Skip to main content

The Host Identity Protocol (HIP) Experiment Report
RFC 6538

Revision differences

Document history

Date Rev. By Action
2015-10-14
15 (System) Notify list changed from thomas.r.henderson@boeing.com, gurtov@hiit.fi, draft-irtf-hip-experiment@ietf.org to (None)
2012-03-25
15 (System) RFC published
2012-01-06
15 Cindy Morgan State changed to RFC Ed Queue from Approved-announcement sent.
2011-12-16
15 (System) New version available: draft-irtf-hip-experiment-15.txt
2011-11-07
15 Cindy Morgan IESG state changed to Approved-announcement sent
2011-11-07
15 Cindy Morgan IESG has approved the document
2011-11-07
15 Cindy Morgan Closed "Approve" ballot
2011-11-07
15 Cindy Morgan Approval announcement text changed
2011-11-07
15 Cindy Morgan Approval announcement text regenerated
2011-11-07
15 Cindy Morgan Ballot writeup text changed
2011-11-03
15 Cindy Morgan Removed from agenda for telechat
2011-11-03
15 Cindy Morgan State changed to Approved-announcement to be sent from IESG Evaluation.
2011-11-03
15 Dan Romascanu
[Ballot comment]
A very good document. I would like to see more of this type describing experience in implementation and deployment of protocols developped in …
[Ballot comment]
A very good document. I would like to see more of this type describing experience in implementation and deployment of protocols developped in the IETF.
2011-11-03
15 Dan Romascanu [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded
2011-11-03
15 Gonzalo Camarillo [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded
2011-11-03
15 Jari Arkko [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded
2011-11-02
15 Pete Resnick [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded
2011-11-02
15 Wesley Eddy [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded
2011-11-02
15 Robert Sparks [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded
2011-11-02
15 Ron Bonica [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded
2011-11-02
15 Stephen Farrell
[Ballot comment]
- A lot of this document would apply to any overlay or
alternative n/w approach and not just HIP. Might be
worth a …
[Ballot comment]
- A lot of this document would apply to any overlay or
alternative n/w approach and not just HIP. Might be
worth a mention in the abstract?

- not all acronyms are expanded on 1st use, e.g. sigma, beet, tap

- I wondered what were the "controversial experiences" on p10. Seems
a shame to tease the reader like that.

- What is an "I1" on p13? And "I2" on p17. Maybe expand those to
the full message names or something?

- Isn't TKK now Aalto? (p15 & p23)

- A reference for the "double jump mobility" problem on p19
would be good.
2011-11-02
15 Stephen Farrell [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded
2011-11-01
15 Adrian Farrel [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded
2011-11-01
15 Russ Housley [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded
2011-10-31
14 (System) New version available: draft-irtf-hip-experiment-14.txt
2011-10-31
15 Stewart Bryant [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded
2011-10-24
15 Amanda Baber We understand that this document doesn't have any IANA actions.
2011-10-18
15 Ralph Droms Ballot writeup text changed
2011-10-18
15 Ralph Droms State changed to IESG Evaluation from AD Evaluation.
2011-10-18
15 Ralph Droms
[Ballot comment]
It would be helpful to include a terminology section, for those not so
familiar with HIP.

section 1.2: "HIT-based lookups"

  expand HIT …
[Ballot comment]
It would be helpful to include a terminology section, for those not so
familiar with HIP.

section 1.2: "HIT-based lookups"

  expand HIT on first usage

section 2.3.5: Are there any specific references to the "initial
specification attempts?"

  To solve this problem, the HIP layer could
  inform the transport layer of mobility events.  This method, known as
  transport triggers, is still under research although initial
  specification attempts have been made in the IET

section 2.5: I can't quite parse this sentence:

  Although counter-examples exist, e.g.  SCTP is a large
  unit in the kernel, the Linux community resisted incorporating the
  HIP code.

It's not clear to me what SCTP is a counter-example for?

section 3.2: are there an acronym expansions for "HI" and "I2"?

  when the HI is
  encrypted, middleboxes in the network cannot verify the signature of
  the I2
2011-10-18
15 Ralph Droms Placed on agenda for telechat - 2011-11-03
2011-10-18
15 Ralph Droms Ballot has been issued
2011-10-18
15 Ralph Droms Ballot writeup text changed
2011-10-18
15 Ralph Droms [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Ralph Droms
2011-10-18
15 Ralph Droms Ballot has been issued
2011-10-18
15 Ralph Droms Created "Approve" ballot
2011-10-18
15 (System) Ballot writeup text was added
2011-10-18
15 (System) Last call text was added
2011-10-18
15 (System) Ballot approval text was added
2011-10-18
15 Ralph Droms Ballot writeup text changed
2011-10-04
15 Ralph Droms State changed to AD Evaluation from Publication Requested.
2011-09-22
15 Amy Vezza Removed from agenda for telechat
2011-09-22
15 Amy Vezza Responsible AD has been changed to Ralph Droms from Russ Housley
2011-09-21
15 Amy Vezza Draft added in state Publication Requested
2011-09-21
15 Amy Vezza Placed on agenda for telechat - 2011-09-22
2011-09-21
15 Amy Vezza [Note]: 'The document shepherd is Tom Henderson (thomas.r.henderson@boeing.com)' added
2011-07-11
13 (System) New version available: draft-irtf-hip-experiment-13.txt
2011-05-02
12 (System) New version available: draft-irtf-hip-experiment-12.txt
2011-03-14
11 (System) New version available: draft-irtf-hip-experiment-11.txt
2011-02-04
10 (System) New version available: draft-irtf-hip-experiment-10.txt
2010-08-05
09 (System) New version available: draft-irtf-hip-experiment-09.txt
2010-07-26
08 (System) New version available: draft-irtf-hip-experiment-08.txt
2010-07-12
07 (System) New version available: draft-irtf-hip-experiment-07.txt
2010-04-29
15 (System) Document has expired
2009-10-26
06 (System) New version available: draft-irtf-hip-experiment-06.txt
2009-03-09
05 (System) New version available: draft-irtf-hip-experiment-05.txt
2008-07-14
04 (System) New version available: draft-irtf-hip-experiment-04.txt
2007-03-08
03 (System) New version available: draft-irtf-hip-experiment-03.txt
2006-03-08
02 (System) New version available: draft-irtf-hip-experiment-02.txt
2005-07-21
01 (System) New version available: draft-irtf-hip-experiment-01.txt
2004-10-15
00 (System) New version available: draft-irtf-hip-experiment-00.txt