Centralized Conferencing Manipulation Protocol
RFC 6503

Revision differences

Document history

Date Rev. By Action
2015-10-14 15 (System) Notify list changed from xcon-chairs@ietf.org, draft-ietf-xcon-ccmp@ietf.org to (None)
2012-08-22 15 (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Pete Resnick
2012-08-22 15 (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Peter Saint-Andre
2012-08-22 15 (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Stephen Farrell
2012-08-22 15 (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Adrian Farrel
2012-03-25 15 (System) RFC published
2012-03-13 15 Robert Sparks
This comment is added to demonstrate a bug in the datatracker code.

Auth48 status:  http://www.rfc-editor.org/queue2.html#draft-ietf-xcon-ccmp still shows one ...
2011-12-02 15 (System) IANA Action state changed to RFC-Ed-Ack from Waiting on RFC Editor
2011-12-02 15 (System) IANA Action state changed to Waiting on RFC Editor from In Progress
2011-12-02 15 (System) IANA Action state changed to In Progress from Waiting on Authors
2011-10-07 15 (System) IANA Action state changed to Waiting on Authors from In Progress
2011-10-07 15 (System) IANA Action state changed to In Progress from Waiting on Authors
2011-10-03 15 (System) IANA Action state changed to Waiting on Authors from In Progress
2011-09-26 15 Amy Vezza State changed to RFC Ed Queue from Approved-announcement sent.
2011-09-23 15 (System) IANA Action state changed to In Progress
2011-09-23 15 Amy Vezza IESG state changed to Approved-announcement sent
2011-09-23 15 Amy Vezza IESG has approved the document
2011-09-23 15 Amy Vezza Closed "Approve" ballot
2011-09-23 15 Amy Vezza Approval announcement text regenerated
2011-09-23 15 Amy Vezza State changed to Approved-announcement to be sent from IESG Evaluation::AD Followup.
2011-08-09 15 Stephen Farrell
[Ballot comment]
---

-15 fixed the last thing - mention of HTTP proxy auth (thanks)

--- original discuss on -13, addressed by -14

(1) Not requiring HTTP or ...
2011-08-09 15 Stephen Farrell
[Ballot discuss]
The remaining discuss point emerged from discussion of the
original discuss on -13, but doesn't seem to be reflected in
-14.

>> ...
2011-08-09 15 Stephen Farrell [Ballot Position Update] Position for Stephen Farrell has been changed to No Objection from Discuss
2011-08-03 15 Adrian Farrel [Ballot comment]
Thanks for addressing my Discuss
2011-08-03 15 Adrian Farrel [Ballot Position Update] Position for Adrian Farrel has been changed to No Objection from Discuss
2011-08-02 15 Sean Turner [Ballot Position Update] Position for Sean Turner has been changed to No Objection from Discuss
2011-08-02 15 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-xcon-ccmp-15.txt
2011-07-28 15 Pete Resnick
[Ballot comment]
As with draft-ietf-xcon-common-data-model, section 3 of this document repeats things from RFC 5239. I think this introduces a danger that the documents will ...
2011-07-28 15 Pete Resnick [Ballot Position Update] Position for Pete Resnick has been changed to No Objection from Discuss
2011-07-27 15 Sean Turner
[Ballot comment]
#1) addressed

#2) addressed

#3) addressed

#4) addressed

#5) Sec 10.1 - A reference to RFC 6125 is needed to ensure the server ...
2011-07-27 15 Sean Turner
[Ballot discuss]
This is an updated discuss based on -14:

This is an updated discuss.  1-4 and 6 were addressed in -14.  asking ...
2011-07-18 15 Stephen Farrell
[Ballot comment]
--- original discuss on -13, addressed by -14

(1) Not requiring HTTP or TLS client-authentication mechanism seems to me to be
a mistake. Its ...
2011-07-18 15 Stephen Farrell
[Ballot discuss]
The remaining discuss point emerged from discussion of the
original discuss on -13, but doesn't seem to be reflected in
-14.

