Skip to main content

A Reliable Transport Mechanism for PIM
RFC 6559

Yes

(Adrian Farrel)

No Objection

(Dan Romascanu)
(David Harrington)
(Gonzalo Camarillo)
(Jari Arkko)
(Pete Resnick)
(Ralph Droms)
(Robert Sparks)
(Ron Bonica)
(Russ Housley)
(Stewart Bryant)
(Wesley Eddy)

Note: This ballot was opened for revision 09 and is now closed.

(Adrian Farrel; former steering group member) Yes

Yes ()

                            

(Dan Romascanu; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ()

                            

(David Harrington; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ()

                            

(Gonzalo Camarillo; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ()

                            

(Jari Arkko; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ()

                            

(Pete Resnick; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ()

                            

(Ralph Droms; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ()

                            

(Robert Sparks; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ()

                            

(Ron Bonica; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ()

                            

(Russ Housley; former steering group member) (was Discuss) No Objection

No Objection ()

                            

(Sean Turner; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection (2011-11-02)
s3.1 and s3.2: Not being a PIM expert, I tripped up over how IPv6 addresses could fit in to TCP Connection ID and SCTP Connection ID.  I kind of had to guess where I'd find more information about this, so a pointer to the xoring mechanism in RFC 4061 would have helped a lot.

(Stephen Farrell; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection (2011-11-01)
- Presumably if this experiment is a success then some method of
doing automated key management would be required for a successor
standards track document. I think just noting that in the
security considerations section would be good.

- I wondered why TLS wasn't considered as an additional option.
Be good to explain why, esp if there's a reason it wouldn't work
well enough.

(Stewart Bryant; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ()

                            

(Wesley Eddy; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ()