An IPv6 Routing Header for Source Routes with the Routing Protocol for Low-Power and Lossy Networks (RPL)
RFC 6554

Revision differences

Document history

Date Rev. By Action
2015-10-14
07 (System) Notify list changed from 6man-chairs@ietf.org, draft-ietf-6man-rpl-routing-header@ietf.org to (None)
2012-08-22
07 (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Sean Turner
2012-08-22
07 (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the Yes position for Jari Arkko
2012-08-22
07 (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Ralph Droms
2012-08-22
07 (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Stephen Farrell
2012-03-27
07 (System) RFC published
2012-01-12
07 Jean Mahoney Request for Telechat review by GENART Completed. Reviewer: Miguel Garcia.
2012-01-12
07 Jean Mahoney Request for Telechat review by GENART is assigned to Miguel Garcia
2012-01-10
07 (System) IANA Action state changed to RFC-Ed-Ack from Waiting on RFC Editor
2012-01-10
07 (System) IANA Action state changed to Waiting on RFC Editor from In Progress
2012-01-10
07 (System) IANA Action state changed to In Progress from Waiting on Authors
2011-12-21
07 Amy Vezza State changed to RFC Ed Queue from Approved-announcement sent.
2011-12-20
07 (System) IANA Action state changed to Waiting on Authors from In Progress
2011-12-20
07 (System) IANA Action state changed to In Progress
2011-12-20
07 Amy Vezza IESG state changed to Approved-announcement sent
2011-12-20
07 Amy Vezza IESG has approved the document
2011-12-20
07 Amy Vezza Closed "Approve" ballot
2011-12-20
07 Amy Vezza Approval announcement text regenerated
2011-12-20
07 Amy Vezza Ballot writeup text changed
2011-12-20
07 Jari Arkko State changed to Approved-announcement to be sent from IESG Evaluation::AD Followup.
2011-12-18
07 Ralph Droms
[Ballot comment]
Comment added on 11/30.

The working group summary is pretty terse.  I think it would be
helpful to explain that the ...
2011-12-18
07 Ralph Droms [Ballot Position Update] Position for Ralph Droms has been changed to No Objection from Discuss
2011-12-15
07 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-6man-rpl-routing-header-07.txt
2011-12-15
07 Cindy Morgan Removed from agenda for telechat
2011-12-15
07 Ralph Droms
[Ballot discuss]
Edited on 12/16/2011

1. I think there is an inadvertent omission of some text.  From
section 4.2:

  When ...
2011-12-14
07 Jari Arkko [Ballot Position Update] Position for Jari Arkko has been changed to Yes from Discuss
2011-12-14
07 Jari Arkko Placed on agenda for telechat - 2011-12-15
2011-12-14
07 Jari Arkko Ballot writeup text changed
2011-12-14
07 Stephen Farrell
[Ballot discuss]
Same discuss point as for the other RPL doc. Should have the same
solution as well.

What countermeasures exist for the attacks listed ...
2011-12-14
07 Stephen Farrell [Ballot Position Update] Position for Stephen Farrell has been changed to No Objection from Discuss
2011-12-14
07 Sean Turner [Ballot Position Update] Position for Sean Turner has been changed to No Objection from Discuss
2011-12-14
07 (System) Sub state has been changed to AD Follow up from New Id Needed
2011-12-14
06 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-6man-rpl-routing-header-06.txt
2011-12-01
07 Cindy Morgan Removed from agenda for telechat
2011-12-01
07 Cindy Morgan State changed to IESG Evaluation::Revised ID Needed from IESG Evaluation.
2011-12-01
07 Jari Arkko
[Ballot discuss]
Holding a discuss for IANA:

IESG:

IANA has questions about draft-ietf-6man-rpl-routing-header-04.txt:

The IANA Considerations section asks us to register the following:

1 ...
2011-12-01
07 Jari Arkko [Ballot Position Update] Position for Jari Arkko has been changed to Discuss from Yes
2011-12-01
07 Gonzalo Camarillo [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded
2011-11-30
07 Ralph Droms
[Ballot comment]
Comment added on 11/30.

The working group summary is pretty terse.  I think it would be
helpful to explain that the ...
2011-11-30
07 Ralph Droms [Ballot comment]
Comment added on 11/30.