>> ...
2011-07-13 15 Peter Saint-Andre [Ballot comment]
All of my feedback has been addressed in -14. Thank you.
2011-07-13 15 Peter Saint-Andre [Ballot Position Update] Position for Peter Saint-Andre has been changed to No Objection from Discuss
2011-07-11 15 (System) Sub state has been changed to AD Follow up from New Id Needed
2011-07-11 14 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-xcon-ccmp-14.txt
2011-05-31 15 Samuel Weiler Request for Telechat review by SECDIR Completed. Reviewer: Stephen Kent.
2011-05-26 15 Cindy Morgan Removed from agenda for telechat
2011-05-26 15 Cindy Morgan State changed to IESG Evaluation::Revised ID Needed from IESG Evaluation.
2011-05-26 15 Gonzalo Camarillo [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded
2011-05-26 15 Jari Arkko [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded
2011-05-26 15 Ron Bonica [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded
2011-05-26 15 Dan Romascanu
[Ballot comment]
The OPS-DIR review performed by Juergen Quittek raised a few issues and made a number of suggestions. None of them are critical, but ...
2011-05-26 15 Dan Romascanu [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded
2011-05-25 15 Stephen Farrell
[Ballot comment]
(1) This could do with being rephrased. "Their identifiers, respectively the
conference XCON-URI and the conferencing client XCON-USERID, and their XML
representations compliant ...
2011-05-25 15 Stephen Farrell
[Ballot discuss]
(1) Not requiring HTTP or TLS client-authentication mechanism seems to me to be
a mistake. Its more likely that HTTP authentication will be ...
2011-05-25 15 Stephen Farrell [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded
2011-05-25 15 Pete Resnick
[Ballot comment]
Intro to section 4:

  CCMP is a client-server, XML-based protocol, which has been
  specifically conceived to provide users with the necessary ...
2011-05-25 15 Pete Resnick
[Ballot discuss]
As with draft-ietf-xcon-common-data-model, section 3 of this document repeats things from RFC 5239. I think this introduces a danger that the documents will ...
2011-05-25 15 Pete Resnick [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded
2011-05-25 15 Adrian Farrel
[Ballot comment]
BTW, I appreciated the many examples, although they might have been
moved to an appendix to clear the floor for the main meat ...
2011-05-25 15 Adrian Farrel
[Ballot discuss]
A very weighty tome that I cannot pretend to have read in full detail.
I am relying on the WG and responsible ADs ...
2011-05-25 15 Adrian Farrel [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded
2011-05-25 15 Pete Resnick
[Ballot comment]
[In progress - Will likely become DISCUSS]

Strike all of section 3. Completely redundant with RFC 5239.

Intro to section 4:

  CCMP is ...
2011-05-25 15 Peter Saint-Andre
[Ballot comment]
1. Section 4 states:

  The conference
  server must ensure that the operations are atomic in that the
  operation invoked by ...
2011-05-25 15 Peter Saint-Andre
[Ballot discuss]
1. Section 4.2 appears to assume that HTTP is the transport; for
example:

  If the
  modifications are all successfully applied ...
2011-05-25 15 Peter Saint-Andre [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded
2011-05-25 15 Sean Turner
[Ballot comment]
#1) Section 5.1 subject references AAA, a reference is needed - it kind of came out of the blue.

[MB] Okay. [/MB]

#2 ...
2011-05-25 15 Sean Turner
[Ballot comment]
#1) Section 5.1 subject references AAA, a reference is needed - it kind of came out of the blue.

[MB] Okay. [/MB]

#2 ...
2011-05-25 15 Sean Turner
[Ballot discuss]
This is an updated discuss.  I've included the authors responses to the first 4 between [MB] and [/MB].  #5 and ...
2011-05-25 15 Pete Resnick
[Ballot comment]
[In progress - Will likely become DISCUSS]

This document is too long. Much of it can be attributed to importing text from other normatively ...
2011-05-25 15 Pete Resnick
[Ballot comment]
[In progress]

This document is too long. Much of it can be attributed to importing text from other normatively referenced documents. Some of ...
2011-05-25 15 Ralph Droms
[Ballot comment]
What is the scope of the uniqueness for an XCON-USERID?  Is
XCON-USERID intended to be used across multiple conferences or is it ...
2011-05-25 15 Ralph Droms [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded
2011-05-24 15 Russ Housley [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded
2011-05-23 15 Sean Turner
[Ballot comment]
#1) Section 5.1 subject references AAA, a reference is needed - it kind of came out of the blue.

#2) Sec 6 message ...
2011-05-23 15 Sean Turner
[Ballot comment]
#1) Section 5.1 subject references AAA, a reference is needed - it kind of came out of the blue.

