Host/Host Protocol for the ARPA Network
Draft of message to be sent after approval:
From: The IESG <email@example.com> To: RFC ISE <firstname.lastname@example.org> Cc: The IESG <email@example.com>, <firstname.lastname@example.org>, <email@example.com> Subject: Results of IETF-conflict review for <draft-mckenzie-arpanet-host-host-protocol-01.txt> The IESG has completed a review of <draft-mckenzie-arpanet-host-host-protocol> consistent with RFC5742. This review is applied to all non-IETF streams. The IESG has no problem with the publication of 'Host/Host Protocol for the ARPA Network' <draft-mckenzie-arpanet-host-host-protocol-01.txt> as a Historic. The IESG would also like the RFC-Editor to review the comments in the datatracker (http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-mckenzie-arpanet-host-host-protocol/) related to this document and determine whether or not they merit incorporation into the document. Comments may exist in both the ballot and the comment log. A URL of this Internet Draft is: http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-mckenzie-arpanet-host-host-protocol/ The process for such documents is described at http://www.rfc-editor.org/indsubs.html Thank you, The IESG Secretary
IESG Note The IESG has concluded that there is no conflict between this document and IETF work. Further, no IESG Note is requested. COMMENTS FOR ISE I strongly encourage the RFC Editor to work with the authors to replace this URL: http://alexmckenzie.weebly.com/hosthost-protocol-for-the-arpa-network.html with a PDF version of the document that contains the introduction that appears in the Internet-Draft followed by the scanned Document Number 1. In this way, the figures, italic text, and bold text can be preserved in the RFC series itself. Further, the ASCII version of the RFC can replace this reference will a pointer to the PDF version of the RFC. Section 2 says: "... TCP is usually referred to as a layer 3 protocol." This is not correct. TCP is usually considered the Transport Layer, which is layer 4.