The Routing Protocol for Low-Power and Lossy Networks (RPL) Option for Carrying RPL Information in Data-Plane Datagrams
RFC 6553

Revision differences

Document history

Date Rev. By Action
2015-10-14
06 (System) Notify list changed from 6man-chairs@ietf.org, draft-ietf-6man-rpl-option@ietf.org to (None)
2012-08-22
06 (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the Yes position for Jari Arkko
2012-08-22
06 (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Ralph Droms
2012-08-22
06 (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Stephen Farrell
2012-03-27
06 (System) RFC published
2011-12-22
06 (System) IANA Action state changed to RFC-Ed-Ack from Waiting on RFC Editor
2011-12-22
06 (System) IANA Action state changed to Waiting on RFC Editor from In Progress
2011-12-22
06 (System) IANA Action state changed to In Progress from Waiting on Authors
2011-12-22
06 (System) IANA Action state changed to Waiting on Authors from In Progress
2011-12-21
06 (System) IANA Action state changed to In Progress from Waiting on Authors
2011-12-21
06 Amy Vezza State changed to RFC Ed Queue from Approved-announcement sent.
2011-12-20
06 (System) IANA Action state changed to Waiting on Authors from In Progress
2011-12-20
06 (System) IANA Action state changed to In Progress
2011-12-20
06 Amy Vezza IESG state changed to Approved-announcement sent
2011-12-20
06 Amy Vezza IESG has approved the document
2011-12-20
06 Amy Vezza Closed "Approve" ballot
2011-12-20
06 Amy Vezza Approval announcement text regenerated
2011-12-20
06 Amy Vezza Ballot writeup text changed
2011-12-20
06 Jari Arkko State changed to Approved-announcement to be sent from IESG Evaluation::AD Followup.
2011-12-18
06 Ralph Droms
[Ballot comment]
Discuss cleared, 2011/12/18.  Disposition of previous Discuss points:

1. From section 4:

  Datagrams sent between RPL routers MUST include a RPL Option ...
2011-12-18
06 Ralph Droms [Ballot discuss]
1. Moved to a Comment, based on updated text in rev -06.
2011-12-18
06 Ralph Droms [Ballot Position Update] Position for Ralph Droms has been changed to No Objection from Discuss
2011-12-15
06 Cindy Morgan Removed from agenda for telechat
2011-12-14
06 Jari Arkko Placed on agenda for telechat - 2011-12-15
2011-12-14
06 Stephen Farrell [Ballot comment]
2011-12-14
06 Stephen Farrell
[Ballot discuss]
Same discuss point as for the other RPL doc. Should have the same
solution as well.

What countermeasures exist for the attacks listed ...
2011-12-14
06 Stephen Farrell [Ballot Position Update] Position for Stephen Farrell has been changed to No Objection from Discuss
2011-12-14
06 (System) Sub state has been changed to AD Follow up from New Id Needed
2011-12-14
06 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-6man-rpl-option-06.txt
2011-12-04
06 Samuel Weiler Request for Last Call review by SECDIR Completed. Reviewer: Matt Lepinski.
2011-12-01
06 Cindy Morgan Removed from agenda for telechat
2011-12-01
06 Cindy Morgan State changed to IESG Evaluation::Revised ID Needed from IESG Evaluation.
2011-12-01
06 Jari Arkko [Ballot comment]
Sorry, posted the IANA issue in wrong tracker window...
2011-12-01
06 Jari Arkko [Ballot Position Update] Position for Jari Arkko has been changed to Yes from Discuss
2011-12-01
06 Jari Arkko
[Ballot discuss]
Holding a discuss for IANA:

IESG:

IANA has questions about draft-ietf-6man-rpl-routing-header-04.txt:

The IANA Considerations section asks us to register the following:

1) a ...
2011-12-01
06 Jari Arkko [Ballot Position Update] Position for Jari Arkko has been changed to Discuss from Yes
2011-12-01
06 Gonzalo Camarillo [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded
2011-11-30
06 Pete Resnick [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded
2011-11-30
06 Sean Turner [Ballot comment]
I support Stephen's discuss.
2011-11-30
06 Sean Turner [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded
2011-11-30
06 Peter Saint-Andre [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded
2011-11-30
06 Adrian Farrel
[Ballot comment]
I have no objection to the publication of this document, but I have a umber of questions/nits that I hope you will consider. ...
2011-11-30
06 Adrian Farrel [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded
2011-11-29
06 Ralph Droms
[Ballot discuss]
1. The first sentence of section 4:

  Datagrams sent between RPL routers MUST include a RPL Option or RPL
  Source Route ...
2011-11-29
06 Ralph Droms [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded
2011-11-29
06 Ron Bonica [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded
2011-11-29
06 Robert Sparks
[Ballot comment]
Please double-check the first paragraph of section 4 to make sure that "ICMPv6 errors generated by inserting the RPL option" is really what ...
2011-11-29
06 Robert Sparks [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded
2011-11-29
06 Stewart Bryant [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded
2011-11-28
06 Russ Housley
[Ballot comment]
The Gen-ART Review by Joel Halpern on 22-Nov-2011 included a
  suggestion for improved clarity.  Please consider it.

