Media Gateway Control Protocol (MGCP) Voiceband Data (VBD) Package and General-Purpose Media Descriptor Parameter Package
RFC 6498
Revision differences
Document history
Date | Rev. | By | Action |
---|---|---|---|
2015-10-14
|
10 | (System) | Notify list changed from joestone@cisco.com, s.sharma@cablelabs.com, rkumar@cisco.com, draft-stone-mgcp-vbd@ietf.org, fandreas@cisco.com to s.sharma@cablelabs.com |
2012-08-22
|
10 | (System) | post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Sean Turner |
2012-03-01
|
10 | (System) | RFC published |
2011-12-19
|
10 | (System) | IANA Action state changed to RFC-Ed-Ack from Waiting on RFC Editor |
2011-12-19
|
10 | (System) | IANA Action state changed to Waiting on RFC Editor from Waiting on Authors |
2011-12-08
|
10 | Amy Vezza | State changed to RFC Ed Queue from Approved-announcement sent. |
2011-12-07
|
10 | (System) | IANA Action state changed to Waiting on Authors from In Progress |
2011-12-07
|
10 | (System) | IANA Action state changed to In Progress |
2011-12-07
|
10 | Amy Vezza | IESG state changed to Approved-announcement sent |
2011-12-07
|
10 | Amy Vezza | IESG has approved the document |
2011-12-07
|
10 | Amy Vezza | Closed "Approve" ballot |
2011-12-07
|
10 | Amy Vezza | Approval announcement text regenerated |
2011-12-07
|
10 | Amy Vezza | State changed to Approved-announcement to be sent from IESG Evaluation::AD Followup. |
2011-12-05
|
10 | Sean Turner | [Ballot Position Update] Position for Sean Turner has been changed to No Objection from Discuss |
2011-12-05
|
10 | (System) | New version available: draft-stone-mgcp-vbd-10.txt |
2011-08-06
|
10 | (System) | Sub state has been changed to AD Follow up from New Id Needed |
2011-08-06
|
09 | (System) | New version available: draft-stone-mgcp-vbd-09.txt |
2010-12-03
|
10 | Samuel Weiler | Request for Telechat review by SECDIR Completed. Reviewer: Carl Wallace. |
2010-12-03
|
10 | (System) | Removed from agenda for telechat - 2010-12-02 |
2010-12-02
|
10 | Cindy Morgan | State changed to IESG Evaluation::Revised ID Needed from IESG Evaluation. |
2010-12-02
|
10 | Tim Polk | [Ballot comment] I support Sean's discuss. I would like to clarify if (1) there is a mandatory to implement security mechanism, or (2) if it … [Ballot comment] I support Sean's discuss. I would like to clarify if (1) there is a mandatory to implement security mechanism, or (2) if it is mandatory to implement one of the two security mechanisms. Either (1) or (2) is okay, but I think it would be bad if the answer to both is "NO". Additional detail is definitely needed to have interoperable implementations using IPsec. I think additional information on SRTP is also required, but I could be wrong. :) |
2010-12-02
|
10 | Tim Polk | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded |
2010-12-02
|
10 | Jari Arkko | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Jari Arkko |
2010-12-02
|
10 | Russ Housley | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded |
2010-12-02
|
10 | Sean Turner | [Ballot comment] #1) Section 9: r/securuty/security |
2010-12-02
|
10 | Sean Turner | [Ballot discuss] #1) The security considerations recommend both IPsec and SRTP, but one is not specified as the mandatory-to-implement. In order to achieve interop one … [Ballot discuss] #1) The security considerations recommend both IPsec and SRTP, but one is not specified as the mandatory-to-implement. In order to achieve interop one needs to be picked or are you suggesting both be used? #2) The security considerations say use IPsec as the end-to-end protection scheme. It needs to say a whole lot more. See Section 8 of RFC 5406. #3) In the same veil is just pointing at SRTP sufficient to get two interoperable solutions? |
2010-12-02
|
10 | Sean Turner | [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded |
2010-12-02
|
10 | Robert Sparks | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded |
2010-12-01
|
10 | Adrian Farrel | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded |
2010-12-01
|
10 | Ron Bonica | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded |
2010-12-01
|
10 | Peter Saint-Andre | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded |
2010-12-01
|
10 | Stewart Bryant | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded |
2010-11-30
|
10 | Lars Eggert | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded |
2010-11-22
|
10 | Samuel Weiler | Request for Telechat review by SECDIR is assigned to Carl Wallace |
2010-11-22
|
10 | Samuel Weiler | Request for Telechat review by SECDIR is assigned to Carl Wallace |
2010-11-16
|
10 | Gonzalo Camarillo | [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Gonzalo Camarillo |
2010-11-16
|
10 | Gonzalo Camarillo | Ballot has been issued |
2010-11-16
|
10 | Gonzalo Camarillo | Created "Approve" ballot |
2010-11-16
|