The
2011-11-30
07 Wesley Eddy [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded
2011-11-30
07 Pete Resnick [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded
2011-11-30
07 Sean Turner
[Ballot discuss]
I'm stepping right out of my knowledge box so I might get back in it quite quickly:

I find it interesting that ...
2011-11-30
07 Peter Saint-Andre [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded
2011-11-30
07 Sean Turner
[Ballot discuss]
I'm stepping right out of my knowledge box so I might get back in it quite quickly:

I find it interesting that ...
2011-11-30
07 Sean Turner [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded
2011-11-30
07 Adrian Farrel
[Ballot comment]
I have no objection to the publication of this document, but I have a number of small editorial questions/comments that I hope ...
2011-11-30
07 Adrian Farrel [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded
2011-11-29
07 Ralph Droms
[Ballot discuss]
I have two Discuss issue that should be easy to resolve.

1. I think there is an inadvertent omission of some text.  ...
2011-11-29
07 Ralph Droms [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded
2011-11-29
07 Ron Bonica [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded
2011-11-29
07 Robert Sparks
[Ballot comment]
Please double-check the first paragraph of section 4 to make sure that "ICMPv6 errors generated by inserting the RPL option" is really what ...
2011-11-29
07 Robert Sparks [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded
2011-11-28
07 Russ Housley [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded
2011-11-28
07 Dan Romascanu [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded
2011-11-28
07 Stephen Farrell
[Ballot comment]
- how are RPL routers supposed to know which of them are border routers
at what point in time? Doesn't needing to know ...
2011-11-28
07 Stephen Farrell
[Ballot discuss]
Same discuss point as for the other RPL doc. Should have the same
solution as well.

What countermeasures exist for the attacks listed ...
2011-11-28
07 Stephen Farrell [Ballot Position Update] Position for Stephen Farrell has been changed to Discuss from No Objection
2011-11-27
07 Stephen Farrell
[Ballot comment]
- how are RPL routers supposed to know which of them are border routers
at what point in time? Doesn't needing to know ...
2011-11-27
07 Stephen Farrell [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded
2011-11-25
07 Stewart Bryant [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded
2011-11-24
07 Miguel GarcĂ­a Request for Telechat review by GENART Completed. Reviewer: Miguel Garcia.
2011-11-22
07 Jean Mahoney Request for Telechat review by GENART is assigned to Miguel Garcia
2011-11-22
07 Jari Arkko State changed to IESG Evaluation from Waiting for AD Go-Ahead.
2011-11-22
07 Jari Arkko [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Jari Arkko
2011-11-22
07 Jari Arkko Ballot has been issued
2011-11-22
07 Jari Arkko Created "Approve" ballot
2011-11-22
07 Jari Arkko Placed on agenda for telechat - 2011-12-01
2011-11-14
05 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-6man-rpl-routing-header-05.txt
2011-11-08
07 Samuel Weiler Request for Last Call review by SECDIR Completed. Reviewer: Chris Lonvick.
2011-10-31
07 (System) State changed to Waiting for AD Go-Ahead from In Last Call.
2011-10-28
07 Samuel Weiler Request for Last Call review by SECDIR is assigned to Chris Lonvick
2011-10-26
07 Amanda Baber
IANA has questions.

The IANA Considerations section asks us to register the following:

1) a Routing Type at http://www.iana.org/assignments/ipv6-parameters

2 ...
2011-10-17
07 Amy Vezza Last call sent
2011-10-17
07 Amy Vezza
State changed to In Last Call from Last Call Requested.

The following Last Call Announcement was sent out:

From: The IESG <iesg-secretary@ietf.org>
To ...
2011-10-17
07 Jari Arkko Last Call was requested
2011-10-17
07 Jari Arkko State changed to Last Call Requested from AD Evaluation::AD Followup.
2011-10-17
07 Jari Arkko Last Call text changed
2011-10-17
07 (System) Ballot writeup text was added
2011-10-17
07 (System) Last call text was added
2011-10-17
07 (System) Ballot approval text was added
2011-10-11
07 (System) Sub state has been changed to AD Follow up from New Id Needed
2011-10-11
04 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-6man-rpl-routing-header-04.txt
2011-06-10
07 Jari Arkko
State changed to AD Evaluation::Revised ID Needed from AD Evaluation.
I have reviewed this draft.

I have a number of comments, most of which ...
2011-06-09
07 Jari Arkko State changed to AD Evaluation from Publication Requested.
2011-03-30
07 Cindy Morgan
  (1.a) Who is the Document Shepherd for this document? Has the
        Document Shepherd personally reviewed this version of the ...
2011-03-30
07 Cindy Morgan Draft added in state Publication Requested
2011-03-30
07 Cindy Morgan [Note]: 'Brian Haberman (brian@innovationslab.net) is the document shepherd.' added
2011-03-29
03 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-6man-rpl-routing-header-03.txt
2011-03-13
02 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-6man-rpl-routing-header-02.txt
2010-10-23
01 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-6man-rpl-routing-header-01.txt
2010-07-26
00 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-6man-rpl-routing-header-00.txt