

From Ari Keränen's review: 

8.  Multicast

   IANA MUST NOT issue any ROAs (AS0 or otherwise) for any other
   multicast addresses unless directed.

Directed by whom? Need to have, e.g., IESG Approval?
Peter Saint-Andre Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection ()

                            
Ralph Droms Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection ()

                            
Ron Bonica Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection ()

                            
Russ Housley Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection (2011-03-16)
  Please consider the comment from the Gen-ART Review by
  Wassim Haddad on 16-Mar-2011.  I believe that improved clarity
  is desirable.
Stewart Bryant Former IESG member
(was Discuss, Yes) No Objection
No Objection (2011-05-16)
Thank you for addressing Alexey's Discuss's and the IESG review coments.