#2) Sec 6 message ...
2011-05-23 15 Sean Turner
[Ballot discuss]
#1) This document sometimes uses optional and mandatory to indicate support requirements.  These should be changed to use 2119 language.  E ...
2011-05-23 15 Sean Turner [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded
2011-05-23 15 Stewart Bryant [Ballot comment]
On the basis of trusting that others who have greater knowledge of this subject matter have reviewed this document I am voting no-objection.
2011-05-23 15 Stewart Bryant [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded
2011-05-19 15 Samuel Weiler Request for Telechat review by SECDIR is assigned to Stephen Kent
2011-05-18 15 Wesley Eddy [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded
2011-05-12 15 Amy Vezza Placed on agenda for telechat - 2011-05-26 by Amy Vezza
2011-05-12 15 Robert Sparks State changed to IESG Evaluation from Waiting for AD Go-Ahead.
2011-05-12 15 Robert Sparks [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Robert Sparks
2011-05-12 15 Robert Sparks Ballot has been issued
2011-05-12 15 Robert Sparks Created "Approve" ballot
2011-05-09 13 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-xcon-ccmp-13.txt
2011-03-04 15 Amanda Baber
IANA understands that, upon approval of this document, there are seven
IANA Actions that need to be completed.

First, in the Namespace registry of the ...
2011-03-04 15 (System) State changed to Waiting for AD Go-Ahead from In Last Call.
2011-02-26 15 Samuel Weiler Request for Last Call review by SECDIR Completed. Reviewer: Stephen Kent.
2011-02-22 15 Samuel Weiler Request for Last Call review by SECDIR is assigned to Stephen Kent
2011-02-18 15 Cindy Morgan Last call sent
2011-02-18 15 Cindy Morgan
State changed to In Last Call from Last Call Requested.

The following Last Call Announcement was sent out:

From: The IESG
To: IETF-Announce
CC:
Reply-To ...
2011-02-18 15 Robert Sparks Last Call was requested
2011-02-18 15 Robert Sparks State changed to Last Call Requested from AD Evaluation::AD Followup.
2011-02-18 15 Robert Sparks Last Call text changed
2011-02-18 15 (System) Ballot writeup text was added
2011-02-18 15 (System) Last call text was added
2011-02-18 15 (System) Ballot approval text was added
2011-02-18 15 Robert Sparks Ballot writeup text changed
2011-02-16 12 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-xcon-ccmp-12.txt
2010-10-25 15 (System) Sub state has been changed to AD Follow up from New Id Needed
2010-10-25 11 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-xcon-ccmp-11.txt
2010-09-14 15 Robert Sparks State changed to AD Evaluation::Revised ID Needed from AD Evaluation by Robert Sparks
2010-09-02 15 Robert Sparks State changed to AD Evaluation from Publication Requested by Robert Sparks
2010-08-16 15 Cindy Morgan
(1.a) Who is the Document Shepherd for this document? Has the
Document Shepherd personally reviewed this version of the
document and, in particular, does ...
2010-08-16 15 Cindy Morgan [Note]: changed to 'Alan Johnston (alan.b.johnston@gmail.com) is the Document Shepherd.' by Cindy Morgan
2010-08-16 15 Cindy Morgan Draft added in state Publication Requested by Cindy Morgan
2010-08-16 15 Cindy Morgan Removed from agenda for telechat by Cindy Morgan
2010-08-16 15 Cindy Morgan
[Note]: '(1.a) Who is the Document Shepherd for this document? Has the
Document Shepherd personally reviewed this version of the
document and, in particular ...
2010-07-12 10 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-xcon-ccmp-10.txt
2010-07-02 09 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-xcon-ccmp-09.txt
2010-06-18 08 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-xcon-ccmp-08.txt
2010-04-26 07 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-xcon-ccmp-07.txt
2010-02-17 06 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-xcon-ccmp-06.txt
2009-12-24 05 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-xcon-ccmp-05.txt
2009-11-12 04 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-xcon-ccmp-04.txt
2009-07-13 03 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-xcon-ccmp-03.txt
2009-03-09 02 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-xcon-ccmp-02.txt
2008-11-03 01 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-xcon-ccmp-01.txt
2008-06-17 00 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-xcon-ccmp-00.txt