  While calling a bit ...
2011-11-28
06 Russ Housley [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded
2011-11-28
06 Dan Romascanu [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded
2011-11-28
06 Stephen Farrell
[Ballot comment]
- Why does this header need an instance ID when the SRH did not?

- I don't get why this wasn't part of ...
2011-11-28
06 Stephen Farrell
[Ballot discuss]
Same discuss point as for the other RPL doc. Should have the same
solution as well.

What countermeasures exist for the attacks listed ...
2011-11-27
06 Wesley Eddy [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded
2011-11-27
06 Stephen Farrell
[Ballot comment]
- Why does this header need an instance ID when the SRH did not?

- I don't get why this wasn't part of ...
2011-11-27
06 Stephen Farrell
[Ballot discuss]
What countermeasures exist for the attacks listed in section 6? I guess
at least some hop-by-hop authentication and integrity would provide some
accountability ...
2011-11-27
06 Stephen Farrell [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded
2011-11-22
06 Jean Mahoney Request for Telechat review by GENART is assigned to Joel Halpern
2011-11-22
06 Jean Mahoney Request for Telechat review by GENART is assigned to Joel Halpern
2011-11-22
06 Jari Arkko [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Jari Arkko
2011-11-22
06 Jari Arkko Ballot has been issued
2011-11-22
06 Jari Arkko Created "Approve" ballot
2011-11-22
06 Jari Arkko Placed on agenda for telechat - 2011-12-01
2011-11-22
06 Jari Arkko State changed to IESG Evaluation from Waiting for AD Go-Ahead.
2011-11-14
05 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-6man-rpl-option-05.txt
2011-10-31
06 (System) State changed to Waiting for AD Go-Ahead from In Last Call.
2011-10-28
06 Samuel Weiler Request for Last Call review by SECDIR is assigned to Matt Lepinski
2011-10-28
06 Samuel Weiler Request for Last Call review by SECDIR is assigned to Matt Lepinski
2011-10-26
06 Amanda Baber
IANA has a question about one of the actions to be performed upon
approval of this document.

ACTION 1:

IANA will register the following in ...
2011-10-17
06 Amy Vezza Last call sent
2011-10-17
06 Amy Vezza
State changed to In Last Call from Last Call Requested.

The following Last Call Announcement was sent out:

From: The IESG <iesg-secretary@ietf.org>
To: IETF-Announce <ietf-announce@ietf.org> ...
2011-10-17
06 Jari Arkko Last Call was requested
2011-10-17
06 (System) Ballot writeup text was added
2011-10-17
06 (System) Last call text was added
2011-10-17
06 (System) Ballot approval text was added
2011-10-17
06 Jari Arkko State changed to Last Call Requested from AD Evaluation::AD Followup.
2011-10-17
06 Jari Arkko Last Call text changed
2011-10-11
06 (System) Sub state has been changed to AD Follow up from New Id Needed
2011-10-11
04 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-6man-rpl-option-04.txt
2011-06-17
06 Jari Arkko
State changed to AD Evaluation::Revised ID Needed from AD Evaluation.
I have reviewed this draft. Some of the issues from the other draft are visible ...
2011-06-09
06 Jari Arkko State changed to AD Evaluation from Publication Requested.
2011-03-30
06 Cindy Morgan
Document Writeup

draft-ietf-6man-rpl-option-03.txt

As required by RFC 4858 </rfc/rfc4858.txt>, this is the current template
for the Document Shepherd Write-Up.

Changes are expected over time. This ...
2011-03-30
06 Cindy Morgan Draft added in state Publication Requested
2011-03-30
06 Cindy Morgan [Note]: 'Brian Haberman (brian@innovationslab.net) is the document shepherd.' added
2011-03-29
03 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-6man-rpl-option-03.txt
2011-02-08
02 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-6man-rpl-option-02.txt
2010-10-22
01 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-6man-rpl-option-01.txt
2010-07-26
00 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-6man-rpl-option-00.txt