10 | Gonzalo Camarillo | State changed to IESG Evaluation from Waiting for AD Go-Ahead::AD Followup. |
2010-11-16
|
10 | Gonzalo Camarillo | Placed on agenda for telechat - 2010-12-02 |
2010-11-16
|
10 | Gonzalo Camarillo | Status Date has been changed to 2010-11-16 from 2010-05-14 |
2010-10-13
|
10 | (System) | Sub state has been changed to AD Follow up from New Id Needed |
2010-10-13
|
08 | (System) | New version available: draft-stone-mgcp-vbd-08.txt |
2010-07-16
|
10 | Gonzalo Camarillo | Area acronymn has been changed to rai from gen |
2010-07-16
|
10 | Gonzalo Camarillo | State Changes to Waiting for AD Go-Ahead::Revised ID Needed from Waiting for AD Go-Ahead by Gonzalo Camarillo |
2010-07-16
|
10 | Gonzalo Camarillo | We need a revised I-D to address the IETF LC comments. In particular, the security review by Carl Wallace and the Gen ART review by … We need a revised I-D to address the IETF LC comments. In particular, the security review by Carl Wallace and the Gen ART review by Wassim Haddad. |
2010-07-09
|
10 | (System) | State has been changed to Waiting for AD Go-Ahead from In Last Call by system |
2010-06-24
|
10 | Samuel Weiler | Request for Last Call review by SECDIR Completed. Reviewer: Carl Wallace. |
2010-06-16
|
10 | Amanda Baber | IANA questions/comments: - Do you want/need a registry of Symbols defined in Section 3.1? - Do you want/need a registry of CoordinationTechniques as defined in … IANA questions/comments: - Do you want/need a registry of Symbols defined in Section 3.1? - Do you want/need a registry of CoordinationTechniques as defined in Section 3.1.1? - Do you want/need a registry of ReasonCodes as defined in Section 3.1.1? - In Section 4.1 you define a LocalConnectionOption but don't register it in the LocalConnectionOptions Sub-Registry. Should you register this option? Upon approval of this document, IANA will make the following assignments in the "Media Gateway Control Protocol (MGCP) Package Registry" registry located at http://www.iana.org/assignments/mgcp-packages/mgcp-packages.xhtml sub-registry "MGCP Package Sub-Registry" Package Title Name Version Reference ------------ ---- ------- --------- Voiceband Data VBD 0 [RFC-stone-mgcp-vbd-07] General-Purpose Media Descriptor Parameter GPMD 0 [RFC-stone-mgcp-vbd-07] We understand the above to be the only IANA Action for this document. |
2010-06-11
|
10 | Samuel Weiler | Request for Last Call review by SECDIR is assigned to Carl Wallace |
2010-06-11
|
10 | Samuel Weiler | Request for Last Call review by SECDIR is assigned to Carl Wallace |
2010-06-11
|
10 | Amy Vezza | Last call sent |
2010-06-11
|
10 | Amy Vezza | State Changes to In Last Call from Last Call Requested by Amy Vezza |
2010-06-11
|
10 | Gonzalo Camarillo | Last Call was requested by Gonzalo Camarillo |
2010-06-11
|
10 | (System) | Ballot writeup text was added |
2010-06-11
|
10 | (System) | Last call text was added |
2010-06-11
|
10 | (System) | Ballot approval text was added |
2010-06-11
|
10 | Gonzalo Camarillo | State Changes to Last Call Requested from AD Evaluation by Gonzalo Camarillo |
2010-06-10
|
10 | Gonzalo Camarillo | State Changes to AD Evaluation from Expert Review::External Party by Gonzalo Camarillo |
2010-06-10
|
10 | Gonzalo Camarillo | The expert reviewer, Flemming Andreasen, is OK with the document. |
2010-06-10
|
10 | Gonzalo Camarillo | State Change Notice email list have been change to joestone@cisco.com, s.sharma@cablelabs.com, rkumar@cisco.com, draft-stone-mgcp-vbd@tools.ietf.org, fandreas@cisco.com from joestone@cisco.com, s.sharma@cablelabs.com, rkumar@cisco.com, … State Change Notice email list have been change to joestone@cisco.com, s.sharma@cablelabs.com, rkumar@cisco.com, draft-stone-mgcp-vbd@tools.ietf.org, fandreas@cisco.com from joestone@cisco.com, s.sharma@cablelabs.com, rkumar@cisco.com, draft-stone-mgcp-vbd@tools.ietf.org |
2010-06-10
|
10 | Gonzalo Camarillo | Note field has been cleared by Gonzalo Camarillo |
2010-05-14
|
10 | Gonzalo Camarillo | Flemming will be performing an expert review on the draft. |
2010-05-14
|
10 | Gonzalo Camarillo | Draft Added by Gonzalo Camarillo in state Expert Review |
2010-04-05
|
07 | (System) | New version available: draft-stone-mgcp-vbd-07.txt |
2009-10-16
|
06 | (System) | New version available: draft-stone-mgcp-vbd-06.txt |
2009-07-10
|
05 | (System) | New version available: draft-stone-mgcp-vbd-05.txt |
2009-03-04
|
04 | (System) | New version available: draft-stone-mgcp-vbd-04.txt |
2009-01-04
|
10 | (System) | Document has expired |
2008-07-03
|
03 | (System) | New version available: draft-stone-mgcp-vbd-03.txt |
2007-11-16
|
02 | (System) | New version available: draft-stone-mgcp-vbd-02.txt |
2007-06-07
|
01 | (System) | New version available: draft-stone-mgcp-vbd-01.txt |
2007-02-26
|
00 | (System) | New version available: draft-stone-mgcp-vbd-00.txt |